Favorite team:US Space Force 
Location:Over your left shoulder
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:119145
Registered on:11/26/2006
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Paying for all of them could quickly consume most of the politically unifying tax-rate increases on corporations and wealthy individuals


Excuse me?
Those violent white supremacists... you know, the greatest threat to "our democracy" can't hold a candle to the violence from the Left.

re: White democrats in 2026....

Posted by udtiger on 11/15/26 at 9:24 am to
quote:

You can’t answer my question, and you are calling names.

L

Good day


I did answer your question. You question is based on a faulty premise: that there is any validity to the "34 felonies" or the Carroll verdict.

There isn't and only the most hopeless shills believe that anything even approaching justice occurred in either case.

But, you do you.
quote:

Wtf are you talking about


I think he's talking about the media, not the reality.

Was watching late games and every halftime/update started with Arch's heroic drive to win the game at the end.

re: White democrats in 2026....

Posted by udtiger on 11/15/26 at 9:17 am to
quote:

Right. So a person who voted for him in 2024 is ok with forcible digital penetration in addition to his 34 felony convictions.


The 34 felonies are going to disappear in the appellate court.

And if you honestly believe the outcome of the Carroll trial, you are just the sort of soft-brained retard Gordon and Debosier love to have on their juries.

re: White democrats in 2026....

Posted by udtiger on 11/15/26 at 9:02 am to
quote:

* “…the fact that Mr. Trump sexually abused - indeed, raped - Ms. Carroll has been conclusively established and is binding in this case.” - Carroll v Trump II


But for judicial immunity, the judge could be sued for slander/libel.

The jury SPECIFICALLY held Trump did not rape her.

Remember, this was a civil case where the burden of proof was "preponderance of the evidence" and was wholly based on circumstantial evidence (since she could not remember key details [like the date, month or even year it happened - thus making it impossible to present evidence of Trump's schedule to refute the claim]).

re: This team plays with heart

Posted by udtiger on 11/15/26 at 7:28 am to
Sadly, not always with their heads.
So what? What did you think would happen? Of course the follower of that gutter faith will place his hand on the tome of apostasy and lie that he will support and defend the Constitution of the United Statea.

Taqiyya, it's what's for breakfast.
quote:

The left calls tax cuts "wealth redistribution", as if me keeping more of the money I worked to produce is taking it away from someone else who earned it by sitting at home.


You have to understand, the Left/Dems consider ALL of your money and wealth theirs and any policy that "allows" you to keep it and use it as you please is unfair.
quote:

Moving people and things safely is kind of important…can we please get anyone who has at least worked in industry or has really good exec experience?


DCA crash literally 2 days after he's sworn in and then this ground stop that appears to be a DEI contractor special.

Please tell me: a) how these are his fault and b) how else you believe he's failed at DOT? The fact you never hear his name means he's probably doing his job.
Of course.

Because all it takes is a change in party for an unindicted co-conspirator in terrorism cases to stop being a terrorist organization.

In that vein, why in the frick has Trump not declared it one?
quote:

quote:
Tired of seeing offenses dog walk the defense at the end of games


You wouldn’t have to see it if the offense could put the game away when given 4 straight chances to do so


This.

FFS, I have jumped Baker's and the defense's asses plenty this season, but this one is NOT on them. Yes, Key fricked up on the last play, but that last play doesn't happen if the offense does its fricking job on ANY of the previous FOUR possessions (and don't even get me started on Leavitt's TWO INTs in the endzone).

Offense/Leavitt
Offensive playcalling
Special Teams

...

Officiating (holding legal until the 4th Quarter, and only against LSU)

...


Defense (and, frankly' only Key's frickup)

re: White democrats in 2026....

Posted by udtiger on 11/15/26 at 6:14 am to
quote:

I think you're being a little dramatic


I think the last 30-40 years of demographic change - and the overt statements of those pushing for a more "diverse" society - say otherwise.
quote:

Very sad. Depriving kids of so much.


Yes. There's a lot to be said for the educational environment of living in constant fear of being bullied and attacked because of your race, or your failure to support the latest rainbow causes, or random gang violence.

quote:

Seems like someone is mad they have to shut down the fig parade so they are trying to ruin st Patrick's day as collateral damage to stick it to the chuds


Ding!

re: Its NOT the QB!

Posted by udtiger on 11/15/26 at 5:44 am to
Ummm...

It's the QB.

No. 2 is offensive play calling.

No. 3 is special (ed) teams.

re: Texas at LSU

Posted by udtiger on 11/14/26 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

Leavitt threw 3 interceptions in the end zone.


I mist have missed one. I thought "only" 2

re: Scott Starzyk loss this game

Posted by udtiger on 11/14/26 at 10:46 pm to
quote:

2 picks inside the red zone is inexcusable


Teo.picks in the endzone
quote:

Shanks kicks during clutch moments.


Not just in clutch moments

He's bad.

Really bad.

My almost 60 year old arse could do better