Started By
Message

re: The SEC has multiple athletes from the ATP Tour who have made 6 figures

Posted on 9/4/26 at 6:31 am to
Posted by captdalton
Member since Feb 2021
26207 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 6:31 am to
quote:

You can’t require even voluntary members to break the law or follow rules that are legally punitive


They are not telling LSU to do so.

But if Kiffin’s roster includes any of these prohibited players there is a good chance the other universities just tell LSU to leave. If that happens LSU will be free to roster and play whomever, just not as a member of the SEC.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 6:32 am
Posted by boweswi05
birmingham
Member since Aug 2016
6904 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 6:34 am to
quote:

Yeah I’m not mad at the local court.



Stop lying.
Posted by lsu711
Member since Sep 2003
15749 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 6:34 am to
quote:

Had to happen eventually I guess.

Must be.

My only point is the SEC has a few big earners that carry the Vanderbilts, Miss States and Ole Misses. Without LSU, Alabama will have to carry more of that burden. They will need to be prepared to do that.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112886 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 6:35 am to
quote:

They are not telling LSU to do so.
They quite literally are

LSU has yet to break any sec rule and lsu has yet to go to court at all. However, by court injunction, we are not allowed to drop these players

The SEC is 100% threatening to penalize us if we don’t follow court orders my friend
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 6:36 am
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112886 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 6:36 am to
quote:

don’t see Sankey being one to forget no matter where the dust settles on all this mess.
Sankey surviving this is almost zero. He has made an absolute mess of this regardless of which side you are on
Posted by Whentheleveebreaks
Member since Aug 2020
2949 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 6:40 am to
I keep seeing LSU posters stating this. Just more denial bc they should know they are freaked going forward.

You realize LSU made this mess, not Sankey.

Or it appears you do not.

Your hope that Sankey is gone from all of this just proves my point. In your subconscious you know LSU has made a mistake. But instead of stating that it was unwise to make an enemy of Sankey, you deflect and lie to yourself that he will not be here in the future.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 7:05 am
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
24848 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 6:42 am to
quote:

Stop lying.

I don’t blame the guy for ruling as he did, it would’ve been career suicide to do otherwise.

I don’t even blame LSU for wanting the players originally.

But the rule has been passed and I’m trying to patiently explain that the question has now escalated given the passage of the rule banning them.

Either the question of who gets to participate in SEC athletics resides with local judges in Lexington and Baton Rouge or it sits with the league office.

It’s not really about these players anymore, it’s about whether the conference is impotent to enforce rules.

The NCAA showed it couldn’t and is dying.

The SEC thinks it has to in order to survive long term. You’ve made this the litmus test.
Posted by boweswi05
birmingham
Member since Aug 2016
6904 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 6:45 am to
quote:

It’s not really about these players anymore, it’s about whether the conference is impotent to enforce rules.


Just trying to enforce rules for one program isn't going to go the way you think it will.

Enforce the rules equally for everyone.
Why didn't Bama get sued for playing a literal pro in basketball,?
Because Greg Sankey is a fricking Bama homer.The fricking SEC offices are in Birmingham.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 6:51 am
Posted by 1609tiger
Member since Feb 2011
3835 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 6:46 am to
Once again the court has basically said LSU must accept these players. Do they just ignore that?
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
24848 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 6:47 am to
quote:

My only point is the SEC has a few big earners that carry the Vanderbilts, Miss States and Ole Misses. Without LSU, Alabama will have to carry more of that burden. They will need to be prepared to do that.

Of course.

Ultimately even Bama and LSU are replaceable though if the powers that be believe that the cost to keep a cornerstone is the viability of the conference long term.

Do you want all of a reduced revenue stream while bringing in UNC as a replacement or none of what you currently have when the schools realize you are as worthless as the NCAA and decide to replace you with something that would actually have enforcement capacity to ensure the business model is sustainable into the future?

The SEC isn’t a going concern if it can’t make the rules.
Posted by lsu711
Member since Sep 2003
15749 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 6:55 am to
quote:

The SEC isn’t a going concern if it can’t make the rules.

Agree.

But the rules can’t break the law. In Wisne, the court decided the NCAA was violating antitrust law. The SEC is now saying if the NCAA can’t, then we can. 16 schools breaking the law doesn’t it make it ok.
Posted by Whentheleveebreaks
Member since Aug 2020
2949 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 6:59 am to
Yes LSU can do what they want.

Just like Sankey can state the rules of the SEC. LSU can determine who stays and plays on their roster.

It’s sad I even have to state this.
Posted by ColoradoAg
Colorado
Member since Sep 2011
28921 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:01 am to
quote:

By naming LSU and its BOS, they have, by proxy, sued the state of Louisiana. Good luck with tha
Remove the idiots from Louisiana. Problem solved
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
24848 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:03 am to
quote:

Just trying to enforce rules for one program isn't going to go the way you think it will. Enforce the rules equally for everyone.

The rule in question was passed within the last week. Who don’t they apply to.
quote:

Enforce the rules equally for everyone. Why didn't Bama get sued for playing a literal pro in basketball,?

Sankey supported the NcAA suit against Bama and made it clear they needed to back down so they did.

LSU will have to decide if they want to back down or not.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52974 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:03 am to
quote:

But if Kiffin’s roster includes any of these prohibited players there is a good chance the other universities just tell LSU to leave. If that happens LSU will be free to roster and play whomever, just not as a member of the SEC.


During the hearing yesterday 3 SEC programs signed players that went pro.

3 of them.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
24848 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:05 am to
LSU can roster but not play these players until the legal issues are resolved.

I’d make a deal with the conference that the players will be on scholarship per the law but not be played in accordance with the rule and the current court decision while getting them to agree not to lay the hand of God on Kiffin for orchestrating this mess.
Posted by RockyRococco
Jacksonville FL
Member since Aug 2021
1979 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:07 am to
you're not getting it. it's lane kiffin and LSU therefore bad. don't overthink it.
Posted by lsu711
Member since Sep 2003
15749 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:11 am to
quote:

Kiffin for orchestrating this mess.

That was proven false by the person who made the joke initially. There were 30+ players on the Louisiana suit - many sports, many schools. Vanderbilt had a player on the list. It was orchestrated by Texas Trial Group. But people who want to hate Kiffin will hate Kiffin. I’ve been there.

The SEC voted 16-0 on the pro policy in alignment with the NCAA. But that was under the condition that if the rule was determined to be illegal by a court, the conference would abide by the court order. Sankey said so himself.

And here we are.
Posted by grizzlylongcut
Member since Sep 2021
16197 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:13 am to
quote:

It’s their choice who is eligible to participate within their conference.


You’re essentially saying that they will just pick and choose what rules to follow.
Posted by scottydoesntknow
Member since Nov 2023
11022 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:15 am to
quote:

I ask you again: Can the SEC ban its members from recruiting black players?


That would be against the law. Judge RayRay in East Baton Rouge doesnt make law
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter