Started By
Message

re: Sugar Bowl conundrum: the SEC representative usually doesn't want to be there.

Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:26 am to
Posted by LC412000
Any location where a plane flies
Member since Mar 2004
16673 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:26 am to
thatdude1985 <<<===== is a great Alabama fan, did not even attend the game
Posted by stevo1905
Member since Nov 2010
2082 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:26 am to
quote:

I don't really think last night was a case of bama not wanting to be there... they scored first afterall. OU got outstanding QB play and bama turned the ball over.
Posted by Bubba Bexley
Member since May 2007
3579 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:26 am to
quote:

What's the SEC's record in Sugar Bowls in the BCS era?

I'm standing by.


I think the original poster is referencing the time since a standalone NCG was added, not the entire BCS era.
Posted by Wild Thang
YAW YAW Fooball Nation
Member since Jun 2009
44181 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:28 am to
Cry some more
Posted by SquirrelyBama
Member since Nov 2011
6389 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:29 am to
The SEC regular season stage is bigger, no doubt
2nd, 3rd, and 4th place are usually in the Title hunt
But still, you've gotta play hard

I can't get upset at the players when I'm not even excited bout the game myself. It's only normal when expectations are so high all year, and Bama is their worst enemy with all that. You can say all the right things, but you can't fake passion heading into a game. Oklahoma played lights out and deserves total credit for doing so. They came to play and brought the wood last night. SEC teams can get away with this against overmatched opponents, but do this against programs that have playmakers. You'll get you're tail handed to you if you disrespect your opponent. Bama deserved all they got for not respecting Oklahoma and some humble-pie will do the youth good moving forward.

How many times do we gotta see this play out
To realize this isn't an anomaly though
Posted by Camp Randall
The Shadow of the Valley of Death
Member since Nov 2005
17421 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:31 am to
Agreed. Crank up the latest Daniel Moore painting.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:33 am to
LSU won in 2001, 2003, 2006, and 2007 in title game.

I don't think we mind it.
Posted by JEAUXBLEAUX
Bayonne, NJ
Member since May 2006
55375 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:35 am to
as long as the SEC winner goes to the playoffs and the loser goes here, it will almost be an afterthought. proof we are so spoiled
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
63941 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:37 am to
quote:

some humble-pie will do the youth good moving forward


This was my only thought during the game last night. Our players needed a wake up call. I would have preferred that wake up call come during the game but during the offseason will be fine too.
This post was edited on 1/3/14 at 8:38 am
Posted by aggressor
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2011
9405 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:38 am to
It's a valid point but its also crazy. The Sugar Bowl is awesome. The only problem I have with it is they don't have it on New Year's Day at night anymore. Nothing like getting absolutely blitzed on Bourbon Street on NYE and then having enough time to sleep in and re-energize before walking over to the game.

I do think some SEC schools have taken it for granted and its a shame. It's still the signature SEC bowl for the old timers.
Posted by TroyTider
Florida Panhandle
Member since Oct 2009
4016 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:40 am to
quote:

Seems like only Bama and Florida don't want to be there.


Bama and UF have won 5 of the past 7 NC's.
So yes, it's not always meaningful when they play in the Sugar bowl.
Great point by you
Posted by The Calvin
Member since Jun 2013
5240 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:41 am to
thatlsuobsesseddude


Oh and we actually show up for our sugar bowls and don't choke to vastly inferior opponents. Thanks for making the SEC look like a bunch of pretenders
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88765 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:42 am to
quote:

So yes, it's not always meaningful when they play in the Sugar bowl.


You, getting upset on a national stage is really showing us
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
61463 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:44 am to
I don't know about that. LSU sure came to play against Notre Dame. Highly motivated.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
113721 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:44 am to
quote:

a lot of truth to that.....SEC teams don't show up in Sugar Bowls.....except if it's for the NC


Funny...LSU has played in 2 non-NC Sugars in the BCS era and kicked the shite out of its opponent both times (Illinois & ND).
Posted by TroyTider
Florida Panhandle
Member since Oct 2009
4016 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:45 am to
Better for the players and coaches to be mad and upset after losing than happy about it. Glad they're not used to it like some.
Posted by brewhan davey
Audubon Place
Member since Sep 2010
33316 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:46 am to
quote:

a lot of truth to that.....SEC teams don't show up in Sugar Bowls.....except if it's for the NC. heylsu


Last time LSU played in the actual Sugar Bowl for the MNC (and not the separate BCSNCG), they beat Oklahoma.

The 2011 and 2007 games were not the Sugar Bowl FYI.

But, nice melt
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88765 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:49 am to
quote:

Better for the players and coaches to be mad and upset after losing than happy about it


Who has been happy about losing?
Posted by BuccWildBammer
AL
Member since Nov 2011
23340 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:51 am to
Les is just used to coaching a team not playing for the title

Bama's season was over after the AU loss
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter