Started By
Message

re: Why did Saban not have the same type success at LSU?

Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:01 pm to
Posted by ecb
Member since Jul 2010
9335 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:01 pm to
Less cheating boosters?
Posted by Hussss
Living the Dream
Member since Oct 2016
6741 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:06 pm to
You put Saban at any SEC school and he would be super successful but Bama has always been a Blue Blood and that's why the other schools you mentioned are just not comparable.

Yes, you can make an argument he would be almost as successful at any of the Big 6.
This post was edited on 9/29/17 at 5:08 pm
Posted by Sid E Walker
InsecureU ©
Member since Nov 2013
23882 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

I just don't see why we are using data that doesn't matter

If this thread was made in 1989, you would have been trying to convince me Florida had no chance to every be a power in the sec....

Which would tend to prove that Florida needs an extraordinary HC to succeed, much like LSU.

Bama has had great success with much lesser HCs.
Posted by The muffintime
Tampa Bay Metro
Member since Jan 2017
563 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

You put Saban at any SEC school and he would be super successful but Bama has always been a Blue Blood and that's why the other schools you mentioned are just not comparable.

The history isn't comparable....big fricking BUT though....

Any big 6 under Saban becomes what Bama is now. Even UT.
This post was edited on 9/29/17 at 5:08 pm
Posted by The muffintime
Tampa Bay Metro
Member since Jan 2017
563 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

Which would tend to prove that Florida needs an extraordinary HC to succeed, much like LSU.

doesn't prove that or even suggest it. Long-term, national power success comes only with very good to great coaches at a school they can recruit at. Good years (even multiple good years) can come anywhere. WILL MUSCHAMP WENT 12-1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If that doesn't close this question nothing ever will.

I won't even go in to the state of the SEC in the 20th century.
This post was edited on 9/29/17 at 5:10 pm
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46182 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:09 pm to
The answer you want: Alabama is such a better program than LSU


The actual answer: coaches learn and get better as they gain experience
Posted by Roaring Cowboy
MoWata
Member since Aug 2017
627 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

LSU fans should be upset. Gators get it probably better than anybody else.

If urban went to Georgia or Tenn you would understand.
Posted by The muffintime
Tampa Bay Metro
Member since Jan 2017
563 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

If urban went to Georgia or Tenn you would understand.

For the record guys this is the third time I've conceded this point. You owe me, LSU. I've been putting in serious work for you guys in this thread.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94906 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:24 pm to
quote:


Which would tend to prove that Florida needs an extraordinary HC to succeed, much like LSU.

Bama has had great success with much lesser HCs.
Since integration, lsu has 5 sec titles and 1 national title without an elite head coach in 45 eligible seasons, so averaging 1 Sec title every 9 years and 1 national title every 45 seasons

Bama has 3 conference titles and 1 national title in 25 eligible seasons


So averaging 1 sec title every 8 years and 1 national title every 25 years


Posted by Chimlim
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2005
17712 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

Would have been you had Saban not had that ego that pushed him to Miami.


Maybe. But over the past year I've come to realize LSU is not all in on football like Alabama is. If Saban didn't leave for the Dolphins, he would have left for another offer that LSU would have been unable, or unwilling, to match.
Posted by BhamDore
Nashville
Member since Aug 2009
6284 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:27 pm to
Because Alabama is the pride of Dixie Land and a National Brand while LSU is not. There is a pecking order for recruits in each state and Alabama is in the top 3 for the most important ones.

#1 in Alabama
#3 in Mississippi
#2/3 in Georgia
# 3 in Florida
#2 in Tennessee
#2/3 in Louisiana.

No other Southern school can go in as many Southern States and compete for the best players at any position.

All of that combined with being a national brand, the administration and financial support is why Bama is Bama.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94906 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

aybe. But over the past year I've come to realize LSU is not all in on football like Alabama is. If Saban didn't leave for the Dolphins, he would have left for another offer that LSU would have been unable, or unwilling, to match.
You are an idiot. We made Saban the highest paid coach in the NCAA

We also made Miles the highest paid coach in the NCAA

We also have had the highest paid coaching staff in the country 4/6 seasos
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94906 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

Because Alabama is the pride of Dixie Land and a National Brand while LSU is not. There is a pecking order for recruits in each state and Alabama is in the top 3 for the most important ones.

#1 in Alabama
#3 in Mississippi
#2/3 in Georgia
# 3 in Florida
#2 in Tennessee
#2/3 in Louisiana.

No other Southern school can go in as many Southern States and compete for the best players at any position.

All of that combined with being a national brand, the administration and financial support is why Bama is Bama.
This would all make sense, except for the fact we were pulling in #1 classes with Saban....
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66368 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:31 pm to
when he came to LSU he was Nick Saban up and coming coach.

When he took over Alabama he was Nick sticking Saban one of the best college coaches out there.

You have to remember how set LSU was the next three years. He probably would have won another championship at some point.

This post was edited on 9/29/17 at 5:33 pm
Posted by Sid E Walker
InsecureU ©
Member since Nov 2013
23882 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

Since integration, lsu has 5 sec titles and 1 national title without an elite head coach in 45 eligible seasons, so averaging 1 Sec title every 9 years and 1 national title every 45 seasons

Bama has 3 conference titles and 1 national title in 25 eligible seasons


So averaging 1 sec title every 8 years and 1 national title every 25 years

Hmmm...

It's interesting that you use 45 years to compile those stats for LSU and only 25 years to compile Bama's.

Use your 45 year timeline for Bama and let me know what the numbers are.

(As an aside...you might want to start at 1971 if you want post-integration stats.)
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94906 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:37 pm to
It's because lsu hasn't had an elite coach for 45 seasons since 1967

Bama has only not had an elite coach 25 seasons since 1967


Pretty simple

I broke it down to averages because it was unfair we had more eligible seasons...
This post was edited on 9/29/17 at 5:38 pm
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94906 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

(As an aside...you might want to start at 1971 if you want post-integration stats.)
dont think it will change anything. Bear didn't retire until the 80s anyway
Posted by Sid E Walker
InsecureU ©
Member since Nov 2013
23882 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

It's because lsu hasn't had an elite coach for 45 seasons since 1967

Bama has only not had an elite coach 25 seasons since 1967


Pretty simple

I broke it down to averages because it was unfair we had more eligible seasons...

Or...it's because Bama makes coaches elite.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
94906 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

Or...it's because Bama makes coaches elite.
so now you are completely changing your argument
Posted by Milk
central
Member since May 2010
1042 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:42 pm to
quote:


Record vs. Opponents that finished #3-#25 in the AP:
at LSU (2001-2004): 6-9 (40.0%)
at Bama (2008-2011): 10-2 (83.3%)


Why on Earth did you choose AP #3-25 and exclude 1 and 2?
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter