Started By
Message

re: So...the NCAA investigators / Miss. State made shite up?

Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:24 am to
Posted by Drebin
Member since Aug 2017
4446 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:24 am to
quote:

We arent facing a second year bowl ban and an already ruined recruiting class if it isn't for the second NOA which is all MSU snitching.



This is another Reb narrative that isn't even remotely close to being true. Even if they threw the Lewis stuff out, you still have something like 15 level one violations and you've admitted to more than half of them...some of them while being investigated. The NCAA could throw out the LL stuff and still hammer you to oblivion. They're not throwing it out, though, just so you know.
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:29 am to
quote:

This is another Reb narrative that isn't even remotely close to being true. Even if they threw the Lewis stuff out, you still have something like 15 level one violations and you've admitted to more than half of them...some of them while being investigated. The NCAA could throw out the LL stuff and still hammer you to oblivion. They're not throwing it out, though, just so you know

So when if we are hit with just a 1 year bowl ban because they find yall are full of shite, does that change your mind on this? Does it make you reevaluate that rides, meals, hotel rooms can add up to be a level 1 violation in the new penalty structure, that maybe OM didn't do anything more than anyone else?
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
12525 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:31 am to
quote:

ENFORCEMENT WRITTEN REPLY Case No. 00561 July 21, 2017 Page No. 53

5. Analysis of information. The enforcement staff determined the independent, matching reports from and were compelling and corroborative of one another and show the systematic way in which Kiffin and Farrar arranged the provision of free merchandise. The enforcement staff also notes that has no connection to or and and did not have a meaningful connection to each other during this period that would suggest collusion. The information they provided was also contrary their own interests (with or without limited immunity). As noted previously, the enforcement staff determined and were credible and reliable sources of information and and reports yielded multiple violations acknowledged by the institution. Conversely, there are multiple instances in this case that cast doubt on the credibility of Kiffin, Farrar, and The information in this case also demonstrates that both Farrar and knowingly provided false or misleading information to the enforcement staff and/or the institution.


You are pulling from ole miss’ response. And from the info above, it is found that false and misleading info has been provided by former staff of the athletic department of ole miss.

This post was edited on 11/7/17 at 9:32 am
Posted by Drebin
Member since Aug 2017
4446 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:31 am to
quote:

This thread is fantastic. Mississippians accusing other Mississippians of below average intelligence and lack of reading comprehension. If you are taking any statement at face value issued by any party involved in this matter then you lack the common sense of a peanut. However, it has become readily apparent that statements given may have included some healthy imagination. This is the norm.


What's in the NOA is validated as fact. What's in the Ole Miss response is their explanation of it. The NCAA's response to that is a smack down of the Rebel stupidity.

The NOA is the only trustworthy source of info in all of this. I know that goes against your "witch hunt" narrative, but it's the truth.
Posted by fillmoregandt
OTM
Member since Nov 2009
14368 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:31 am to
The multi year ban is based on the LOIC charge, which is based on LL and KJ allegations, which is
Posted by r2d2
Member since Dec 2006
6842 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:33 am to
Quoting Tim Brando “Ole Miss I have news for you: You are Ole Miss.” Even without NCAA concerns that is all you need to know.
Posted by Herman Frisco
Bon Secour
Member since Sep 2008
17264 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:33 am to
If I was a OM fan I would keep my mouth shut until the letter is released. Then either cry or crow..
This post was edited on 11/7/17 at 9:36 am
Posted by Drebin
Member since Aug 2017
4446 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:34 am to
quote:

So when if we are hit with just a 1 year bowl ban because they find yall are full of shite, does that change your mind on this? Does it make you reevaluate that rides, meals, hotel rooms can add up to be a level 1 violation in the new penalty structure, that maybe OM didn't do anything more than anyone else?



First of all that's not going to happen. You're getting another ban and more scholarships docked.

But if you get away with it, all of that just means you are better at cheating than everyone else, not that you're doing what everyone is doing, which is another stupid Rebel narrative. Half of the NCAA FBS turned your asses in.
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:36 am to
quote:

What's in the NOA is validated as fact

No its not dude. Damn. If it was then there wouldn't be a hearing. Just here is what we found and here is your penalty. Did you not follow the UNC case at all? The people who draw up the NOA are completely separate from the people who deliver the penalty. The enforcement arm of the ncaa are just as bias as OM is.
This post was edited on 11/7/17 at 9:37 am
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:37 am to
quote:

If I was a OM fan I would keep my mouth shut until the letter is released. Then either cry or crow..

I'd take a bath if I were you.
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:41 am to
quote:

that maybe OM didn't do anything more than anyone else?


No one believes this, it got way out of hand, sloppy, and public and that is what got you guys busted.

quote:

yall are full of shite


who is yall?

I would agree that most of it is nonsense (rides, meals, hotel rooms) but those are the rules and OM dared the NCAA to call them on it, dumb move.



Posted by AllUrCrootsRBlong2Us
Member since Jan 2016
599 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:43 am to
quote:

What's in the NOA is validated as fact.
NOA - Notice of ALLEGATION.

allegation
[al-i-gey-shuh?n]
noun

the act of alleging; affirmation.

an assertion made with little or no proof.

Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:44 am to
quote:

But if you get away with it, all of that just means you are better at cheating than everyone else

So we are better at cheating than anyone else when we hand over the text that implicated the booster with leo and barney? That Freeze doesn't use a burner phone to contact hookers? We are the best cheaters when Leo, Simmons, Redmond, Peters, Dear, Green, Bryant, etc end up at State? What is in the NOA? We are the best cheaters because we gave rides to players, paid for hotels, and meals? What is in the noa that avoids muli year bowl ban that makes us the best cheaters? It was a 6 year investigation where our compliance gave the ncaa the silver bullet and our rival had players snitch, so if we get away with just 1 year bowl ban its not that we didn't do anything egregious, its that the school that couldn't get out of their own way is this master cheater. Do you hear how brain washed you are? No matter what players go to MSU, no matter how long the investigation, no matter what tools the investigative arm uses, if OM doesn't get what you want as a penalty then they got away with murder, not they didn't commit murder.
Posted by yatesdog38
in your head rent free
Member since Sep 2013
12737 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:44 am to
[fixing large batch of chips and rotel dip need something more filling than popcorn]
Posted by Drebin
Member since Aug 2017
4446 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:45 am to
quote:

No its not dude. Damn. If it was then there wouldn't be a hearing. Just here is what we found and here is your penalty. Did you not follow the UNC case at all? The people who draw up the NOA are completely separate from the people who deliver the penalty. The enforcement arm of the ncaa are just as bias as OM is.


That's your story and you're sticking to it, I see.

Why isn't the Tunsil draft night revelation in the NOA? No, not because it didn't happen. It clearly happened. The NCAA couldn't verify it. That should scare the piss out of you. The stuff that's in the NOA is stuff they were able to verify and validate.

You cite the North Carolina ruling like it has some sort of precedent here. There is no relationship. But that said, the investigative staff found that athletes were taking bogus courses. That's not disputed by the COI. They didn't penalize NC because those courses were available to all students, not just student athletes. The NCAA investigation didn't fail....the COI just determined that athletes weren't getting benefits over and above normal students.

In this case you have what, 16 level one violations? Cash inducements. Disassociated boosters. ACT fraud. You've got a text from a booster to a coach admitted that they'd wasted $10.000. You've got a student athlete giving testimony so descriptive as to be able to identify boosters from a photo array and describe the multiple vehicles they were driving in detail. You've got three people who didn't know each other give similar testimony about the RR gear. And you guys think the COI is going to throw this stuff out?

I suggest everyone go back and read the NCAA's final response to the Ole Miss response of the NOA. The language was especially harsh.
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:46 am to
quote:

who is yall? I would agree that most of it is nonsense (rides, meals, hotel rooms) but those are the rules and OM dared the NCAA to call them on it, dumb move.

The other state fans in this thread. Hell one above you said we were the best cheaters in the business and we did do things others didn't. If you are one of the rare msu fans that acknowledges everyone cheats, but OM got sloppy about it, then I commend you and whoever used "yall" wasn't referring to you. Just the ones who support writing a book about this crap.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
12525 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:48 am to

quote:

Just here is what we found and here is your penalty


This crying and claims of a witch hunt has seriously begun to bore everyone. It is especially boring when the following is true.

quote:


independent, matching reports from and were compelling and corroborative of one another and show the systematic way in which Kiffin and Farrar arranged the provision of free merchandise


You do know that independent means separate from the NCAA and matching means there is more than one source right?

And let’s not forget arranged where Kiffin and Farrar allowed the merchandise to be given.
Posted by Vecchio Cane
Ivory Tower
Member since Jul 2016
17722 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:48 am to
quote:

If it was then there wouldn't be a hearing.


A hearing where OM tried to present SCREENSHOTS OF A FAKE TWITTER ACCOUNT as evidence that LL lied to investigators


I'm going to be truly sad when this circus ends
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Why isn't the Tunsil draft night revelation in the NOA? No, not because it didn't happen. It clearly happened. The NCAA couldn't verify it. That should scare the piss out of you. The stuff that's in the NOA is stuff they were able to verify and validate.

There is a difference in choosing the put things you believe you can prove in the noa versus everything in the noa is already proven. If that were the case there wouldn't be a hearing. If that were the case then OM paid leo 15K and we will get the multi year ban. So given you believe this you believe there is no way out of the multiyear ban. I'll ask again, if its 1 year, do you take a step back and realize you are wrong and you have been brainwashed or are you staying in your "I don't care what the facts say, I want to stay in the dark and believe what I want to believe" boat?
This post was edited on 11/7/17 at 9:51 am
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 9:52 am to
quote:

A hearing where OM tried to present SCREENSHOTS OF A FAKE TWITTER ACCOUNT as evidence that LL lied to investigators

I would imagine its hard to believe anything OM says when you believe Yancy is the representative of OM and where you get all your OM news. This is beyond false.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter