Started By
Message
Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:35 pm to BoarEd
quote:
It's what they have said
If you are talking about the couple of statements in the lawsuit, that is laughable as well. They know it and it’s probably one reason that delayed the court hearing.
They got emotional and ran to the courts and now they are trying to find an exit strategy and save face.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:36 pm to BoarEd
Ladies and gentlemen, we have found the dumbest poster on the entire SECRant.
Congrats Hog! You did it.
Congrats Hog! You did it.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:36 pm to BoarEd
Convinced you’re a troll at this point
Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:37 pm to BoarEd
Go back to the Poli board bro.
Kiffin gave the SEC the bird and Spankey's balls are on top of the refrigerator.
Pussy can't do shite about it.

Kiffin gave the SEC the bird and Spankey's balls are on top of the refrigerator.
Pussy can't do shite about it.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:38 pm to deathvalleytiger10
I expect they will amend their suit again and narrow the scope of it. Probably change their damages sought after. LSU caved to their demands after all. But the crux of the issue there is still the question of whether the SEC has the autonomy to guide their own conference or be held to the whims of the courts on a case by case basis. This will still run its course through the courts. Separately Sankey is going to try to punish LSU.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:39 pm to BoarEd
LSU: “We didn’t get punished for enlisting NFL players to sue our SEC brethren.”
As if that’s a win?
Do you EVEN hear yourselves?
As if that’s a win?
Do you EVEN hear yourselves?
Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:46 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Comments such as the "cold gumbo"
What does that have to do with LSU?
Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:47 pm to QBUMizzou
LMAO, that was a pathetic effort.
First of all, LSU didn't "enlist" players to sue anyone.
Secondly, most of the national media has been able to see the truth about Sankey.
Thirdly, the LSU brand is the hottest in college football.
Take off those stained Mizzou glasses and make an attempt to see the light.
First of all, LSU didn't "enlist" players to sue anyone.
Secondly, most of the national media has been able to see the truth about Sankey.
Thirdly, the LSU brand is the hottest in college football.
Take off those stained Mizzou glasses and make an attempt to see the light.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:51 pm to BoarEd
LSU caved? I know that’s a talking point, but not exactly accurate. LSU and Kiffin never said “we are rostering these players.” Consistently they said they would review court decisions AND SEC rules. They chose wisely.
Now, I’m in agreement that the SEC is trying to get control of the state court cases. The problem they face is selective prosecution that they have done. Chambliss is playing via a state TRO that the SEC chose to let it be. If they want to exercise authority, you have to do it consistently or they will have problems.
Lastly, Sankey wants to sanction LSU, yes he does. His problem is the that SEC bylaws are very specific on when a coach can be suspended and that involves violating a NCAA or SEC rule. No one has pointed to a specific violation. No one.
People don’t like that Kiffin advocated for these players but that’s not a violation. Ole Miss advocated for Chambliss. Vandy advocated for Pavia. Both went to court. It’s not a violation.
IMO. Cooler heads are prevailing and the SEC realizes that suspending Kiffin is going to be tough to justify.
Now, I’m in agreement that the SEC is trying to get control of the state court cases. The problem they face is selective prosecution that they have done. Chambliss is playing via a state TRO that the SEC chose to let it be. If they want to exercise authority, you have to do it consistently or they will have problems.
Lastly, Sankey wants to sanction LSU, yes he does. His problem is the that SEC bylaws are very specific on when a coach can be suspended and that involves violating a NCAA or SEC rule. No one has pointed to a specific violation. No one.
People don’t like that Kiffin advocated for these players but that’s not a violation. Ole Miss advocated for Chambliss. Vandy advocated for Pavia. Both went to court. It’s not a violation.
IMO. Cooler heads are prevailing and the SEC realizes that suspending Kiffin is going to be tough to justify.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:54 pm to BoarEd
quote:
I expect they will amend their suit again
Lmao at the SEC amending their suit like 6 times without a filed response from any of the defendants. Man that’s embarrassing
Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:56 pm to krewerider
quote:
BoarEd is a man without a football team. I mean, is Arkansas even playing this year?
Yeah there might be a correlation there. Good point.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:56 pm to deathvalleytiger10
I appreciate you actually trying to discuss the issue rather than sling shite around like your cohorts. 
Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:57 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Lmao at the SEC amending their suit like 6 times without a filed response from any of the defendants. Man that’s embarrassing
It may be embarrassing, but it's still an issue. It doesn't just go away because they amended their suit and asked for a continuance
Posted on 9/10/26 at 6:59 pm to BoarEd
quote:
I appreciate you actually trying to discuss the issue rather than sling shite around like your cohorts
Who you calling a "hort" ????
Posted on 9/10/26 at 7:00 pm to BoarEd
BoarEd..You keep moving the goalposts day after day after day....started with your positivity on a 100% death penalty for LSU AND KIFFIN and now I see you are down to "potential future sanctions" and "enough rope to hang themselves" cause everything else completely blew up in your face....
It's kind of pitiful, kind of hilarious.
It's kind of pitiful, kind of hilarious.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 7:18 pm to BoarEd
quote:
. Comments such as the "cold gumbo" comment are not going to weigh in LSU's favo
How would a comment made by a lawyer representing the players ever be attributed to LSU?
Posted on 9/10/26 at 7:26 pm to BoarEd
This is your worst conspiracy theory yet.
Popular
Back to top


0






