Started By
Message

Oklahoma's 2024 SEC Schedule is really tough
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:23 pm
Hard to see Oklahoma doing much better than 4-4 in the conference next year.
Probable losses: Alabama, At LSU
Really tough games: Texas (only not probable loss because rivalry game), At Ole Miss, At Mizzou, Tennessee, At Auburn
Only relatively easy game: South Carolina.
Even if Mizzou and Ole Miss take a step back next year, it is just as likely Tennessee and Auburn rebound. Maybe even South Carolina rebounds.
As Texas got a relatively easy transition schedule, who did OU piss off? Or conversely who did Texas pay off?
Probable losses: Alabama, At LSU
Really tough games: Texas (only not probable loss because rivalry game), At Ole Miss, At Mizzou, Tennessee, At Auburn
Only relatively easy game: South Carolina.
Even if Mizzou and Ole Miss take a step back next year, it is just as likely Tennessee and Auburn rebound. Maybe even South Carolina rebounds.
As Texas got a relatively easy transition schedule, who did OU piss off? Or conversely who did Texas pay off?
This post was edited on 12/9/23 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:26 pm to Miz-Stl
We're going to stink next year. Still making the trip out to Norman though.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:26 pm to Miz-Stl
OU definitely has it much harder than Texas, its suspect for sure.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:27 pm to OU_Fan
quote:dont worry they have at least one sure loss baked in
OU definitely has it much harder than Texas, its suspect for sure.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:29 pm to OU_Fan
The only thing that is “suspect” is OU’s team next year.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:34 pm to Miz-Stl
Good lord now Missouri fans think they are a tough team

Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:35 pm to Miz-Stl
It will toughen us up for sure. Better to start hard we’ll be able to learn and improve in year 2. Tx having easy schedule will give them false assumptions.
Similar to OU and USCw first season new coaches. OU was 6-7 and everyone claimed BV a failure even doing a comllete rebuild. While same folks claimed USCw was great and would be playoffs better in year 2. Well year 2 and OU went 10-2 and USCw went 7-5, complete flip. Same will happen in SEC, tx will think its easy peasy due to schedule then bam, 2025 schedule hits and they do worse.
What I like is all the assuming OU will finish 4-4, so if we do better its going to be a wow moment to those posters.
Similar to OU and USCw first season new coaches. OU was 6-7 and everyone claimed BV a failure even doing a comllete rebuild. While same folks claimed USCw was great and would be playoffs better in year 2. Well year 2 and OU went 10-2 and USCw went 7-5, complete flip. Same will happen in SEC, tx will think its easy peasy due to schedule then bam, 2025 schedule hits and they do worse.
What I like is all the assuming OU will finish 4-4, so if we do better its going to be a wow moment to those posters.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:42 pm to Miz-Stl
quote:
As Texas got a relatively easy transition schedule, who did OU piss off?
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:44 pm to Miz-Stl
quote:
Even if Mizzou and Ole Miss take a step back next year,
Speak for yourself. We have everyone of significance returning as well as adding some gold from the portal.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 9:47 pm to Miz-Stl
The only toss up games are BAMA, @ LSU, and @ Auburn
We own Missouri
We own Texas
South Carolina, Tennessee, and Ole Miss don’t have the horses to beat us.
6-2 minimum, probably 7-1
We own Missouri
We own Texas
South Carolina, Tennessee, and Ole Miss don’t have the horses to beat us.
6-2 minimum, probably 7-1
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:17 am to Dude20
quote:More than happy to revisit this post a year from now
The only toss up games are BAMA, @ LSU, and @ Auburn
We own Missouri
We own Texas
South Carolina, Tennessee, and Ole Miss don’t have the horses to beat us.
6-2 minimum, probably 7-1
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:39 am to Miz-Stl
Arkansas and A&M wanted home games with Texas, so the SEC obliged. Playing Oklahoma and Georgia back to back is going to be challenging.
Posted on 12/10/23 at 1:53 am to Miz-Stl
8-4 would be respectable first year
Posted on 12/10/23 at 2:23 am to Dude20
Tennessee absolutely has the horses to compete with ou. The sec has several teams Oklahoma has wanted no part of since the bcs era began. Honestly ou conference champ vs other P5 champs in title/playoff games is sad. You guys normally play neutral site texas(awful since mack left outside a year or two) and a g5 schedule. Blasted by Florida, blasted by usc, beaten by lsu blasted by clemson blasted by bama beaten by uga. You guys are in for an awakening
Posted on 12/10/23 at 2:26 am to bamabaseballsec
My bad lsu, should be labeled as blasted too, forgot about Joe burrow manhandling yall
Posted on 12/10/23 at 5:58 am to Miz-Stl
quote:Is that why Sanky was angry at ESPN leaking the schedule before he wanted it released?
As Texas got a relatively easy transition schedule, who did OU piss off? Or conversely who did Texas pay off?
I am just angry we don't play our traditional LSU, Alabama and Auburn because of those interlopers. NIL and transfer portal sucked enough now we get shifted out of our traditional games.
Posted on 12/10/23 at 6:58 am to scottydoesntknow
quote:
8-4 would be respectable first year
That record is reserved for only one SEC team.
Popular
Back to top
