Started By
Message

re: Why does ESPN hate college baseball?

Posted on 5/29/26 at 10:14 pm to
Posted by tossedoff
LP
Member since May 2009
1713 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

If you have the ESPN + app, you can see any game for like $10 a month.


Again, trying to grow the game. Non-traditional fans. Not ones who seek it out by logging on and finding the game online.
Posted by borotiger
Murfreesboro Tennessee
Member since Jan 2004
15223 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

If you have the ESPN + app, you can see any game for like $10 a month.


At home. At work. At the airport. On the shitter. Any game on any ESPN SECN. ESPN+ or SECN+.
Posted by borotiger
Murfreesboro Tennessee
Member since Jan 2004
15223 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

logging on


I tell my television to put on whatever game. There is no "logging on."

On my phone, I open the ESPN app and press "watch."

Skip McDonald's once a month, spend that on ESPN, and you'll be happier. Or, like I do, have xfinity and have it included.
Posted by tossedoff
LP
Member since May 2009
1713 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 10:26 pm to
quote:

I tell my television to put on whatever game. There is no "logging on."

On my phone, I open the ESPN app and press "watch."

Skip McDonald's once a month, spend that on ESPN, and you'll be happier. Or, like I do, have xfinity and have it included.



You are searching for it. To grow the game, you need people who are not searching for it. You need people who stumble upon it. See how college softball has grown.
Posted by borotiger
Murfreesboro Tennessee
Member since Jan 2004
15223 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

You need people who stumble upon it


To make your argument make sense, every game should be on an over the air broadcast like ABC, CBS or NBC.

ESPN has 1 ESPN channel, 1 ESPN2 channel, 1 ESPN U channel, 1 SECN channel and ESPN+. All but ESPN had college baseball on.

This is a you problem.
Posted by Gatorbait2008
Member since Aug 2015
29305 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 10:38 pm to
ESPN+ is def worth it.
Posted by tossedoff
LP
Member since May 2009
1713 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

To make your argument make sense, every game should be on an over the air broadcast like ABC, CBS or NBC.

ESPN has 1 ESPN channel, 1 ESPN2 channel, 1 ESPN U channel, 1 SECN channel and ESPN+. All but ESPN had college baseball on.



These are not channels on cable? People don't channel surf on cable? I don't understand why you are adverse to trying to grow the game. Defend ESPN on making stupid choices on programming.
Posted by borotiger
Murfreesboro Tennessee
Member since Jan 2004
15223 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 10:46 pm to
Have a goodnight.
Posted by greenbean
USAF Retired - 31 years
Member since Feb 2019
6527 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 10:56 pm to
likely has something to do with the metro area of the colleges (potential viewers)?
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71483 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 11:31 pm to
Because it's a niche sport compared to football and basketball. It has never been one of the "big three" because there are only the "big two."
Posted by Gatorbait2008
Member since Aug 2015
29305 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 11:32 pm to
Prob. I bet the viewership is not that high..though def do not see many ads for it, highlights on shows, rarely hear them talk about....but they are a multi-billion dollar company. They know what they are doing better than my arse.
Posted by Kashmir
Member since Dec 2014
10358 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 11:39 pm to
quote:

Why do you show LSU/Alabama football on ABC primetime Saturday


Because of L3U’s “national brand?”
Or more likely, so the nation can watch Bama whoop dat Tigah arse once again..
Posted by captdalton
Member since Feb 2021
24752 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 11:49 pm to
quote:

Do people not tune in for the 16/1 game for the basketball tournament? Random people just surfing the channels might stop to watch a game that has a crowd and energy


The 16/1 games are usually noncompetitive and poorly watched. Other than fans of the #1 seed, most people don’t watch. Instead they find more competitive games to watch and games with two big name programs. Not a #1 seed versus a Northeast State Tech program. So to your answer, no, people do not watch relative to other games.. .
Posted by captdalton
Member since Feb 2021
24752 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 11:56 pm to
quote:

I don't understand why you are adverse to trying to grow the game. Defend ESPN on making stupid choices on programming.


It isn’t that people don’t want to grow the game. It is that people think you are completely wrong and what you are suggested would not have a positive impact. It is that people think you are wrong that more people tune in for “excitement” than for a game between two bigger name schools with larger fanbases. It is that most people don’t think ESPN made stupid choices on programming.

Have you ever heard of Bananaball? Since excitement and crowd energy are so important to you, Bananaball may be what you seek. It may very well may be more entertaining to you than first round regional college baseball games.
Posted by koreandawg
South Korea
Member since Sep 2015
14012 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 3:56 am to
The host teams are matched up against the weakest opponent in the regional. You can't predict UCLA and Auburn outcomes and most of those host openers were complete snoozers.
Posted by coldbeerfan
Orange Beach RTR Alabama
Member since Oct 2015
1702 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 7:51 am to
They give college baseball little attention due to the fact they have to constantly kiss the arse of everything NBA.
Posted by Gunga Din
Oklahoma
Member since Jul 2020
3661 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 8:05 am to
quote:

Again, trying to grow the game. Non-traditional fans. Not ones who seek it out by logging on and finding the game online.


Baseball is really hard to program... It is slow, but still has lots of dead time that has to be filled by commercials. You never know how long a game will last or if it will be rained out when you try to schedule it. So you have to have a lot of backup programing available. And if you have a four hour game... people get pissed because you are pre-empting scheduled programing.

Just not that appealing to non traditional fans. In fact even fans of some college teams just 'keep track of' rather than watch their team on a regular basis...

It is interesting because softball is actually growing and picking up more non traditional fans. Why? The game moves faster, the ball carries slower which allows for more defense... and most importantly a game will usually fit in a 2.5 hour window.

It is too late now... but IMO college baseball would have been a lot better off if they had used a seven inning model from the beginning as it pertains to fan interest and TV.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
39035 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 8:17 am to
quote:

Why does ESPN hate college baseball?
I give them credit for building college baseball into what it is starting back with the CWS starting in 82-83. That year, Texas (Shiraldo, Clemsons and company) vs Alabama (Davide Magadan and company) was my first year to watch it and I watched every game I could and still work. It has grown since. Mistakes were made along the way but college baseball is what it is due to ESPN.
Posted by Wishbone85
Member since Nov 2024
2706 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 8:26 am to
Is softball getting more popular than baseball? It seems all the softball games have been in prime time on ESPN and Espn2
Posted by borotiger
Murfreesboro Tennessee
Member since Jan 2004
15223 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Is softball getting more popular than baseball?


Softball has had better viewership than baseball for quite a while.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter