Started By
Message
re: Why do people keep referring to Bama as a dynasty?
Posted on 12/16/15 at 2:07 pm to Bootycall
Posted on 12/16/15 at 2:07 pm to Bootycall
quote:
but I do know a team that has not won a Natty since 2012 can hardly be considered a dynasty.
Soooo...the New York Yankees of 1960...winners of 14 of the last 25 World Series and 18 of the last 25 American League pennants...was not a dynasty?
0
Posted on 12/16/15 at 2:10 pm to cajunbama
Look at these records.
2008: 12-2
2009: 14-0
2010: 10-3
2011: 12-1
2012: 13-1
2013: 11-2
2014: 12-2
2015: currently 12-1
How could you not call that a dynasty with 3 national championships and 5 SECCG appearances (4 wins)
On top of all that, 2 Heisman winners and 2 assistants both off to coach major SEC programs, one having great success at the moment.
2008: 12-2
2009: 14-0
2010: 10-3
2011: 12-1
2012: 13-1
2013: 11-2
2014: 12-2
2015: currently 12-1
How could you not call that a dynasty with 3 national championships and 5 SECCG appearances (4 wins)
On top of all that, 2 Heisman winners and 2 assistants both off to coach major SEC programs, one having great success at the moment.
Posted on 12/16/15 at 2:12 pm to FourThreeForty
Someone needs to shoope this with Saban's face.
Posted on 12/16/15 at 2:12 pm to Bootycall
quote:
I didn't look up the definition, but I do know a team that has not won a Natty since 2012 can hardly be considered a dynasty.
Posted on 12/16/15 at 2:23 pm to Bootycall
quote:
They haven't won a Natty since 2011. That's hardly what one would consider a dynasty. Yes, THEY Have A Great PROGRAM But It's Not A dynasty.
Incorrect----We won it in 2012 also.
If Bama wins it that will be 4 in 7 years. Right now its 3 in 6 years. If that's not a dynasty then there isn't one.
Posted on 12/16/15 at 2:25 pm to Bootycall
Alabama has won half of the national championships in the last 6 years. Very very few programs have ever done better
Posted on 12/16/15 at 2:25 pm to Bootycall
Melt harder. We bout to win another, yes another, soon.
Posted on 12/16/15 at 2:56 pm to Blawdawg
quote:
But I wonder who has matched that winning % over nearly a decade.
Nebraska, Osbourne/Solich, 1993-2001 (9 years)
102-12-0 89.47%
Posted on 12/16/15 at 3:02 pm to ChoadieMcSmalls
quote:quote:
quote:
Someone needs to shoope this with Saban's face.
Put Les in blond chicks spot and Gus in Joan Collins spot and you would have a Farkin masterpiece!
Posted on 12/16/15 at 3:16 pm to BammerDelendaEst
quote:
Nebraska, Osbourne/Solich, 1993-2001 (9 years)
102-12-0 89.47%
I would imagine the Notre Dame teams in the 40's might have a similar percentage as well...they, along with the Nebraska teams you mention and the latest Bama run are the only teams to win 3 Championships in 4 years...Notre Dame actually won 4 titles in 7 years ('43, '46, '47, and '49)...Nebraska was only a missed FG away in '93 from winning 3 straight...
Posted on 12/16/15 at 3:16 pm to Cheese Grits
quote:
quote:
Someone needs to shoope this with Saban's face.quote:
Put Les in blond chicks spot and Gus in Joan Collins spot and you would have a Farkin masterpiece!
So you're saying that Les and Gus are Saban's bitches?
Posted on 12/16/15 at 3:25 pm to Bootycall
may not be a dynasty,but we will take it !!!
Posted on 12/16/15 at 3:27 pm to ReauxlTide222
1970's Notre Dame
1980's Miami Canes
1990's Nebraska
2000's Southern Cal? OSU?
2010-present Alabama without a doubt. No signs of slowing down either.
1980's Miami Canes
1990's Nebraska
2000's Southern Cal? OSU?
2010-present Alabama without a doubt. No signs of slowing down either.
Posted on 12/16/15 at 3:28 pm to jatebe
Joan Collins looks a lot like Cam Newton. Its the high cheek bones.
Posted on 12/16/15 at 3:29 pm to jatebe
quote:
So you're saying that Les and Gus are Saban's bitches?
Nothing gets past you does it?
Posted on 12/17/15 at 10:11 am to OldPete
Oklahoma also had the following runs
1949-1958 107-8-2 92.31%
1973-1980 83-8-2 88.42%
1949-1958 107-8-2 92.31%
1973-1980 83-8-2 88.42%
Posted on 12/17/15 at 10:25 am to BammerDelendaEst
this guy is an attention whore
Posted on 12/17/15 at 11:15 am to genro
quote:That's a clear sign your team is a dynasty.
Or when a program loses so few times, that it becomes very memorable. that everyone can name those 3 losses instantly of the top of their head to try to prove some point.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 11:21 am to VirgilCaine
A dynasty is considered winning 2 titles in 3 or 4 years. Very few CFB teams have done it. Nebraska, Oklahoma, Alabama ND maybe a couple more. Oklahoma winning 47 straight is probably the most impressive in history.
This post was edited on 12/17/15 at 11:24 am
Posted on 12/17/15 at 11:22 am to Bootycall
quote:
I didn't look up the definition, but I do know a team that has not won a Natty since 2012 can hardly be considered a dynasty.
You're coming off overly butthurt in this thread. Please stop.
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News