Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/17/24 at 4:43 pm to Monaleesa
quote:
Monaleesa
Member since Sep 2024
6 posts
Posted on 9/17/24 at 4:44 pm to Monaleesa
quote:
Monaleesa
Hi girl
Good to see you’re back
Posted on 9/17/24 at 5:51 pm to OldTimer
It’s not how big it is; it’s how you use it!
(At least that’s what my wife says)
(At least that’s what my wife says)
Posted on 9/17/24 at 7:10 pm to Aggie in TN
Cut Mizzou some slack, it’s been over since they actually won something ( co-conference championship) it’s kinda cute when they think they matter in sports
Posted on 9/17/24 at 7:52 pm to Audustxx
Some angry pOUrs in this thread.
Posted on 9/17/24 at 8:02 pm to phaz
There is zero chance this is remotely accurate
On3?
Really?
On3?
Really?
Posted on 9/17/24 at 8:08 pm to OldTimer
quote:I could. But I wouldn't give a dime to NIL. It will destroy what many of us have enjoyed for decades. It will come down to just those few schools year after year. Buy it - don't build it. It's really over.
Why are so many SEC fanbases poor?
Posted on 9/18/24 at 8:49 am to jonnyanony
quote:3
This is a ranking of single collectives. Most schools have more than 1.
Florida is ranked #4 on this list of total booster/NIL "riches":
LINK
shite list... Going back pre NIL. 2005 ha ha.... Get out of here!
According to total cumulative “donations and contributions” findings from 2005 through the end of the 2022"
Posted on 9/18/24 at 8:56 am to OldTimer
Spyre isn’t a collective. UTs collective is the Volunteer Club. Spyre is a broker. They facilitate deals for athletes with other interests.
Whomever did the list doesn’t know the difference between NIL brokers and Collectives.
Whomever did the list doesn’t know the difference between NIL brokers and Collectives.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 9:01 am to OldTimer
There spending on one collective does not necessarily represent the spending on NIL for a program. You think Dr. Pepper is part of the Texas One Fund?
And some of these on the list were late to the game and blowing their load for a year or two and cannot sustain it.
And some of these on the list were late to the game and blowing their load for a year or two and cannot sustain it.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 4:59 pm to everytrueson
You busted me, I still can’t get over the fact lowly mizzou actually won two games out of the last thirty
Posted on 9/18/24 at 5:03 pm to OldTimer
Dumbass posting something a dude made up. True answer is nobody knows what all the NIL payments are.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 5:05 pm to OldTimer
quote:
Why are so many SEC fanbases poor?
Not sure that's as reflective of overall alumni and booster wealth as much as it is current desperation of SOME of those teams to be relevant, again. It's early in the new era. There will be lots of ebbs and flows among top collectives.
It will be more accurate to take a 10 year avg of collective generated $$$ to get a fair assessment.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 5:07 pm to OldTimer
Good for Mizzou if this is accurate, but since these NIL's don't report or publish income, I wonder how accurate this is.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 5:13 pm to OldTimer
I count two national championships in this century amongst that entire list. Keep pissing that money away, Oregon.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 5:16 pm to OldTimer
All that shows is who has the best coach
Less money, more wins and Nattys super impressive Kirby
Less money, more wins and Nattys super impressive Kirby
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News