Started By
Message
re: Where I think we end up on the schedule…
Posted on 6/1/22 at 10:17 pm to Pulpwood Patterson
Posted on 6/1/22 at 10:17 pm to Pulpwood Patterson
If LSU can keep ties with Florida, I'd be thrilled. Some great games, some memorable games in years the teams weren't great. Both teams have won multiple national titles recently, series is separated by 1 game overall. That sounds like the type of series the SEC would try to keep.
1
Posted on 6/2/22 at 1:05 am to Pulpwood Patterson
quote:
Would TAMU rather play LSU than OU?
A million times over.
Posted on 6/2/22 at 1:09 am to Pulpwood Patterson
quote:
TAMU: TX, OU, MO
frick that bullshite.
quote:
Would TAMU rather play LSU than OU?
100%
Playing OU is like playing Bama. They are good team but nobody has any real feelings towards them one way or the other.
This post was edited on 6/2/22 at 1:12 am
Posted on 6/2/22 at 8:00 am to Sanitarium
quote:
You scared baw
Nah I’d be asking for Vandy if so. I just want to play good programs we have history with.
In order of importance that’s
Texas
Aggie
LSU
Ole Miss
After that I’d like OU if we’re starting up a new rivalry
Mizzou is on the same level of importance as a South Carolina would be. And if we didn’t have any of the above teams for rivalry week, there are a few other old SWC teams that would be more interesting
Posted on 6/2/22 at 8:11 am to Pulpwood Patterson
quote:Tennessee and Vandy are definitely musts for us. I think we'd be content with South Carolina or Missouri for our third.
You think KY plays MSU rather than SC? I feel pretty strong KY plays TN and Vandy…I could see KY and MSU
I like playing Mississippi State every year but they need to be playing Ole Miss Alabama and LSU.
Posted on 6/2/22 at 8:57 am to Pulpwood Patterson
quote:
UGA: FL, AU, SC
UF: UGA, LSU, SC
SC: UGA, UF, KY
KY: TN, VAN, SC
TN: AL, VAN, KY
VAN: Miss, TN, KY
MO: OU, AR, TAMU
AL: TN, AU, MSU
AU, AL, UGA, MSU
MSU: AL, AU, Miss
Miss: MSU, VAN, LSU
ARK: LSU, TX, MO
TAMU: TX, OU, MO
TX: OU, TAMU, AR
OU: TX, TAMU, MO
LSU: FL, AR, Miss
could 100% see that, could also see florida sticking with UT and then A&M in there for LSU or Bama switching lsu and msu.
i do think Ross Dellengers SI piece hit it pretty close but i could 100% see your scenerio playing out too.
Posted on 6/2/22 at 11:20 am to Pulpwood Patterson
quote:
OU: TX, TAMU, MO
For OU switch out 8$4feit for Arky, not building an OU-Ark rivalry moving forward would be criminally stupid.
Posted on 6/2/22 at 11:42 am to Pulpwood Patterson
It will not be like you think it will.
Bama
AU
Texas
OU
LSU
Florida
UGA
A&M
Vandy
Ole Miss
State
TENN
UK
USC
Mizzou
Arkansas
If you from the top group you will be required to play 2 of those 8 and 1 from the bottom 8.
If you from the bottom 8 you be required to play 2 of those 8 and 1 from the top
Bama
AU
Texas
OU
LSU
Florida
UGA
A&M
Vandy
Ole Miss
State
TENN
UK
USC
Mizzou
Arkansas
If you from the top group you will be required to play 2 of those 8 and 1 from the bottom 8.
If you from the bottom 8 you be required to play 2 of those 8 and 1 from the top
Posted on 6/2/22 at 11:56 am to Pulpwood Patterson
The OP’s list for LSU isn’t happening. LSU-Arkansas won’t be a permanent. LSU will get Ole Miss, A&M and either Alabama or Florida.
Per Ross Dellenger of SI (who tends to be accurate in his reporting of the SEC way more than he is wrong), the league has been divided into two halves. Arkansas is in the bottom half of the league. LSU is in the top half. LSU will get two from the top half and one from the bottom half. Arkansas will get one from the top half and two from the bottom.
Arkansas will get Texas, Missouri and another bottom-half team.
Per Ross Dellenger of SI (who tends to be accurate in his reporting of the SEC way more than he is wrong), the league has been divided into two halves. Arkansas is in the bottom half of the league. LSU is in the top half. LSU will get two from the top half and one from the bottom half. Arkansas will get one from the top half and two from the bottom.
Arkansas will get Texas, Missouri and another bottom-half team.
This post was edited on 6/2/22 at 11:57 am
Posted on 6/2/22 at 12:19 pm to Pulpwood Patterson
quote:
Giving Auburn UF, UGA, & UF seems cruel.
Would you want this Auburn fans?
Yes. Most of us want our Florida rivalry back.
Posted on 6/2/22 at 2:33 pm to UKWildcats
quote:
.
I like playing Mississippi State every year but they need to be playing Ole Miss Alabama and LSU.
I think MSU ends up with Ole Miss, Kentucky, and one of the top eight teams not named Alabama or LSU.
Why? Because Alabama has Tennessee and LSU has Ole Miss as higher ranked "must have" opponents from the bottom eight.
That means neither LSU nor Alabama keep MSU on their annual schedule. Auburn has Georgia and Alabama but no must have opponent from the bottom eight so they are my guess for MSU annually going forward.
Unless people do something different (like the pods that are rumored to be off the table) this is the downstream effect.
Posted on 6/2/22 at 2:40 pm to molsusports
AL/MSu first met in the 1800s and has been played more times than AL/Ten. Only a few meetings less than LSu/Ole miss. Not to mention the schools are barely 80 miles apart.
Just like UGA is pretty much stone cold locked into UF/AU/sc, I don't see any way bama's 3 woudln't be AU/TN/MSU.
Just like UGA is pretty much stone cold locked into UF/AU/sc, I don't see any way bama's 3 woudln't be AU/TN/MSU.
Posted on 6/2/22 at 2:43 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
AU/TN/MSU
Can't be true unless Tennessee is defined as top eight. Tennessee was apparently defined as a bottom eight team.
Which, given the last couple decades, makes obvious sense
Posted on 6/2/22 at 2:45 pm to molsusports
I havne't been online much in the last few days but I have no idea what you're talking abotu with teams being defined as top or bottom eight
Posted on 6/2/22 at 2:49 pm to Domeskeller
LSU can't get Ala. (Aub., Tenn., & MSU).
Maybe not Aub. either (Ala., UGA, Fl./Tenn.)
Won't get UGA (Aub., Fl., Tenn.)
Right now their best shot is Fl..
Maybe not Aub. either (Ala., UGA, Fl./Tenn.)
Won't get UGA (Aub., Fl., Tenn.)
Right now their best shot is Fl..
This post was edited on 6/2/22 at 2:50 pm
Posted on 6/2/22 at 2:52 pm to molsusports
Well, the SEC WON'T lose TSIO, so.....
Posted on 6/2/22 at 2:52 pm to Pulpwood Patterson
quote:
Giving Auburn UF, UGA, & UF seems cruel.
Would you want this Auburn fans?
10000000000% YES.... We will take this right now... One condition, we do not play them all at home in the same years.
Posted on 6/2/22 at 2:54 pm to southernboisb
quote:
Won't get UGA (Aub., Fl., Tenn.)
TN is not going to be our 3rd opponent
Posted on 6/2/22 at 2:58 pm to WG_Dawg
When do they officially vote on the format and when will they release it?
Posted on 6/2/22 at 3:03 pm to southernboisb
quote:
LSU can't get Ala. (Aub., Tenn., & MSU).
MSU is off the table for both Alabama and LSU if the top/bottom eight teams rumor is accurate. LSU has Ole Miss and Alabama has Tennessee
quote:
Maybe not Aub. either (Ala., UGA, Fl./Tenn.)
No feasible way on the table that LSU gets Auburn since Auburn has Alabama and Georgia - they would have a little eight team as their third permanent
quote:
Won't get UGA (Aub., Fl., Tenn.)
UGA (or Florida) would have to replace Alabama to get Tennessee on their schedule as a permanent opponent - because Tennessee would only get one permanent upper eight opponent.
quote:
Right now their best shot is Fl..
Florida, Alabama, A&M are the most likely to be two of the three big eight permanent opponents for LSU (Ole Miss is their only lock IMO as little eight permanent, which also rules out LSU playing Arkansas annually)
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News