Started By
Message
re: Which has more potential? Oklahoma or A&M...
Posted on 11/5/25 at 7:38 am to RedDirt
Posted on 11/5/25 at 7:38 am to RedDirt
quote:
Texas has its first back to back win over OU since 2009. This can’t be a serious thought.
you're proving his point for him. Now that everyone pays, Dillon Gabriel is the only reason you aren't on a 4-game losing streak to Texas.
0
Posted on 11/5/25 at 7:42 am to YieldDawg
quote:
Hah wtf are you going to do for a living?
I took advantage of the army education money. I was a nurse for 6 years, and did well investing with travel nurse money from Covid. So now I day trade and have a coaching business. I don’t actually use any of the degrees.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:59 am to RedDirt
quote:
Texas has its first back to back win over OU since 2009. This can’t be a serious thought.
This isn't 2009. Things have changed.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 9:04 am to SneezyBeltranIsHere
Sounds like the OP is skeeered of Oklahoma
Posted on 11/5/25 at 9:10 am to SPAGHETTI PLATE
Aggies, obviously.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 9:11 am to SPAGHETTI PLATE
Whichever program has the better coach at the helm. Both have national championship ceilings. I'd argue that in the NIL era, Oklahoma has a lower floor than A&M. Not many programs can throw around as much cash as the Aggies.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 9:17 am to Tex117
A&M will never win a national championship. 1939 will live on. They are the laughing stock of the SEC.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 9:17 am to SPAGHETTI PLATE
A&M and not really close. Today’s college football is all about the money. The allure of playing fit a traditional power is largely gone. Don’t think high school or college age players are going to give OU a discount just to wear an OU jersey.
It’s all about money. The more you have, the bigger the advantage. Just how it is.
It’s all about money. The more you have, the bigger the advantage. Just how it is.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 9:29 am to SPAGHETTI PLATE
A&M is the team of the future and always will be.
Rodo
Rodo
Posted on 11/5/25 at 9:32 am to Red_and_black
quote:
Uh, a college grad communicating with other college grads ?? Sorry it went over your head.
Ok whose alter? Literally no college grad talks like this, aside from the blue-haired soy boys up north. Certainly not one who got their degree from a school in Lubbock, Texas
Posted on 11/5/25 at 9:33 am to Tridentds
quote:
A&M and not really close
It's a great thing that we will be able to settle this in Norman next fall.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 9:34 am to SPAGHETTI PLATE
Oklahoma.
More players in NFL
More Nattys
More Heisman
More QB in NFL
More tradition
As far as current Defense wins Championships OU has a great defense Aggie has a bad defense
More players in NFL
More Nattys
More Heisman
More QB in NFL
More tradition
As far as current Defense wins Championships OU has a great defense Aggie has a bad defense
Posted on 11/5/25 at 9:34 am to RedDirt
Because it looks that way. OU will probably fire their coach. And in the era of money rules all, Oklahoma is more at risk not keeping up
Posted on 11/5/25 at 9:38 am to SPAGHETTI PLATE
It's amazing to me how many still don't realize we are in a totally new era of college football. It should be called Minor League Football now. The blue bloods of yesteryear now can no longer cheat to win. Take a look at the parity we are now seeing.
A&M will continue to win, just as Texas Tech will....money money money
Oklahoma will follow the path of Nebraska..golden years are over.
A&M will continue to win, just as Texas Tech will....money money money
Oklahoma will follow the path of Nebraska..golden years are over.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 9:42 am to Mosnowman
It’s this. Across the board on everything.
Money is king. Above all else. Talk of “blue bloods” history, yada yada only matters to far as they are established brands with big doners that can monetize their “blue blood.” This leads to better coaches and NIL resources. (Ie, why some blue bloods will continue to be successful, Alabama, while others, Nebraska, maybe Oklahoma are at risk of falling behind).
Money is king. Above all else. Talk of “blue bloods” history, yada yada only matters to far as they are established brands with big doners that can monetize their “blue blood.” This leads to better coaches and NIL resources. (Ie, why some blue bloods will continue to be successful, Alabama, while others, Nebraska, maybe Oklahoma are at risk of falling behind).
Posted on 11/5/25 at 9:46 am to RedDirt
Posted on 11/5/25 at 9:51 am to polaroid1984
quote:
It's a great thing that we will be able to settle this in Norman next fall.
Brother.., you missed my point completely. Point was about money and NIL negating the traditional draw to play for historic brands.
You can think money doesn’t matter. Unfortunately it does. Very real advantages going forward.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 10:16 am to SneezyBeltranIsHere
quote:
This isn't 2009. Things have changed.
Have they? OU and Texas have the same record, and we didn’t need double OT to get there.
Oklahoma has a world champion basketball team that’s always been well supported. People act like there isn’t money in Oklahoma and economic powerhouses like Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas, Missouri or Louisiana will somehow magically keep up while OU spirals into mediocrity.
If your theory is true it’s literally the death knell of the entire SEC. The northern states are wealthier than every other SEC state other than Florida and Texas. And those two states split their cash between multiple schools. The advantage isn’t that intense.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 3:53 pm to Zgeo
quote:
Sounds like the OP is skeeered of Oklahoma
Posted on 11/5/25 at 4:00 pm to SPAGHETTI PLATE
aTm and it's not even close. 
Zero U is a season or two away from being with the likes of the other has beens like Nebraska, Miami, FSU, etc.
Zero U is a season or two away from being with the likes of the other has beens like Nebraska, Miami, FSU, etc.
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News