Started By
Message
Posted on 12/3/23 at 6:35 pm to Diego Ricardo
Same. If FSU is not top four, then no way are they ahead of Georgia or Ohio State.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 8:52 pm to Lg
quote:
Strange how that’s still a W in the W\L column. The score actually matters!!
What a willfully ignorant response to my post.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 8:53 pm to deeprig9
]
This post was edited on 12/3/23 at 9:00 pm
Posted on 12/3/23 at 8:57 pm to deeprig9
I understand the feelings after a big loss. It will happen to any program. But yes, I would take Texas and Alabama vs Georgia. Georgia does not want anymore of Alabama. We’re the only team in the country that can match up with you. Injuries eventually caught up with the team. They were a factor. But the team in crimson did the butt kicking.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 8:59 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Would anyone on the committee actually bet money on Alabama beating Georgia in a rematch?
What’s Kirby’s record vs Saban?
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:13 pm to deeprig9
Maybe you should have won your game.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:18 pm to deeprig9
quote:
deeprig9
Agree completely. Georgia should be in over Washington. And, they might beat Bama in a re-match game.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:21 pm to deeprig9
I think this is not a good argument. However, Bama fans who don't like it have to admit their coach made it last year and was still making it in the summer of this year. It's true.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:25 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Would anyone on the committee actually bet money on Michigan beating Georgia?
Nope
quote:
Would anyone on the committee actually bet money on Washington beating Georgia?
Probably not
quote:
Would anyone on the committee actually bet money on Texas beating Georgia?
Possibly
quote:
Would anyone on the committee actually bet money on Alabama beating Georgia in a rematch?
Yep
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:30 pm to deeprig9
WAAAAAAAAAAH, It's like deja vu from last year, except there was a log jam behind Georgia this time. Hey at least FSU won all their games.
Posted on 12/31/23 at 8:37 am to deeprig9
Gold Bond for that chafing is your friend OP.
Posted on 12/31/23 at 8:51 am to deeprig9
Ranking teams that would be the hardest matchup against Texas..
1. Texas
2. Alabama
3. Georgia
4. Washington
or
4. Michigan
I don’t think Texas should be the top seed necessarily, but I don’t know how you could rank the top 3 any differently.
So yes, Georgia got screwed from that perspective.. but like I said before, they had a play in game and lost.
If they had beaten Alabama in the SECCG, then lost in the semifinals.. they are still one of the best teams, but they wouldn’t be allowed to play in the CG..
The NC from a playoff doesn’t mean that they are the best team.. they are just the team that won when it mattered most.
Georgia lost when it mattered most..
1. Texas
2. Alabama
3. Georgia
4. Washington
or
4. Michigan
I don’t think Texas should be the top seed necessarily, but I don’t know how you could rank the top 3 any differently.
So yes, Georgia got screwed from that perspective.. but like I said before, they had a play in game and lost.
If they had beaten Alabama in the SECCG, then lost in the semifinals.. they are still one of the best teams, but they wouldn’t be allowed to play in the CG..
The NC from a playoff doesn’t mean that they are the best team.. they are just the team that won when it mattered most.
Georgia lost when it mattered most..
Posted on 12/31/23 at 8:53 am to BigBro
quote:
hardest matchup
I could. Like this:
1) UGA
2) Bama
Past performance is not indicative of future results
Posted on 12/31/23 at 8:54 am to deeprig9
Can’t multiple teams get screwed? FSU and Georgia? It’s just the death throes of a goofy system that needed an expanded playoff with more teams.
Posted on 12/31/23 at 8:59 am to Demosthenian
UGA not in the tournament completely negates the “it’s the 4 best teams” argument.
If it truly ever was about the 4 best teams, UGA is 100% in.
Yet, they weren’t.
It never was about the 4 best teams.
Clown committee.
If it truly ever was about the 4 best teams, UGA is 100% in.
Yet, they weren’t.
It never was about the 4 best teams.
Clown committee.
Posted on 12/31/23 at 9:03 am to CBandits82
Yep.
I have no problem with it being about most deserving. Or the best. But pick one and stick with it.
The Committee (i.e. ESPN marketing department) completely gets this. The inconsistency is a feature, not a bug. It’s in their interest to be unpredictable and controversial. They never had any integrity, so it’s no skin off their backs.
I have no problem with it being about most deserving. Or the best. But pick one and stick with it.
The Committee (i.e. ESPN marketing department) completely gets this. The inconsistency is a feature, not a bug. It’s in their interest to be unpredictable and controversial. They never had any integrity, so it’s no skin off their backs.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News