Started By
Message
LSU fans griping about Bama getting in lol kind of ironic ?
Posted on 12/3/24 at 11:37 pm
Posted on 12/3/24 at 11:37 pm
Considering LSU was the one of the few or only one to get into a two team nc game with 2 losses lol, yet Bama can’t get in with 3 losses in 11 spots …. What am I missing ?
10
Posted on 12/3/24 at 11:39 pm to Soonerd78
Who did lsu lose to that year? Was it two of the worse teams in the sec?
Posted on 12/3/24 at 11:40 pm to Soonerd78
You do realize that people can make an easy case for South Carolina and it not pertain to being envious of Alabama, right? 
Carolina has never been to a BCS bowl or the playoffs. Perhaps some people just want to see the more deserving team and a fan base that deserves some fun to make the playoffs. That might be a lot to process for you.
Carolina has never been to a BCS bowl or the playoffs. Perhaps some people just want to see the more deserving team and a fan base that deserves some fun to make the playoffs. That might be a lot to process for you.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 11:43 pm to tigerbait2010
quote:
You do realize that people can make an easy case for South Carolina and it not pertain to being envious of Alabama, right?
How many Louisiana State fans are on here making a case for Alabama
The Louisiana State inferiority complex in regards to all things Bama is noted.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 11:44 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
Who did lsu lose to that year? Was it two of the worse teams in the sec?
I want to say it was Arkansas and Kentucky, so maybe.
But the asterisk was that both were in OT.
This post was edited on 12/3/24 at 11:45 pm
Posted on 12/3/24 at 11:45 pm to cajunbama
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/3/24 at 11:51 pm
Posted on 12/3/24 at 11:50 pm to Soonerd78
In their last 2 games, Bama got destroyed by a .500 team, and played horribly against a team with a losing record. SC won their last 6 in a row including multiple ranked wins. If those stats were reversed it wouldn't matter, the committee would put in Bama over SC because of money.
As for LSU in 2007, even with 2 losses that year, we were the 2nd best team. Until we were the first best team.
As for LSU in 2007, even with 2 losses that year, we were the 2nd best team. Until we were the first best team.
This post was edited on 12/3/24 at 11:53 pm
Posted on 12/4/24 at 12:05 am to Soonerd78
I’m not griping. Bama got the benefit of the doubt over a few others teams looking to get the same benefit of the doubt. It’s predictable, sure, but Ole Miss, Miami, etc all blew their wad.
To me, it’s similar to 07. If I recall, the big debate was Georgia (2 losses) and Kansas (1 loss). Neither won their own division, LSU won the SEC. I think it’s that simple.
It’s not THAT cut and dry between Bama and Ole Miss when you compare like opponents, and with no divisions, you can’t use a “title” to help someone and you have very unbalanced schedules.
To me, it’s similar to 07. If I recall, the big debate was Georgia (2 losses) and Kansas (1 loss). Neither won their own division, LSU won the SEC. I think it’s that simple.
It’s not THAT cut and dry between Bama and Ole Miss when you compare like opponents, and with no divisions, you can’t use a “title” to help someone and you have very unbalanced schedules.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 4:04 am to Soonerd78
We were SEC champions so there is that
Posted on 12/4/24 at 4:34 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
Who did lsu lose to that year? Was it two of the worse teams in the sec?
Two teams that finished unranked, one of which that finished with a losing record in the SEC (Kentucky).
Posted on 12/4/24 at 5:04 am to TexasTiger08
quote:
It’s not THAT cut and dry between Bama and Ole Miss when you compare like opponents, and with no divisions, you can’t use a “title” to help someone and you have very unbalanced schedules
Both beat Georgia but Alabama beat LSU on the road while Ole miss lost to LSU.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 5:07 am to PurpleandGeauld
quote:
If those stats were reversed it wouldn't matter, the committee would put in Bama over SC because of money.
100%
Posted on 12/4/24 at 5:21 am to timdonaghyswhistle
But the asterisk was that both were in OT.
Which is still a lot better than getting embarrassed by Vandy and Oklahoma.
Which is still a lot better than getting embarrassed by Vandy and Oklahoma.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 5:49 am to tigerbait2010
USC is #14.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 5:59 am to Soonerd78
quote:
Considering LSU was the one of the few or only one to get into a two team nc game with 2 losses lol, yet Bama can’t get in with 3 losses in 11 spots …. What am I missing ?
Mulligan arse bitches
And that wasn’t a 12 team playoff format
Posted on 12/4/24 at 6:13 am to Soonerd78
It's ironic in it's the LSU game that ultimately kept us out. Yes you could say beat either Bama or Ole Miss too, but if you have to point to one game it's that one, because of the absolute hose jobs on the part of the refs. And we didn't have Sellers for half the game.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 6:16 am to tigerbait2010
quote:
You do realize that people can make an easy case for South Carolina and it not pertain to being envious of Alabama, right?
I agree but not if you're an LSU fan.
We know better.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 6:19 am to Soonerd78
quote:
only one to get into a two team nc game with 2 losses lol
Wasn't that the year they also beat UK on the long tipped pass fluke TD?
Posted on 12/4/24 at 6:23 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
Who did lsu lose to that year? Was it two of the worse teams in the sec?
Cmon UT wasnt that bad
Posted on 12/4/24 at 6:25 am to southpawcock
quote:
It's ironic in it's the LSU game that ultimately kept us out. Yes you could say beat either Bama or Ole Miss too, but if you have to point to one game it's that one, because of the absolute hose jobs on the part of the refs. And we didn't have Sellers for half the game.
If committee had cited that, honestly id have been ok with them ranking South Carolina higher
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News