Started By
Message
re: To our Big 10 posters
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:38 am to NWLA_Bama
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:38 am to NWLA_Bama
quote:
It was an open invitation for Big 10 folks, not just those from one fanbase who decide to post. I know there are others who just lurk. I was trying to get an opinion from them as well.
Can’t really blame them. There’s no Big Ten rants or Big XII/ACC rants. Probably would clean up a lot of trolling if there were. But then you’d still have all the Tennessee trolls
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:39 am to Buckeye06
USC is better than Texas, not sure on OU but its debatable.
Oregon has one large donor and no idea he will be there forever. Oklahoma state lost their big donor when he died and they are struggling, Oregon has 0 history and no idea they will last
Oregon has one large donor and no idea he will be there forever. Oklahoma state lost their big donor when he died and they are struggling, Oregon has 0 history and no idea they will last
This post was edited on 11/3/25 at 10:41 am
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:41 am to EV
quote:
[USC enters the chat]
USC is no longer USC. The sanctions really destroyed them. The west coast has been pillaged by other schools for years now. Do they have a chance to be elite again? Yes. Their 2026 class is elite like it used to be. On the field they have much work to do. It’s far from certain USC will be elite going forward.
Oregon might not be a blue blood but they belong in the conversation with Texas and OU talent more than USC. UCLA has been terrible. Washington could be a good program, but it’s possible they get another coach poached by the end of the month
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:43 am to TexasWranglers
quote:
if you think that what are you basing that on?
National titles which USC has more than double. when teams are close on the margins I'm gonna go with the top prize
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:44 am to Gimme Vaughn
The Rant craps on Ohio State's win over Texas, yet the Longhorns are 4-1 vs the SEC.
The Rant calls BS on anyone saying Ohio State has improved since Game 1, but then ignores Alabama getting curbstomped by Florida State.
How many times have the refs saved Georgia? Even Stevie Wonder could see that it was a catch.
At least Indiana and Oregon can stand on their own 2 feet.
If the SEC is so strong, then how come nearly half of the schools are firing their coaches?
The Rant calls BS on anyone saying Ohio State has improved since Game 1, but then ignores Alabama getting curbstomped by Florida State.
How many times have the refs saved Georgia? Even Stevie Wonder could see that it was a catch.
At least Indiana and Oregon can stand on their own 2 feet.
If the SEC is so strong, then how come nearly half of the schools are firing their coaches?
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:45 am to Raoul_Duke
That was probably the best summation of the difference in conferences, exactly what Texas fans have seen the first 1.5 years in the SEC.
I am not sure anyone will understand unless they get both sides.
Same reason why Texas and OU (mainly OU) dominated the BIG 12 especially when NU and others left to other conferences.
I am not sure anyone will understand unless they get both sides.
Same reason why Texas and OU (mainly OU) dominated the BIG 12 especially when NU and others left to other conferences.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:46 am to Buckeye06
You were 100% right I was wrong, forgot SC had so many Nattys.
I still think the best post was from the Aggie that made 4 points, it is different and a harder path int he SEC.
I still think the best post was from the Aggie that made 4 points, it is different and a harder path int he SEC.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:46 am to Buckeye06
quote:
I don't think that matters for 2025 really much at all. Just because a team wins a national title doesn't make the conference good. Tennessee winning a title in 1998 has nothing to do with them not being very good in 2025. LSU winning in 2019 has nothing to do with them getting run out of their own stadium less than 10 days ago. Auburn winning a title with Cam doesn't mean they are competitive this season.
It does and it doesn't. It shows you the SEC consistently has more than one to two "good teams" and the rest of the conference sucks. For 2025, I don't need to point to history to know the conference is deeper from top to bottom. I can watch NFL draft shows and the amount of NFL draft prospects that are now at places like Vanderbilt, South Carolina, etc that just five and six years ago didn't, tells me the conference is deeper.
I literally watched three former Bama players (this weekend) who pre NIL/Portal would have still been at Bama and providing excellent depth for Alabama. But are now starters and high contributors for other SEC teams. In years past that wouldn't have happened. Those teams would have been absent that talent and Alabama would have had it as depth.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:48 am to Simple Solution
quote:
Texas is not a blue blood. Neither is Oklahoma.
Over the last 75 years... Oklahoma and Texas are ranked in the top five in total wins... Have 7 and 4 national championships during that time... and have 9 Heisman trophies...
That is about as "blue blood" as it gets.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:56 am to BuckI
quote:
The Rant craps on Ohio State
This is the SEC Rant sir.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:58 am to Buckeye06
1. So moving forward towards the playoffs, if you aren't challenged, how can you get. If you meant you think they bucknuts are 10 points better now than anyone, then say so. Don't change your statement to match your narrative.
2. Oh boy you got me there. They beat us. You know a rival. I know you arent really familiar with what beating a rival means the last few years. They have also had to come from double digits down to beat MSU and OT with Kentucky. Again, don't change what you mean to match your narrative.
3. So if you are never challenged throughout the year, how do you get better at it? I know you were in a dogfight until halftime with that juggernaut that is Ped St, but you were able to pull away.
Im gonna laugh my arse off if michigan beats you guys again.
2. Oh boy you got me there. They beat us. You know a rival. I know you arent really familiar with what beating a rival means the last few years. They have also had to come from double digits down to beat MSU and OT with Kentucky. Again, don't change what you mean to match your narrative.
3. So if you are never challenged throughout the year, how do you get better at it? I know you were in a dogfight until halftime with that juggernaut that is Ped St, but you were able to pull away.
Im gonna laugh my arse off if michigan beats you guys again.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 11:04 am to rojak
quote:
Putting Oregon and Iowa in the same tier is ridiculous
Im putting money on Iowa this week to win straight up. Iowa has an elite OL, and Phil Parker is still their DC.
I’ve only watched Oregon in a few games this year, they look like the most athletic team in the country but they aren’t physical. Throw in home field advantage
Oregon looks like a team that makes playoffs and gets bounced in the first or second round
Posted on 11/3/25 at 11:06 am to Buckeye06
quote:
Again I can be proven completely wrong and SEC fans can say OSU was a fraud, but nothing in the metrics indicates that, and nothing from watching every snap says that either
Anyone claiming OSU is a fraud can just be ignored. The biggest difference between conferences is the future NFL talent even at the middle/lower tier schools.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 11:09 am to Nasty_Canasta
quote:
USC is a much more storied program than Texas
And Nebraska and Penn State are more storied than Georgia and LSU……but not in these players lifetimes. Not in the lifetimes of the players parents either. Only grandma and peepaw remember the stories
Posted on 11/3/25 at 11:09 am to Gimme Vaughn
quote:
Im gonna laugh my arse off if michigan beats you guys again.
Ok I've already laughed my arse off at you twice in just this thread so you'll be one behind even after that fantasy world occurrence
Posted on 11/3/25 at 11:14 am to Buckeye06
quote:
Im gonna laugh my arse off if michigan beats you guys again.
As a neutral observer, I can see it happening. Game is at Michigan and they have the best running game in the country. Plus Michigan needs that game to get into a playoff whereas OSU does not
Posted on 11/3/25 at 11:17 am to NWLA_Bama
I’ve only watched one Ohio State game (against Texas) and zero Indiana games.
That being said, both are legit NC contenders imo. Why you ask?
Two stats found on BCF Toys
FEI Ratings
1. Ohio State
2. Indiana
3. Oregon
4. Georgia
Why do I care about FEI Ratings? The NC has finished in the Top 3 FEI the past 10 years, and #1 in 4 of the last 5 years.
Points per Drive
1. Indiana
2. Ohio State
3. Oregon
4. Texas Tech
This stat has also been very important to the NC for the past 10 years, finishing above 2.0 Net PPD every year since 2017. Those 4 teams above are the only ones above 2.0 ppd right now.
Still lots of football to be played, but if I was betting, I’d pick one of those B1G teams to hold the trophy.
That being said, both are legit NC contenders imo. Why you ask?
Two stats found on BCF Toys
FEI Ratings
1. Ohio State
2. Indiana
3. Oregon
4. Georgia
Why do I care about FEI Ratings? The NC has finished in the Top 3 FEI the past 10 years, and #1 in 4 of the last 5 years.
Points per Drive
1. Indiana
2. Ohio State
3. Oregon
4. Texas Tech
This stat has also been very important to the NC for the past 10 years, finishing above 2.0 Net PPD every year since 2017. Those 4 teams above are the only ones above 2.0 ppd right now.
Still lots of football to be played, but if I was betting, I’d pick one of those B1G teams to hold the trophy.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 11:18 am to Buckeye06
Keep trying, you're doing great.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 11:19 am to Gunga Din
If my count is correct, there have been 33 games so far between the Power 4 leagues, including Notre Dame as a power conference team.
The breakdown of these games is as follows.
The SEC is 10-4
The Big 12 is 8-6
Notre Dame is 5-2
The Big Ten is 5-7
The ACC is 5-14
SEC
4-2 vs ACC
3-0 vs Big 12
2-1 vs Big Ten
1-1 vs Notre Dame
Big Ten
2-1 vs ACC
2-2 vs Big 12
1-2 vs SEC
0-2 vs Notre Dame
The following Big Ten teams do not have a Power 4 opponent on their schedule outside their conference.
Indiana
Washington
Northwestern
Maryland
Rutgers
Penn State
In the SEC the only team that will not play a team from a power 4 conference in the regular season is Ole Miss.
The Big Ten's performance this year in out of conference games is very weak, and there are a significant number of teams unconnected from direct comparisons to teams in other conferences. IMO, the one Ohio State win over Texas is doing a significant amount of heavy lifting in the annual "SEC is overrated!" screeching from the northern part of the country this year.
The breakdown of these games is as follows.
The SEC is 10-4
The Big 12 is 8-6
Notre Dame is 5-2
The Big Ten is 5-7
The ACC is 5-14
SEC
4-2 vs ACC
3-0 vs Big 12
2-1 vs Big Ten
1-1 vs Notre Dame
Big Ten
2-1 vs ACC
2-2 vs Big 12
1-2 vs SEC
0-2 vs Notre Dame
The following Big Ten teams do not have a Power 4 opponent on their schedule outside their conference.
Indiana
Washington
Northwestern
Maryland
Rutgers
Penn State
In the SEC the only team that will not play a team from a power 4 conference in the regular season is Ole Miss.
The Big Ten's performance this year in out of conference games is very weak, and there are a significant number of teams unconnected from direct comparisons to teams in other conferences. IMO, the one Ohio State win over Texas is doing a significant amount of heavy lifting in the annual "SEC is overrated!" screeching from the northern part of the country this year.
This post was edited on 11/3/25 at 11:21 am
Posted on 11/3/25 at 11:24 am to NWLA_Bama
I bet a lot of us ended up watching some Big 10 games this week.
Back to top


0





