
Started By
Message
re: The SEC Should Seriously Consider Kicking LSU Out
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:23 pm to 3down10
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:23 pm to 3down10
quote:
Putting yourself above the rest of the conference is not a small offense.
Aggie rosters a pro player.
Alabama literally plays a pro player.
LSU just thinks about it and this hypocrite is in an uproar.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:25 pm to LVag1997
quote:
This is all saber-rattling and nothing will happen.
1 hundo agree that nothing will happen. But if the SEC wanted to, they certainly could ruin LSU sports.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:25 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Aggie rosters a pro player.
Alabama literally plays a pro player.
LSU just thinks about it and this hypocrite is in an uproar.

Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:26 pm to moneyg
quote:
This is true.
How about you go on record. What do you think the direct result will be of this case?
Are you bold enough to answer?
3 possible outcomes I see.
1. LSU gets in line, takes the penalties, it gets established that the SEC has the right to enforce it's standards and everyone moves on.
2. LSU gets kicked out of the conference.
3. The SEC disbands and reforms outside the NCAA as a separate entity without LSU removing the chains given to the NCAA. That start they will likely play each other or maybe some games with other college teams if allowed as normal, while other conferences follow suit. The playoff committee being a separate entity is able to include both the NCAA and the SEC at the end of the year.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:26 pm to Wolfhound45
Oh you guys know it was different all right.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:26 pm to theballguy
quote:
they certainly could ruin LSU sports.
and most likely the SEC as well.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:27 pm to 3down10
quote:
LSU gets in line, takes the penalties, it gets established that the SEC has the right to enforce it's standards and everyone moves on.
So LSU gets penalties for breaking no rules, which establishes the SEC's right to enforce its rules?
W
U
T
?
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:29 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
and most likely the SEC as well.
LSU has considerably less leverage than some of its fans seem to believe. The SEC would lose a valuable member, but it would still have Alabama, Georgia, Texas, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Florida, and the rest of the conference.
LSU, on the other hand, would lose its SEC revenue, established rivalries, and the benefits of belonging to the most powerful conference in college football.
The SEC would have fifteen members to absorb the loss. LSU would have to find an entirely new conference home. Those are not even close in equal positions of strength.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:29 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Aggie rosters a pro player.
Alabama literally plays a pro player.
LSU just thinks about it and this hypocrite is in an uproar.
Punish them.
Maybe the difference is those were filed as individual exceptions rather than attacking the ability to enforce a rule completely.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:30 pm to theballguy
Kicking us out would be comical but honestly wouldn't mind it. LSU is its own brand and will be just fine.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:30 pm to theballguy
quote:
The SEC would lose a valuable member, but it would still have Alabama, Georgia, Texas, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Florida, and the rest of the conference.
Until the rest of the conference felt like one of them was pushing a rule a bit too much.
Maybe they'd kick Texas out for spending too much NIL, maybe Bama will establish a new dynasty and get kicked out because everyone hates them. That'll be an easy road to go down, once the first domino falls.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:31 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
So LSU gets penalties for breaking no rules, which establishes the SEC's right to enforce its rules?
The fact LSU is playing this kind of game is exactly why they should be kicked out.
An inability to man up and take responsibility while trying to gaslight the entire world instead.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:31 pm to 3down10
quote:
Punish them.
Maybe the difference is those were filed as individual exceptions rather than attacking the ability to enforce a rule completely.
They were all filed the exact same way.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:32 pm to 3down10
quote:
The fact LSU is playing this kind of game is exactly why they should be kicked out.
An inability to man up and take responsibility while trying to gaslight the entire world instead.
You can't seem to figure out if you want the actual rules enforced or not. Maybe, but just sometimes.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:32 pm to 3down10
quote:
3 possible outcomes I see.
1. LSU gets in line, takes the penalties, it gets established that the SEC has the right to enforce it's standards and everyone moves on.
I can't wait for the SEC is state the rule or rules that were broken. Of course, the SEC could just vote them out and let the chips fall where they may.
I think the lawsuit gets dismissed as LSU has stated in its rebuttal that the SEC has the authority to enforce its rules. Not sure how a court would keep it going forward if the primary reason for the lawsuit is not disputed by the defendant.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:32 pm to JoyBoyNika
quote:
Ah, so you’re an idiot.
Number of times LSU fans have been right about anything in the past 6 months:
ZERO.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:36 pm to 3down10
Well that’s just blatantly false.
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:37 pm to JoyBoyNika
quote:
Well that’s just blatantly false.
Name it then.
In addition to the lawsuits, you already have 2 losses on the season. But a month ago you were the best team ever etc.
This post was edited on 10/14/26 at 3:38 pm
Posted on 10/14/26 at 3:37 pm to 3down10
quote:
the difference is those were filed as individual exceptions rather than attacking the ability to enforce a rule completely.
You talking about TROs?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Also notice you’ve gone out of your way to avoid acknowledging the Missouri TRO announced today.
Why is that?
Always in bad faith this guy.

Popular
Back to top


2








