Started By
Message
re: Sark needs to calm down until he wins something. Don't see how this stuff
Posted on 5/22/26 at 8:38 am to koreandawg
Posted on 5/22/26 at 8:38 am to koreandawg
quote:
Sark needs to calm down until he wins something.
If the posters on here would do that.... this place would be a lot quieter.
0
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:21 am to koreandawg
1. It's true
2. It's not about what he did in the Big XII when he was rebuilding after Tom Herman. He's been able to build a talented roster because he was moving to, and is now in, the SEC.
3. He's pissed about Tech buying talent. Tech isn't supposed to that talented
4. He's pissed that the playoff committee doesn't give a damn about strength of schedule
5. He's feeling the heat. It's got to be at least a NC game appearance this year. He needs to chill. Maybe he should try hot yoga.
2. It's not about what he did in the Big XII when he was rebuilding after Tom Herman. He's been able to build a talented roster because he was moving to, and is now in, the SEC.
3. He's pissed about Tech buying talent. Tech isn't supposed to that talented
4. He's pissed that the playoff committee doesn't give a damn about strength of schedule
5. He's feeling the heat. It's got to be at least a NC game appearance this year. He needs to chill. Maybe he should try hot yoga.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:28 am to BebeLudwig7
quote:
bet he’s back on the bottle
Let’s hope not. He needs to shut his mouth and just win on the field. He’s giving bulletin board material out for free. WHY?
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:31 am to Capn_Bevo
quote:
He's pissed about Tech buying talent. Tech isn't supposed to that talented
You goobers spent 40 million on players per year in back to back years and you’re complaining about another team paying for players??
quote:
4. He's pissed that the playoff committee doesn't give a damn about strength of schedule
You had 3 losses, got dominated by Ohio State and lost to 4-8 Florida
And you were 3 plays away from a 6-6 record
At some point strength of schedule can’t help you get to somewhere you clearly don’t belong
This post was edited on 5/22/26 at 9:32 am
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:33 am to Capn_Bevo
quote:
He's feeling the heat. It's got to be at least a NC game appearance this year. He needs to chill. Maybe he should try hot yoga.
That a lot of pressure for an alcoholic to deal with. I think Sark has the best Coaching job in America. There are no excuses for not winning.
I agree, he is feeling the heat and he’s only human. I pray he’s not back on the sauce.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:41 am to Old Sarge
quote:
At some point strength of schedule can’t help you get to somewhere you clearly don’t belong
Funny because A&M was only in the playoffs because of their schedule. And you clearly didn't belong... A&M and Tech scored the same amount of TDs in the playoffs as Texas
Y'all think Elko can beat a team over .500 in conference this year?
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:46 am to koreandawg
Most college football coaches HATE outside distractions. But a few love to create them.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:51 am to tBrand
No A&M was in the playoffs because the only lost 1 game and it was to a good team
You were out of the playoffs because you lost 3 games and one was to a very bad team
You really aren’t that bright are you
You were out of the playoffs because you lost 3 games and one was to a very bad team
You really aren’t that bright are you
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:51 am to tBrand
quote:
he was talking about Rice
Do you really believe that?
quote:
Funny because A&M was only in the playoffs because of their schedule.
Typical UTrans fan. Trying to make a topic about A&M when it has absolutely nothing to do with A&M.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:53 am to koreandawg
Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't Texas have the softest SEC schedule for it's first 2 years in the SEC? Maybe Sark should remember the maxim: "Sometimes the less said: The better."
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:59 am to Old Sarge
quote:
No A&M was in the playoffs because the only lost 1 game and it was to a good team
Yes, because your schedule was literally 7 of the bottom 8 teams in the conference plus Texas, who beat you by double digits.
A&M was a product of its schedule, like I said.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:04 am to tBrand
You lost to one of the worst teams in your schedule
That kept you out of playoff contention
We beat that same team badly from start to finish
That kept you out of playoff contention
We beat that same team badly from start to finish
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:27 am to Old Sarge
quote:It's Tech!
You goobers spent 40 million on players per year in back to back years and you’re complaining about another team paying for players??
quote:Dominated by Ohio State? It was 14-7. Texas rushed for twice as many yards and had more first downs.
You had 3 losses, got dominated by Ohio State and lost to 4-8 Florida
And you were 3 plays away from a 6-6 record
At some point strength of schedule can’t help you get to somewhere you clearly don’t belong
I don't think Texas deserved to be in the playoffs last year, Sarge. But then and now, strength of schedule should matter. I don't care about Tech's schedule. They'll get exposed again in the playoff. But, just sayin
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:42 am to Capn_Bevo
quote:
14-7.
Only after your garbage time score
They had a 2 TD lead they sat on comfortably
Posted on 5/22/26 at 11:12 am to koreandawg
Crazy to think that just a few years ago that’s the exact conference he was talking about how strong it was.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 11:20 am to koreandawg
Not the best quote but Techs schedule is a joke, we both play OSU, they play Oregon State and we play current natty champ Ohio State.
We wouldnt go undefeated playings 2s and 3s but with the current Big 12 Texas would wax with current roster, just like they did int he early 2000s (minutes OU but OU is not there anymore). Thats Sarks point. Tech plays no one in OOC just like last year and the big 12 swapped Texas and OU for BYU and UCF?
All yall talking about Texas the last decade is irrelevant to todays roster and landscape, which is what Sark is talking about. Texas had a shite 6 -10 year stretch no doubt but if we are talking about today or even the past 3-4 years Texas runs the Big 12 (just liek they did the last season in the Big 12.
We wouldnt go undefeated playings 2s and 3s but with the current Big 12 Texas would wax with current roster, just like they did int he early 2000s (minutes OU but OU is not there anymore). Thats Sarks point. Tech plays no one in OOC just like last year and the big 12 swapped Texas and OU for BYU and UCF?
All yall talking about Texas the last decade is irrelevant to todays roster and landscape, which is what Sark is talking about. Texas had a shite 6 -10 year stretch no doubt but if we are talking about today or even the past 3-4 years Texas runs the Big 12 (just liek they did the last season in the Big 12.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 11:23 am to Pimphand
I think he is all in for this year. If he doesn't take it to house and bring home the trophy, I believe he walks to the NFL.
I think the powers at Texas talked him out of it and he was promised the NIL support from the donors.
He didn't do himself any favors when he shite on the Alma maters of his QB1's uncles and grandfather.....that was truly stepping on his dick.
Time will tell.
I think the powers at Texas talked him out of it and he was promised the NIL support from the donors.
He didn't do himself any favors when he shite on the Alma maters of his QB1's uncles and grandfather.....that was truly stepping on his dick.
Time will tell.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 11:23 am to Hugh McElroy
quote:
exact conference
was it?
quote:
he was talking about how strong it was
was he?
Posted on 5/22/26 at 11:28 am to bamaoldtimer
quote:
That a lot of pressure for an alcoholic to deal with. I think Sark has the best Coaching job in America. There are no excuses for not winning.
I agree, he is feeling the heat and he’s only human. I pray he’s not back on the sauce.
he will be soon if he doesnt get it together. sounds like a broken man
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News