Started By
Message
re: Should Modern Bowl Games Even Count Towards a Teams Record?
Posted on 5/3/25 at 3:58 pm to captdalton
Posted on 5/3/25 at 3:58 pm to captdalton
That last "Could not stop em" ... Nick wanted to say "could not fckng stop em".
Posted on 5/3/25 at 3:59 pm to captdalton
Considering we have the most bowl wins of all time, absolutely.
Posted on 5/3/25 at 4:14 pm to tBrand
One NC in five decades.
Pathetic.
Pathetic.
Posted on 5/3/25 at 4:57 pm to captdalton
It’s similar to the entire 2020 season
Posted on 5/3/25 at 5:15 pm to AUTiger789
Notre Dame did not play bowl games because they did not wanna chance losing in the Rose Bowl. Plus in the Rose Bowl they did not have the refs giving them game after game like playing at home or in the Northeastern US. Very similar to how Neyland at Tennessee basically was the head ref in his own games played in Knoxville. 100's of times after plays were over Neyland would bark at the refs and a flag would be thrown.
Posted on 5/3/25 at 5:21 pm to captdalton
If we're taking a poll then mark me down is relegate the bowl game results to the aforementioned scrimmage category and I applaud you for bringing this to our attention.
Posted on 5/3/25 at 5:32 pm to Uhtred
quote:
It’s similar to the entire 2020 season
Sorry you only won 5 regular season games that season.
But yes, your best player did opt out for the whole season.
This post was edited on 5/3/25 at 5:34 pm
Posted on 5/3/25 at 5:48 pm to captdalton
You're not wrong. A lot of bowl rosters don't accurately represent the roster that got them there and it's a real hodge podge of starters and back ups for both teams. I will say, even in losses, somehow these hodge podges have given us some surprisingly exciting games vs Illinois and ND.

Posted on 5/3/25 at 5:52 pm to captdalton
Have you even watched football recently? Opt-outs are at 7-8 year lows. Kids want to play. If they don’t, that’s a stain on the program and you deserve to lose.
Posted on 5/3/25 at 6:48 pm to Dallaswho
quote:
Opt-outs are at 7-8 year lows
Now add in transfers.
Posted on 5/3/25 at 6:56 pm to captdalton
quote:
Now add in transfers.
You mean kids who don’t play for your team? Why would they play for you?
Posted on 5/3/25 at 7:06 pm to Dallaswho
quote:
Why would they play for you?
The question all Missouri players ask themselves.
Posted on 5/3/25 at 7:12 pm to captdalton
quote:
Unless a team makes the playoffs, today’s bowl games feature mass opt outs and transfers. In many match ups, the two teams that play are not the same teams that played during the regular season. In most cases for power 4 teams, non playoff bowls are now glorified 2nd team scrimmages to help prepare for the next season. We don’t count preseason basketball scrimmages towards a team’s record. Should we do the same in football?
Absolutely not.
What do we look like, LSU?
Posted on 5/3/25 at 10:52 pm to TheFourHorsemen
Okay. Well Mississippi lost its relevancy in football because of racism on steroids so everyone has their issues.
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:20 am to captdalton
quote:
opt outs
So now Bama fans say games shouldn’t count because of opt outs….
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:22 am to captdalton
quote:
Unless a team makes the playoffs, today’s bowl games feature mass opt outs and transfers
Yes. Loyalty matters. Don’t sign mercenaries and then bitch about having mercenaries.
Back to top
