Started By
Message

re: The SEC Should Seriously Consider Kicking LSU Out

Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:39 pm to
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
42012 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:39 pm to
quote:


Also notice you’ve gone out of your way to avoid acknowledging the Missouri TRO announced today.

Why is that?

Always in bad faith this guy.


1. Because it's irrelevant to the discussion.

2. I've never once defended any TRO's. Not a single one.

3. I don't give a frick about basketball.



Posted by theballguy
HSV (Dealing only in satire)
Member since Oct 2011
44281 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

LSU is its own brand and will be just fine.


Agreed.

Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
76409 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Also notice you’ve gone out of your way to avoid acknowledging the Missouri TRO announced today.

Why is that?

Always in bad faith this guy.


3down10 is incapable of having an honest debate.

It's hilarious to watch him jump between "LSU should follow the rules", to "I know LSU didn't break any rules but they should be punished anyways because I don't like them."
Posted by DeathByTossDive226
Member since Sep 2026
923 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Name it then.

1. Harris and Wright win TROs.
2. TRO becomes injunction
3. SEC doesn’t even vote to punish LSU, much less expel
4. Federal lawsuit delayed, motion to dismiss in process
5. Harris and Wright + 40 Pyburn plaintiffs file contempt motion against the SEC and Sankey — pending failure of the federal suit.

That’s a whole lot of being right
This post was edited on 10/14/26 at 3:43 pm
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
9577 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

LSU has considerably less leverage than some of its fans seem to believe.


If LSU violated a rule in which expulsion is warranted, you would be correct.

If the SEC kicked LSU out and did not follow its own bylaws, then LSU would have tremendous leverage.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
128646 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

LSU would have to find an entirely new conference home.
Posted by DeathByTossDive226
Member since Sep 2026
923 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

I don't give a frick about basketball.

Oh well that’s a great fricking argument

What a genius.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
42012 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:42 pm to
quote:


1. Harris and Wright win TROs.
2. TRO becomes injunction
3. SEC doesn’t even vote to punish LSU, much less expel
4. Federal lawsuit delayed
5. Harris and Wright + 40 Pyburn plaintiffs file contempt motion against the SEC and Sankey — pending failure of the federal suit.

That’s a whole lot of being right


"We was right after we was wrong".

Posted by theballguy
HSV (Dealing only in satire)
Member since Oct 2011
44281 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

"We was right after we was wrong".



Point flew over so many heads today
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
42012 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:43 pm to
quote:


Oh well that’s a great fricking argument

What a genius.


It wasn't an argument it was an answer to your question.

Genius.
Posted by DeathByTossDive226
Member since Sep 2026
923 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

We was right after we was wrong?

This makes zero sense as a retort to this:

“LSU fans haven’t been right about anything”
quote:

1. Harris and Wright win TROs.
2. TRO becomes injunction, SEC loses appeal in 1st circuit
3. SEC doesn’t even vote to punish LSU, much less expel
4. Federal lawsuit delayed, motion to dismiss in process
5. Harris and Wright + 40 Pyburn plaintiffs file contempt motion against the SEC and Sankey — pending failure of the federal suit.

That’s a whole lot of being right

Not even a cogent thought following any sort of logic. You continue to embarrass yourself.
This post was edited on 10/14/26 at 3:46 pm
Posted by RGT
Member since Aug 2024
2897 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:46 pm to
LSU is probably the only school in the SEC that has a conservitive administration and the rest of the presidents hate it.We are not followers ,we see the way thingss are and if we don’t agree we speak up.Thats not how liberals do things in this country.YOU EITHER tow their line or they ostracize you.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
42012 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:47 pm to
quote:


Not even a cogent thought following any sort of logic. You continue to embarrass yourself.



You claimed shite like the lawsuit being delayed after LSU complied as you being right.

Posted by GrizzlyWintergreen
Member since Jun 2025
3427 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:47 pm to
Outed yourself as a retard.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
42231 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

When the conference objected, the dispute ended up in federal court.



The conference objected. LSU said it would abide by the conference rules. Then the conference proactively brought the dispute to federal court.

quote:

Read the lawsuit.


I have.
quote:

It's about whether a conference has the authority to enforce its own rules


Well good thing LSU has already stated unequivocally in public statements and written correspondence to the conference that the SEC has such authority and that LSU would abide by such authority.

quote:

I'd say the same thing if Alabama were doing this.


Alabama DID do this and faced no repercussions. When asked if he would do it again, your basketball coach said, and I quote, "100%" worth it . . . I would do the same thing 100 times out of 100 . . ."

quote:

If LSU continues challenging the authority

All legal matters between LSU and the SEC have been instigated by the SEC. No action challenging the authority of the SEC has been brought by LSU.
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
2793 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Cite the language in the ruling
Done

quote:

Telling me it's been explained in another thread
I'm not typing all that again. Go read it and educate yourself. Plenty of people found it judicially interesting
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
42231 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

If Alabama were challenging the SEC's authority in federal court, I'd make the same argument.


You're little schtick would hit harder if you didn't have to completely lie about the circumstances. I get this is a bit, but it's lame to put so much into something that falls apart in your first sentence or two.
Posted by JTM72
BR, LA.
Member since Mar 2014
1987 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

This isn't about whether NCAA eligibility rules are fair. It's about whether a conference has the authority to enforce its own rules. If it doesn't, what's the point of having a conference


This reads as if conferences have different rules within themselves? Maybe they do, idk. But what would the point of all the conferences playing in the same league if they don't abide by the same rules? That would be absolutely fricking stupid.

The fact still remains that former professional players have never been allowed to play in the NCAA(not in our lifetime atleast), and Alabama had a professional player play in 5 games. No ifs ands or buts about it. While you have this take that "thats not the actual issue"... When frankly, that is THE issue behind all of it, as well as the definition of a professional athlete.

You're entire post reeks of whiny bitch
Posted by theballguy
HSV (Dealing only in satire)
Member since Oct 2011
44281 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:50 pm to
You're confusing acknowledging the SEC's authority with conduct that demonstrates respect for it. LSU's written assurances are relevant but they don't automatically resolve the conference's concerns about institutional control. And the fact that the SEC filed the lawsuit doesn't mean LSU's conduct couldn't have prompted it. Those are two different things.

As for Alabama, Bediako played under a temporary court order and Alabama stopped playing him when that protection ended. If you believe Alabama violated the same conference obligations under comparable circumstances, make that case. I'd support holding Alabama to the same standard.

The larger question still is whether the SEC has sufficient grounds under its governing documents to take action against LSU. LSU saying it recognizes conference authority doesn't settle that question.
Posted by JoyBoyNika
Member since Jun 2026
200 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:51 pm to
Well shite this is easy,

we knew we’d beat Clemson, Tech, and Mcneese.

What do I win?
Jump to page
Page First 14 15 16 17 18 ... 27
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 16 of 27Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•Twitter