Started By
Message
re: So it begins - LSU rumored to make deal with PE
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:15 pm to tigerbait2010
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:15 pm to tigerbait2010
quote:
It’ll be so bad you’ll have to keep posting about LSU at 3 am for at least another decade
Just like LSU posts about Bama indefinitely?
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:17 pm to TheTideMustRoll
quote:
LSU has officially entered their "I can't keep up with my loan payments, maybe what I need is another loan to pay off some of my previous loans!" phase of their existence. Fitting for a program that is the equivalent of a trailer park.
Alabama football will be entering into a similar fundraising path within 3 years, you just don't realize it yet.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:19 pm to tigerbait2010
quote:
Good luck raising that 100 mill from your donors, poors
Funny, we did $241 Million without selling our souls.
OU Raises $241 Million
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:21 pm to tigerbait2010
This isn't a difficult conversation
It's selling future cash flows in order to cover current/future liabilities. The issue is those future deficits are only going to grow by whatever haircut the university is taking on this exchange. The whole option to buy back those revenues is redundant as the university will still be operating at a deficit, they won't have the capital to exercise it
It's selling future cash flows in order to cover current/future liabilities. The issue is those future deficits are only going to grow by whatever haircut the university is taking on this exchange. The whole option to buy back those revenues is redundant as the university will still be operating at a deficit, they won't have the capital to exercise it
This post was edited on 8/3/26 at 10:23 pm
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:22 pm to No Colors
quote:
Our Athletic Director was a private equity principal before he took this job. Wonder why he didn't get the Stephens boys to cut Ole Miss a similar deal? Because he knows better. That's why.
Kieeeeeeef!!!! R&R!
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:24 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Alabama football will be entering into a similar fundraising path within 3 years, you just don't realize it yet.
Even if this is true, somehow I feel like we will take a wiser path than, "We give you $100m now, you give us 10% of your future earnings from now until the end of time."
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:26 pm to OleVaught14
This sort of ownership likely isn't what you want. They are focused on the bottom line. It is likely from a purely financial standpoint a team can make more money by being very good and filling the seats, but not going all in to win. Think Liberty Media and the Braves versus The Dodgers ownership. The Braves needed pitching. They signed a guy that is a number 4 starter at best. The Dodgers signed a frontline guy just so other teams didn't get him. Liberty Media likely realizes that the financials between bowing out in the first or second round aren't that different versus winning it all and it may be better not to blow up the payroll.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:26 pm to TheTideMustRoll
quote:
Even if this is true, somehow I feel like we will take a wiser path than, "We give you $100m now, you give us 10% of your future earnings from now until the end of time."
Maybe, but if I told you 3 years ago that Alabama would give a raise/extension to a head coach that was averaging 4 losses a year, you would have also felt like Alabama would be wiser than that, I'm sure.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:28 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Maybe, but if I told you 3 years ago that Alabama would give a raise/extension to a head coach that was averaging 4 losses a year, you would have also felt like Alabama would be wiser than that, I'm sure.
Oh oh!! Now do Brian Kelly!
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:29 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Maybe, but if I told you 3 years ago that Alabama would give a raise/extension to a head coach that was averaging 4 losses a year, you would have also felt like Alabama would be wiser than that, I'm sure.
This is such a stupid, twisted gotcha take.
He went 9-3 in his first year and lost a meaningless bowl game.
He went 10-2 in his second year, lost the SEC Championship Game, won a CFP road game and lost to the first team in history to go 16-0.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:34 pm to TideSaint
quote:
This is such a stupid, twisted gotcha take.
He went 9-3 in his first year and lost a meaningless bowl game.
He went 10-2 in his second year, lost the SEC Championship Game, won a CFP road game and lost to the first team in history to go 16-0.
Basically, finishing inside the top 10 equates to a raise/extension at Alabama now, even if you did get blown out in 2 of your final 3 games.
It's not necessarily a shot at Alabama, just proof that everything has changed and craziness abounds.
Sometime very soon, this will just be semipro football, players will be university employees, and a lot of traditions and other good things will go by the wayside in pursuit of the almighty dollar.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:36 pm to SoonerKA1999
quote:
Oh oh!! Now do Brian Kelly!
Brian Kelly never received a raise or extension at LSU, despite also reaching the SECCG and finishing with a better record over his first two seasons.
If you've already given someone an insane contract, there's no point in doubling down until they really win something IMO.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:40 pm to SidewalkTiger
Honestly I’d just take a breather from the thread. If everyone were honest no one but Texas and Aggie can sustain the current model for another decade. Just like when they laughed at LSU’s jersey patches and following suit, their athletic departments will announce some spruced up version of PE of a deal with PE. Hell Kentucky is already an LLC
the cats will go first with their legal status.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:43 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Brian Kelly never received a raise or extension at LSU, despite also reaching the SECCG and finishing with a better record over his first two seasons.
If you've already given someone an insane contract, there's no point in doubling down until they really win something IMO.
But you all bought out his contract and it put you all in the poor house.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:43 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
You’re just sad the “LSU is broke” tired line can’t be used anymore. It was false before and if this is true, it’s definitely still false.
If it makes you understand better, this is like eating seed corn. That's not me gloating or anything either; we're probably all about to do it. Everything is getting worse in college football.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:44 pm to SECCaptain
PE firm would make their money back in 8-10 years then be entitled to a $10M cash flow with zero overhead FOREVER. Lmao what a suckers deal.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:47 pm to tigerbait2010
quote:
Honestly I’d just take a breather from the thread. If everyone were honest no one but Texas and Aggie can sustain the current model for another decade. Just like when they laughed at LSU’s jersey patches and following suit, their athletic departments will announce some spruced up version of PE of a deal with PE. Hell Kentucky is already an LLC the cats will go first with their legal status.
For sure.
Most here are just whistling past the graveyard. It's almost a perfect facsimile of the patch thread a year ago and now everyone is looking to secure a patch sponsor ASAP.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:51 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Basically, finishing inside the top 10 equates to a raise/extension at Alabama now, even if you did get blown out in 2 of your final 3 games.
Imagine giving a guy a bigger contract for not being able to do even that.
This post was edited on 8/3/26 at 10:52 pm
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:52 pm to SidewalkTiger
I think it’s interesting that Jackie has framed the concept to make us an NIL machine but the rant is framing it as is merely not being able to service debts. I’m going to go with the guy who made them all sound retarded last fall
Popular
Back to top



0





