Started By
Message

Why did UT not hire Cutcliffe?

Posted on 9/7/18 at 10:08 am
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18032 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 10:08 am
You have accused Ole Miss of a stupid move in firing Cutcliffe years ago but in all of the coaching changes since, and you've had many, you never seriously considered hiring Cutcliffe. Why is that?
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
82952 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 10:09 am to
He like everyone else with a pulse turned them down.
Posted by CockInYourEar
Charlotte
Member since Sep 2012
22458 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 10:09 am to
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18032 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 10:10 am to
UT could lure him if they were serious. How many times did Saban turn down Alabama?
Posted by NDonahue
Member since Apr 2016
1053 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 10:10 am to
UT was going to hire Cutcliffe back after Kiffin bolted. He would have taken the job, but Mike Hamilton refused to let him bring his entire Duke staff with him. He wanted him to keep some of Kiffin's staff. My inlaws are UT people so I know some of the backstory there. UT's admin couldnt undermine the football program more if they tried the last 10-15 years.
This post was edited on 9/7/18 at 10:11 am
Posted by craigbiggio
Member since Dec 2009
31805 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 10:10 am to
Weren't they close to hiring him after Lane left but they couldn't agree on something?
Posted by NDonahue
Member since Apr 2016
1053 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 10:11 am to
Correct. See my post.
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18032 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 10:12 am to
So they wanted to hire the guy but did not want him to pick his own assistants? That's a recipe for disaster.
Posted by NDonahue
Member since Apr 2016
1053 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 10:14 am to
Yep. You couldnt make up some of the idiotic crap that admin has done.
Posted by Auburn80
Backwater, TN
Member since Nov 2017
7457 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 10:15 am to
I believe he has had health issues that make a lower key job like Duke better for him. Just speculating here.
Posted by GatorBait24
Pensacola
Member since Jul 2016
5380 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 10:16 am to
quote:

So they wanted to hire the guy but did not want him to pick his own assistants? That's a recipe for disaster.

It’s Tennessee are you suprised they would do that?
Posted by craigbiggio
Member since Dec 2009
31805 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 10:18 am to
The crazy thing is it looks like the only Kiffin assistants who were still there in 2010 were Chaney and Lance Thompson
Posted by CockInYourEar
Charlotte
Member since Sep 2012
22458 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 10:21 am to
quote:

It’s Tennessee are you suprised they would do that?


That choaching search was probably the worst one I've ever seen. They got hyped about 1 guy, released his name, then he would turn them down...and it happened again, and again, and again...then they actually hired Schiano, only to fire him the next day...eventually it was just like.

Posted by samson73103
Krypton
Member since Nov 2008
8098 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 10:29 am to
Cutcliffe wanted no part of the grease fire that is UT football.
Posted by VFL1800FPD
Nashville, TN
Member since Aug 2012
9055 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 10:31 am to
quote:

UT's admin couldnt undermine the football program more if they tried the last 10-15 years.



I second that!
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58028 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 10:37 am to
Phil wants Tennessee to suck so his legend grows.
Posted by PikeBishop
Bristol, TN
Member since Feb 2014
975 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 10:50 am to
quote:

UT was going to hire Cutcliffe back after Kiffin bolted. He would have taken the job, but Mike Hamilton refused to let him bring his entire Duke staff with him


No idea if this is true, or not, but it wouldn't surprise me. You hear this every year when schools try to hire a coach, but it doesn't happen.

But why? It seems crazy that you would hire a coach and then tell him who he has to put on his staff. If you don't trust his judgment in assembling a staff, why would you want to hire him to begin with?

It feels like these are political moves by administrators in athletic departments trying to demonstrate how much power they have. It makes it incredibly frustrating for the fans.
Posted by Rex Feral
Member since Jan 2014
11225 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 10:52 am to
quote:

They did. He said he would rather coach at Duke

That can't be good for Zero's ego.
Posted by mrbroker
Sylacauga Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
16493 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 11:00 am to
he is long in the tooth and has had some health issues in the past few years. My guess he was asked for his opinions but thy were going young blood.
Posted by crispyUGA
Upstate SC
Member since Feb 2011
15918 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 11:09 am to
1.) Cucliffe has a bad ticker and he’s in his late 60’s (maybe early 70’s at this point).
2.) Cutcliffe is adored at Duke, and has the support and backing of Coach K. That can’t be underestimated.
3.) Expectations are low.

Take those 3 things, add them together, and it’s a job he’d be foolish to leave.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter