16
Started By
Message
SEC Coaches vs. Top 25
Posted on 10/20/26 at 11:00 am
Posted on 10/20/26 at 11:00 am
Some interesting data
Kalen > Kirby
Venables > Sarkisian
Drink is not doing good
Elko and Kiffin are close
Kalen > Kirby
Venables > Sarkisian
Drink is not doing good
Elko and Kiffin are close
Posted on 10/20/26 at 11:02 am to DarthRebel
So much to unpack in this post.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 11:43 am to DarthRebel
Lane Kiffin lol.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 11:53 am to DarthRebel
I thought Texas was good?
Posted on 10/20/26 at 11:54 am to DarthRebel
Damn Drink.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 11:57 am to DarthRebel
This post was edited on 10/20/26 at 11:58 am
Posted on 10/20/26 at 12:00 pm to tiger_nutz
Taking away 5 FAU losses doesn't tie Kiffin for 2nd.
Editing I see.
Editing I see.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 12:04 pm to Crimson Wraith
quote:
Taking away 5 FAU losses doesn't tie Kiffin for 2nd.
Editing I see.
yeahh, my dyslexic arse was wrong
Posted on 10/20/26 at 12:04 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
So much to unpack in this post.
for starters it uses rank at gametime which is dumber than hell
Posted on 10/20/26 at 12:05 pm to DarthRebel
Pete got tossed in the deep end! Hell of a job so far
Posted on 10/20/26 at 12:28 pm to DarthRebel
To recognize that the coaches have coached a different number of games, here is a chart with the numbers adjusted for sample size.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 1:02 pm to DarthRebel
I'm actually shocked Sark has won that many.
I'd rather see a list of how these coaches did against final ap top 25 because the shite early season rankings can skew those numbers.
For instance....Oklahoma got credit for beating the #1 team. We were never the #1 team. We don't even belong in the top 10.
I'd rather see a list of how these coaches did against final ap top 25 because the shite early season rankings can skew those numbers.
For instance....Oklahoma got credit for beating the #1 team. We were never the #1 team. We don't even belong in the top 10.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 1:04 pm to DarthRebel
Kalen was born on 3rd base
Posted on 10/20/26 at 1:16 pm to Uga Alum
Lane was 10-10 at Ole Miss and improved that program each year - he was 0-5 at FAU before that, as they were the annual cupcake for big programs. Anything before that is ancient history pre-Saban rehab.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 1:17 pm to Datalus
quote:
To recognize that the coaches have coached a different number of games, here is a chart with the numbers adjusted for sample size.
That's lame. It's assuming all coaches will only win 44% of their games except the ones they actually played.
It even gives some coaches an increase over reality while giving other a decrease. Because apparently 60 games for Kirby isn't enough and needs to be decreased?
And these are top25 games, not all games.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 1:18 pm to hookem33
quote:
I'd rather see a list of how these coaches did against final ap top 25 because the shite early season rankings can skew those numbers.
Always the better lists.
ETA:
And we should use the CFP final rankings IMO.
This post was edited on 10/20/26 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 10/20/26 at 1:22 pm to DarthRebel
At Cincinnati and Notre Dame, combined, Brian Kelly was 31-28
And he was trash
And he was trash
Posted on 10/20/26 at 1:23 pm to DarthRebel
At UW, Deboer was 12-2 (wild they were 10-1 in one year?)
At Bama he's 6-3, but that is trending in the wrong direction.
At Bama he's 6-3, but that is trending in the wrong direction.
Posted on 10/20/26 at 1:27 pm to DarthRebel
Is a .366 win percentage good?
Posted on 10/20/26 at 1:33 pm to DarthRebel
Sarkisian really sucks
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News