Started By
Message

re: Since when is a free ride through college not enough?

Posted on 8/29/20 at 12:04 pm to
Posted by Skyler97
Member since Mar 2014
4482 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

This isn't the fault of the NCAA schools. The NFL uses the schools as a minor league to develop talent. The NFL draft and signing rules are completely on them and has nothing to do with the NCAA. Don't blame the NCAA, blame the NFL.



Okay, so we agree not to blame the players.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42565 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 12:07 pm to
it is amazing how some cannot understand this concept.
Posted by Godawgs4
Member since Aug 2016
4251 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 12:08 pm to
Quote


“Alright, fine. We can pay them $100k/year. In return, they are now listed as employees of the university. Their scholarships, free meals, free premier housing, and whatever other free shite they get is gone too. No more lowering admissions standards.“

Plus they now pay taxes/social security/Medicaid on that income. No more free stuff. Wonder how that would go over?

Actions can result in consequences. Be careful of what you wish for because it might just happen.
Posted by BornAndRaised_LA
Springfield, VA
Member since Oct 2018
5228 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 12:25 pm to
Don’t we already pay kids that are receiving academic scholarships for any other work they do on campus? Why can we cover all of their tuition/classes and books yet still pay them for doing jobs on campus...however trivial... and we can’t cover an athlete’s school as well as their HOURS of practice, travel, etc?

The academic gets school plus pay if they work, but the athlete gets school only, despite earning the university millions that the academic doesn’t.

So...it’s good enough for one group, but not those in the other group.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

Is your contention that no one would have paid Burrow, Lawrence, Fields, Hurts, CEH, etc for their likeness simply because minor league baseball players are anonymous?


Why pick just a small portion of what I said. Let me show you the portion of my quote you chose to leave out:

You do realize that most minor league players do not make as much as the NCAA players do when you take into account Tuition, books, trainers, doctors, room, board, coaching etc right?

Do you see the words, ..."most minor league players..."

See the word "MOST"? You just named 5 players out of the thousands that play college football. Now, I am not sure how it is in your world, but in my world 5 players does not constitute the majority of college football players.

Of course there are those who would pay the 5 players money. But there are thousands who play football. Show me again how my statement is incorrect?

quote:

That’s a pretty bad argument.


No. the argument is spot on. Most minor league players do not get compensated for their likenesses, and most college football players would not get paid for their likeness.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Why can we cover all of their tuition/classes and books yet still pay them for doing jobs on campus...however trivial... and we can’t cover an athlete’s school as well as their HOURS of practice, travel, etc?

Because their tuition, books, food, raining, doctors, insurance etc is their pay for their practice hours.

Let me ask you this. In all seriousness, if the football players and basketball players get paid, how long do you think it would be before the baseball players, equestrian team etc demand to get paid? And, of course with Title IX you can bet your bottom dollar that the women are going to demand to be paid, and demand to be paid as much as the men. If you think I am wrong you had better look up the crap the women's soccer team stirred up over equal pay even though they did not bring in nearly the same amount of money.
Posted by Smell the crawfish
In enemy territory
Member since Nov 2018
1542 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 1:50 pm to
I understand what you are trying to say, but you are cheering for individual players even though you may not realize it. For example, most college football fans are clued to their tvs/computers on signing day hoping your school will land Billy Bob because he's a stud and would help your team tremendously. In the SEC, you don't win without very talented players as you can see with Arkansas! I love LSU and support the team, but I realize without getting very talented players we're not winning a Natty! Just like when a big-time player goes down, you're hoping he comes back as soon as possible and that's basically pulling for an individual player.
Posted by Godawgs4
Member since Aug 2016
4251 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 1:52 pm to
Simple solution is if they want to get paid, then skip college and go straight to the pros.

That would open up scholarships for students who want to earn an education while playing a sport in college. Which is about 99+% of them currently. Let the others shop themselves out to the pros when they complete high school.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Individually, you are correct. My comments in this thread however relate to the value of the players as a whole and their ability to negotiate their share and whether a scholarship alone is sufficient.

Fair enough. How much do you think the following is worth?

Tuition
Books
Food
Personal Trainer
coaches
Room
Stipend
Insurance
Tutors

For say....one year? Keep in mind that teams have 85 scholarship players on the team and they all get these benefits.

They get more monetary value from playing college football than I did at my full time job.
This post was edited on 8/29/20 at 1:59 pm
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

Simple solution is if they want to get paid, then skip college and go straight to the pros.


I think the sticking point to that is the NFL rules prohibit that. A player cannot enter the NFL until their HS class finishes their thrid year of college. I am pretty sure this is correct. But the reasoning behind this is because most players bodies would not be sufficiently developed straight out of high school to stand up under the pounding the NFL dishes out.

quote:

Let the others shop themselves out to the pros when they complete high school.


Which would work for baseball and to a lesser degree basketball. Think about it. Very, very, very few basketball players go straight to the pros. It would be much fewer football players.
Posted by Globetrotter747
Member since Sep 2017
4311 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Since they started supporting entire athletic programs.


Well, they can go find investors and start their own frickin' league and stay away from the colleges and see how that works out for them.

There are plenty of twenty something people walking around in this country with football talent equal to what you would find at the Power 5 level. Players who are only a year or two removed from playing college ball themselves that weren't good enough for the NFL (or too stupid for college in the first place). The athleticism of those guys is as useless as tits on a bull because without a built-in fan base no one cares what they do.

The recently defunct AAF had several well known former college players and coaches and didn't even last a damn season before folding.

It's the programs, not the players.
Posted by BornAndRaised_LA
Springfield, VA
Member since Oct 2018
5228 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 2:30 pm to
Honestly, the key is to separate college from NFL prep. Build an NFL prep D-League, pay them, and if they want a degree they can get it on their own time.
Posted by J2thaROC
Member since May 2018
13020 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 2:39 pm to
When coaches started getting paid ridiculous amounts of money, your “entitled” argument went out the window.
Posted by 4Ghost
Member since Sep 2016
8518 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 2:54 pm to
They are the most pampered people in the USA. Meals, personal trainers, personal tutors that go to class with and for them. Good Lord.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

Honestly, the key is to separate college from NFL prep. Build an NFL prep D-League, pay them, and if they want a degree they can get it on their own time.


Easier said than done. Universities are monetarily invested to keep the system as is. So, you can't expect them to just dismantle their sports programs. In this case, any league started would then have to go in direct competition with the University system that is set up. they would have to get stadium leases, coaches, workout facilities, insurance, in short somebody with very deep pockets would have to step in to do this.

Now, lets say they do this and are successful. Basketball at the University level is a breakeven proposition at best. Most lose money, but some do breakeven. So, the Universities would pretty much be left with a bunch of sports with no way of paying for them, and would probably disband all athletics except maybe some intramural sports.

Keep in mind that there have been several attempts to go head to head with the NFL and only one was successful. The ole AFL, and they were absorbed by the existing structure. That would not be a viable option in this case.

I mean, what you are proposing sounds great, but it would not be an easy task, and would probably turn out to be impossible for anyone to pull off, even if you had people willing to take the monetary risk necessary to get it started.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

When coaches started getting paid ridiculous amounts of money, your “entitled” argument went out the window.


What in your opinion is ridiculous amounts of money? how much do you think they should cap coaches salaries at?
Posted by BornAndRaised_LA
Springfield, VA
Member since Oct 2018
5228 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

They get more monetary value from playing college football than I did at my full time job.


Take no offense, but at the level of profit LSU football generates, these players are more valuable to their employer than you likely were to yours.
Posted by CaptainBrannigan
Good Ole Rocky Top Tennessee
Member since Jan 2010
21644 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

Alright, fine. We can pay them $100k/year. In return, they are now listed as employees of the university. Their scholarships, free meals, free premier housing, and whatever other free shite they get is gone too. No more lowering admissions standards.


Why do you clowns get so butthurt over this? Why would swimmers get to go to school and get the same benefits as the player who is funding his or her scholarship?
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

Take no offense, but at the level of profit LSU football generates, these players are more valuable to their employer than you likely were to yours.




I don't know. I worked for a billion dollar business. And, no. I am not offended. I understand what you meant.

I retired from Delta Air Lines, btw. Delta had a gross of 47 Billion dollars in 2019.

LINK

Granted Delta has about 70,000, but I would be willing to bet LSU did not take in anywhere near $47 Billion.

ETA
I should have made my point a bit clearer....in that the athletes are al;ready getting far above compensation compared to most people.

To get a good idea, you have to figure out what their scholarships are actually worth.

Room, Board, tuition, books is worth something like $200,000 over 4 years. that is not taking into account, trainers, coaches, tutors etc, so that number would go up exponentially. how many college students do you think are making somewhere around $75,000 a year working? If they go to a private school like GT, ND, Stanford that number goes way, WAY up.
This post was edited on 8/29/20 at 5:36 pm
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 8/29/20 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

Why do you clowns get so butthurt over this? Why would swimmers get to go to school and get the same benefits as the player who is funding his or her scholarship?


I am not him and I don't get upset...but to answer your question...they shouldn't.

But, if the other sports are so unprofitable (And they are) why does the government force them to give away the same number of scholarships to women athletics as they do men's? While this does not answer your question directly, when you follow the logic you will understand that if they start paying men's athletics then they will certainly force them to pay women's athletics.

So, why should women athletes get the same as men athletes if it is the men athletes that bring in the money?

Also keep in mind, though, that there probably are no full ride swimming scholarships.
This post was edited on 8/29/20 at 5:38 pm
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter