Started By
Message
re: Be honest, how many of you were laughing when Proctor got that lateral/pass last night?
Posted on 9/28/25 at 4:28 pm to Amarillo Tide
Posted on 9/28/25 at 4:28 pm to Amarillo Tide
I prayed for whoever he might fall on
Posted on 9/28/25 at 4:39 pm to Woody4daTide9
Brailsford picked up a fumble and ran with it earlier in the year.
Posted on 9/28/25 at 4:41 pm to Crimson Wraith
Yep, that’s why I want to see a toss sweep
Posted on 9/28/25 at 4:46 pm to Woody4daTide9
Posted on 9/28/25 at 5:18 pm to rolltideroyalty
quote:
Did anyone else notice he wasn't wearing knee braces...
Brailsford isn't wearing them either.
Posted on 9/28/25 at 5:27 pm to Night Vision
All I could do was say holy shite...lol
Posted on 9/30/25 at 10:46 am to Marktastic86
quote:
Had to make this GIF
I saw that gif someone made and had Ludacris "move bitch" dubbed in.
Really wish he had fallen right, he might have scored. We should use him again in short yardage situations.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 11:29 am to Kerrygold
It was a good play but maybe re-word this next time. Seriously though, the blocking for screens was good all game and that allowed him to get a head of steam.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 12:55 pm to Chainsaw Massaquoi
I was trying to keep my emotions in check until that moment.
Amazing. I thought he was going down on about the 5 yard line to just sort of protect the ball and at that point he was tossing folks out of the way. Wish he had scored.
Surprised to see it Sunday morning as a rush and not a catch but the pass was indeed backwards.
11 yards per carry
Surprised to see it Sunday morning as a rush and not a catch but the pass was indeed backwards.
11 yards per carry
This post was edited on 9/30/25 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 9/30/25 at 12:58 pm to McGregor
quote:
Surprised to see it Sunday morning as a rush and not a catch but the pass was indeed backwards.
Had to be backwards. O-lineman are ineligible as receivers.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 1:01 pm to Chainsaw Massaquoi
quote:
maybe re-word this next time
Posted on 9/30/25 at 1:33 pm to McGregor
Now I wonder what Grubb may run off of this look. I could see Proctor going out wide again and we run something the other way.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 1:36 pm to ss4bama12
quote:
Now I wonder what Grubb may run off of this look.
Bring in a 3rd OT as an eligible receiver. Big man to big man TD pass. Give the people what they want.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 2:59 pm to Robot Santa
I want to see a fake screen to a quick handoff where LT Overton is the lead blocker looking to smack the first guy
Posted on 9/30/25 at 4:58 pm to Tide Groupee
quote:
Gotta think he could be used as a ball carrier in short yardage situations. He can actually move for a guy his size.
We had play in the first quarter stopped for a false start on the RB where Proctor was in motion. Could have been to lead block but the timing seemed a little odd like it could have been designed to get Proctor the ball.
Watching for that play next game.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:43 pm to Robot Santa
Players with uniform numbers from 50-79 cannot be eligible receivers. Tackle eligible used to be legal but ironically, Bama used it during a game vs Ole Miss to defeat the Rebs (1971?).
OM HC Johnny Vaught was so pissed off that the following Spring at the NCAA rules committee meeting, he crashed the meeting to demand tackle eligible be made illegal. The committee agreed, hence no tackle eligible anymore.
OM HC Johnny Vaught was so pissed off that the following Spring at the NCAA rules committee meeting, he crashed the meeting to demand tackle eligible be made illegal. The committee agreed, hence no tackle eligible anymore.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:32 pm to Amarillo Tide
Didn't we run a tackle-eligible play against LSU in overtime in the past 10 years or so? Maybe it was a tight end lined up as a tackle. I just remember a huge lineman-type guy catching a pass over the middle and taking it to the one-yard line.
Latest Alabama News
Popular
Back to top


0









