Started By
Message
That’s why Drink said that…
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:28 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:28 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 1:46 pm
9
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:34 pm to Raging Tiger
Didn't Drink say it was unfair to the student-athlete?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:36 pm to Raging Tiger
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:42 pm to Raging Tiger
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:43 pm to Raging Tiger
So, does this mean that Missouri purposely influenced him to do this?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:44 pm to Raging Tiger
I would think this would be easily tossed. It’s ultimately up to the coach whether or not a player is allowed to join a team if all other eligibility barriers are cleared. No one has to take anybody if they feel like they’re unfit for their roster.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:44 pm to Raging Tiger
He's gonna lose that suit. Mizzou doesn't have to declare him anything. It's one thing for the conferences to ban the class of 22 (either directly or indirectly by punishing schools), it's a totally different thing for an individual team to say we don't need or want this athlete. Due to competition, cost, etc., the latter happens to every player sooner or later.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 12:47 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:48 pm to TigerLunatik
Has to be right? No player would ever consider trying to make money and better themselves on their own. It has to be some corrupt coach, twisting his mustache and hatching devious plans, that entice these players.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:54 pm to Raging Tiger
I'd bury his arse on the depth chart
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:55 pm to Raging Tiger
"any related bylaw, rule, or policy"
Damn, that shite is going to be laughed at. That could be interpreted as damn near anything that would make him ineligible.
Damn, that shite is going to be laughed at. That could be interpreted as damn near anything that would make him ineligible.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 1:25 pm to Raging Tiger
That's a lawyer pushing a sucker into more billable hours.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 1:27 pm to Drydock
quote:
That's a lawyer pushing a sucker into more billable hours
Agreed but when the athlete is somehow associated with LSU it has to be Kiffin behind it.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 1:28 pm to Drydock
quote:
That's a lawyer pushing a sucker into more billable hours.
Same logic doesn’t apply to the 4 players (out of 300+) that LSU has spoken to though?
Weird.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 1:36 pm to wdhalgren
quote:
He's gonna lose that suit. Mizzou doesn't have to declare him anything. It's one thing for the conferences to ban the class of 22 (either directly or indirectly by punishing schools), it's a totally different thing for an individual team to say we don't need or want this athlete. Due to competition, cost, etc., the latter happens to every player sooner or later.
The SEC has everyone in legal hot water.
Trying to bully schools into defying a court order.
LSU is true 100% American and respects the justice system
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 1:37 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News