1
Started By
Message
re: The SEC Should Seriously Consider Kicking LSU Out
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:06 pm to theballguy
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:06 pm to theballguy
quote:
Whether LSU violated them is one question
It's actually really not unless you're an idiot or a disingenuous prick
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:07 pm to theballguy
quote:
but continues to challenge the SEC in court. For the SEC, that's the difference.
If asking for a dismissal is considered "challenging" them.
quote:
Both schools had eligibility disputes, but they've taken different approaches to resolving them.
Bediako's case was over when his TRO was revoked, he had no other option.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:07 pm to moneyg
quote:
You are going to be disappointed.
Unlikely. Either LSU will get into place and be a member of the conference rather than trying to use the courts to prevent the SEC from enforcing the rules, or you will be kicked out.
The only other alternative to this is the SEC and the conference dissolves completely and/or leaves the NCAA without LSU.
What outcome do you think is likely?
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:07 pm to theballguy
quote:
LSU ultimately complied with the eligibility restrictions as well, but continues to challenge the SEC in court.
WTH are you talking about? LSU is not challenging the SEC in court over the eligibility restrictions.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:08 pm to whatiknowsofar
Then it should be easy enough to explain your position without the insults. Whether LSU violated a rule and whether the SEC has the authority to enforce its membership agreements are separate legal questions. You seem determined to treat them as the same thing.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:08 pm to somethingdifferent
Imagine your team sucking so hard you have nothing to talk about other than legal ifs, ands, and buts.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:09 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
WTH are you talking about? LSU is not challenging the SEC in court over the eligibility restrictions.
The eligibility dispute is what led to the broader disagreement over conference authority.
LSU sought to roster players whose eligibility the SEC contested, and the SEC subsequently brought suit over its authority to enforce conference rules and membership standards.
LSU ultimately complied with the roster restrictions but that didn't end the lawsuit. The two issues are connected by the same events even though the legal questions are different.
This post was edited on 10/14/26 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:09 pm to stitchop
quote:
imagine the Judge's reaction to SEC's response saying that Louisiana AG's motion to dismiss a lawsuit is evidence.
This kind of motion response can get lawyers sanctioned.
No judge would ever consider the argument that Filing a common and routine motion is a reason to rule against that motion.
in plain English, The SEC is telling the judge the the fact that LSU filed a motion is the reason to dismiss that motion.
this would be great in a court with forum members that hate LSU serving as judges
Number of times LSU fans have been right in the past 6 months:
0
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:09 pm to lewis and herschel
quote:
There are only blue bloods, the sec has the big 5
Georgia fans sure are cocky for a school that didn't win a National Title from 1980 until 2021.
Meanwhile LSU won National Titles in 2003,2007,2019.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:09 pm to theballguy
quote:
he difference is that Alabama stopped playing him once the court denied his injunction and accepted the outcome.
OR the difference is LSU did not roster or play in any games professional players and Alabama did. Alabama stopped after the court decision you say? Then why does the SEC threaten LSU for looking to court decisions? Why did the SEC allow court decisions to settle the issue of eligibility for Chambliss?
How do you idiots not see the utter hypocrisy and bullshite faux outrage you are vomiting?
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:10 pm to theballguy
quote:
but continues to challenge the SEC in court.
Why shouldn't LSU ask the court to dismiss the case?
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:11 pm to theballguy
quote:Apparently you haven't because you are continuing to say stupid stuff
I've read the arguments
quote:Judges disagree with you and this is all explained in depth in my thread. Sankey is currently in contempt of court. Do you know why?
those orders don't automatically establish that the SEC has no right to determine its own membership
quote:Is totally stupid, has no weight and Kavanaugh said the NCAAs business model is patently illegal. Again, this is all laid out in detail in the other thread that you refuse to read.
The SEC's amended complaint
quote:What I have stated to you is fact
You keep declaring
quote:Already done
And if you believe a court has already ruled that the SEC cannot expel LSU, cite that specific ruling
quote:Not only have i stated it ITT, it is explained at length in the other one.
Repeatedly telling me to read your thread isn't a substitute for making the argument
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:11 pm to theballguy
i'm sorry this happened to you
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:11 pm to ChewyDante
quote:
Alabama stopped after the court decision you say? Then why does the SEC threaten LSU for looking to court decisions? Why did the SEC allow court decisions to settle the issue of eligibility for Chambliss?
How do you idiots not see the utter hypocrisy and bullshite faux outrage you are vomiting?
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:12 pm to 3down10
quote:The rule is in contempt of court halfwit
prevent the SEC from enforcing the rules
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:13 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
The rule is in contempt of court halfwit
The court has never once said LSU has to accept or play any player who is given eligibility.
If you want the courts to be the standards, that's fine. You'll be removed from the SEC.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:14 pm to somethingdifferent
The eligibility dispute is what brought the SEC's authority into question in the first place.
LSU's actions prompted the SEC to seek a federal ruling on its ability to enforce conference rules and membership standards.
LSU eventually complied with the roster restrictions but that doesn't erase the underlying dispute. The SEC is asserting its right to govern its own membership and LSU is opposing that effort in court. That's the connection really and it's been the point all along.
HTH.
LSU's actions prompted the SEC to seek a federal ruling on its ability to enforce conference rules and membership standards.
LSU eventually complied with the roster restrictions but that doesn't erase the underlying dispute. The SEC is asserting its right to govern its own membership and LSU is opposing that effort in court. That's the connection really and it's been the point all along.
HTH.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:14 pm to theballguy
quote:
WTH are you talking about? LSU is not challenging the SEC in court over the eligibility restrictions.
You need to slow down and read what I wrote before answering. You stated LSU "continues to challenge the SEC in court."
LSU is not challenging the SEC over player eligibility. LSU never challenged the SEC in court. The SEC took LSU to court.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:15 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
They weren't "pro players" genius
That’s the funny part.
The premise was a lie. It was a narrative and because the media got behind it, tons of people believed it.
It doesn’t matter. The OP doesn’t care about the truth. And in truth, the SEC doesn’t need to be right. It can expel whenever it wants.
It won’t. The fans who assumed it would happen are now very disappointed to find out it really is powerless.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 2:15 pm to theballguy
quote:The SEC is trying to tie the 2 together and the courts aren't buying it. Again, the wider implications of all this is explained in the other thread; contract law, labor unions, tortious interference, antitrust, all of it
Whether LSU violated a rule and whether the SEC has the authority to enforce its membership agreements are separate legal questions
Page 9 of 27
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News