Started By
Message

re: The actual text of the text message

Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:30 am to
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50399 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:30 am to
quote:

The technology exists to know whether or not he viewed this text.


And he willingly gave the police his phone, so they know. It's pretty clear he didn't know what was going on.
Posted by EarlyCuyler3
Appalachia
Member since Nov 2017
27290 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:31 am to
quote:

What’s funny is that an internet jackass like me is able to easily shed light on how dubious the handling of this situation has been.


Yes, because I'm sure you know all the details of what has been done.

Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28585 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:32 am to
quote:

It's pretty clear he didn't know what was going on.


No, it’s not clear at all, because we have no confirmation as to whether he read the text message prior to delivering the gun nor has there been any confirmation as to whether anyone has even inquired into this question.
Posted by JTA1985
Member since Feb 2012
3185 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:33 am to
Miller was an accessory to murder and Alabama is trying to cover it up.
Posted by WildcatMike
Lexington, KY
Member since Dec 2005
41531 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:33 am to
Media is going to punch holes in this case. This is not over!
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65042 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:34 am to
quote:

IF it is confirmed he read the text, and still delivered the gun, would you agree he should be kicked off the team?



No, because he claims that he didn't even know the gun was in the car. You can choose to believe that or not, but assuming he read the text prior to arrival, and assuming he didn't know the gun was in the car, he was probably confused by that text.

Also...let's keep in mind that "[gun]" was not part of the text. Brackets indicate that the author of the article is attempting to translate the word "joint" for the reader.
Posted by SingleMalt1973
Member since Feb 2022
11896 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:35 am to
quote:

If they know he read the text and he hasn't been charged, this is a massive miscarriage of justice.


Don’t be surprised when the trial starts that Miller is on the list of witnesses for the Prosecution. The DA has said as much that he is a cooperating witness. Bradley will be one too. Pretty obvious they cut a deal to avoid any charges, which was smart and good representation by their attorneys.
Posted by SingleMalt1973
Member since Feb 2022
11896 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:35 am to
quote:

No, because he claims that he didn't even know the gun was in the car.


Link?
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Brackets indicate that the author of the article is attempting to translate the word "joint" for the reader.
No it doesn’t. It indicates the testimony of what the police determined was being referenced.
Posted by GetmorewithLes
UK Basketball Fan
Member since Jan 2011
19053 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:36 am to
quote:

But he could have seen the text without even clicking specifically on the text to go into messages- depending on how he has his phone set up.


Good chance he has an apple watch. That raises the chance that he saw it instantly. ...and maybe not.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65042 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:37 am to
quote:

Link?


From his attorney's statement:


This post was edited on 2/24/23 at 8:38 am
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:38 am to
Which part says he didn’t know the gun was in his car?
This post was edited on 2/24/23 at 8:40 am
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65042 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:40 am to
quote:

Which part says he didn’t know the gun was in his car?



Where it says he never saw the gun. If that isn't definitive enough for you, guess what? The burden of proof isn't on Miller, it's on those who are accusing him.

Can you PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt that he knew the gun was in the back seat of his car?
This post was edited on 2/24/23 at 8:42 am
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Where it says he never saw the gun.
But conveniently in his attorney’s self serving press release didn’t say he didn’t know it was in his car. I wonder why? You understand he can be aware that a gun was left in his car without ever looking back to see it, right?
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:43 am to
quote:

Can you PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt that he knew the gun was in the back seat of his car?
I certainly have enough circumstantial evidence for PC.
Posted by WildcatMike
Lexington, KY
Member since Dec 2005
41531 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:43 am to
quote:

From his attorney's statement:


The media is already questioning some of those statements. The lawyer press release will probably backfire on Miller.
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22151 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:43 am to
quote:

From his attorney's statement:


That does not state that he did not know the gun was in the car. It states that Miller "never saw the handgun" and "never handled it." That doesn't mean he didn't know it was there. You fell for a carefully crafted statement by an attorney.
Posted by SingleMalt1973
Member since Feb 2022
11896 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:43 am to
It says he never saw or handled it, the text says bring me my “joint” hood rat equivalent of gun. The attorney never says Brandon didn’t read the text. He claims Miller is completely innocent but stops short of totally clearing him by including that fact. Why wouldn’t he go that far? It doesn’t matter if he never saw it or handled it if he knew he was taking a gun. The statement never says he didn’t know it was in the vehicle. It is implied but it can still be true he didn’t see it or handle it but knew it was in the car and he was taking it to Miles.

ETA- so far Millers whole defense is Plausible Deniability which does not look good.
This post was edited on 2/24/23 at 8:46 am
Posted by SneezyBeltranIsHere
Member since Jul 2021
2452 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:44 am to
quote:

No, because he claims that he didn't even know the gun was in the car. You can choose to believe that or not, but assuming he read the text prior to arrival, and assuming he didn't know the gun was in the car, he was probably confused by that text.


Miller's attorney said Miles texted him and asked Miller to bring him his gun.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65042 posts
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:45 am to
quote:

I certainly have enough circumstantial evidence for PC.



Then charge him.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter