bamaoldtimer
| Favorite team: | Alabama  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | Native Alabamian, Life Long Bama Fan |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 1559 |
| Registered on: | 12/10/2009 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Do Mormons actually believe in God?
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/30/25 at 2:35 pm to Dr RC
Take to the religion board
1
re: It will be Saban to LSU
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/30/25 at 2:30 pm to partsman103
quote:
could see that happening.....nevermind he has a Statue out front of Bryant-Denny Stadium listing all of his National Championships, or that the playing field inside BDS is named "Nick Saban Field @ Bryant Denny Stadium", or that he has an office inside BDS.
Yeah so, why not.
So! Who says he can’t have two fields and numerous statues? Sure he could care less about his office in T town.
Bama gonna tear down his statue and rip Saban off signage. Probably so but Sabans a mercenary.
One thing that would keep him from doing this is his business relationship with Mercedes Benz. Mercedes has huge factory in T town area. Saban is largest Mercedes Dealer in the South. Mercedes might worry bad for business. Saban would say :doublebird:
No, Saban won’t go to LSwho. He has a great life imho.
What could he prove there? That if Ed Orgeron can go win a Natty, then what? He’s got 7.
If LSU is smart, they’ll give ED O a two year contract for 4 million a year. He’d jump on it in a second. I think he’s a damn fine coach. They were stupid to fire him. He’s LSU thru and thru
re: It will be Saban to LSU
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/30/25 at 2:05 pm to BamaScoop
Ok, why do you think this?
Reasons for Saban going.
1. Money. Don’t think so. I bet with all his endorsements etc he’s making as much as what LSU would pay. So no, not a reason
2. Misses Coaching? Maybe. He’s looks in real good shape both physically and mentally. So yes, could be the most important factor.
3. Is familiar with all the boosters and politicians in Louisiana so him having total control would be a must for him. I see this.
4. I see him having to recruit less and rely on booster money to buy players and he can be more NFLish which I think he’d like.
5. A 5 year contract of 15 million per year puts him 78. Still pretty young for Saban.
So yea, I can see it but it’s got to be number 2 for him to do it.
Reasons for Saban going.
1. Money. Don’t think so. I bet with all his endorsements etc he’s making as much as what LSU would pay. So no, not a reason
2. Misses Coaching? Maybe. He’s looks in real good shape both physically and mentally. So yes, could be the most important factor.
3. Is familiar with all the boosters and politicians in Louisiana so him having total control would be a must for him. I see this.
4. I see him having to recruit less and rely on booster money to buy players and he can be more NFLish which I think he’d like.
5. A 5 year contract of 15 million per year puts him 78. Still pretty young for Saban.
So yea, I can see it but it’s got to be number 2 for him to do it.
re: So LSU is poor after all and Louisiana taxpayers are paying the buyout
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/29/25 at 7:11 pm to grich31
quote:
no state funds being used
That’s what got be wondering how can the taxpayers be on the hook and bail out a bunch of multi millionaires. Seems crooked
re: Landry just fumbled the coaching search for LSU
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/29/25 at 7:05 pm to Landmass
I’m ignorant of the hiring and contractual arrangements of big time coaches. So, by the Governor saying the state is buying out the contract, then the original contract must been approved by the state?
I thought boosters ponied up money for coaches salaries etc.
Can someone please explain to me and those who are ignorant of how coach contracts are structured explain if you can.
I thought boosters ponied up money for coaches salaries etc.
Can someone please explain to me and those who are ignorant of how coach contracts are structured explain if you can.
re: "the B1G is better than the SEC"
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/28/25 at 11:00 pm to HTX_LSU
It’s the geography that separates the SEC from most other conferences. This month, games will be played in 55-75 degree weather while Big10, except for old PAC12 teams, will be playing in very cold weather.
As far as quality of play, big10 has been clear winner if only natty winner is the object. I expect that will end this year.
I hope the SEC and Big10 will schedule more Home and Home games. It’s great for the sport. I believe Bama has ND and Ohio State scheduled later this decade.
I’d love to have Bama in the horseshoe in October.
As far as quality of play, big10 has been clear winner if only natty winner is the object. I expect that will end this year.
I hope the SEC and Big10 will schedule more Home and Home games. It’s great for the sport. I believe Bama has ND and Ohio State scheduled later this decade.
I’d love to have Bama in the horseshoe in October.
re: Most watched games last week
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/28/25 at 6:01 pm to themetalreb
At the time, CBS did not have the money to compete with Mickey Mouse.
CBS on its own is small potatoes compared to ESPN/ ABC
CBS I’m sure will try and pickup something from the SEC in the next rounds by paying ESPN for the rights to telecast a few key games or maybe not.
Money talks and BS walks
CBS on its own is small potatoes compared to ESPN/ ABC
CBS I’m sure will try and pickup something from the SEC in the next rounds by paying ESPN for the rights to telecast a few key games or maybe not.
Money talks and BS walks
re: Saban to LSU confirmed
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/26/25 at 11:46 pm to semjase
quote:
Saban for a couple of years to get it stabilized, then takes over as Athletic Director OR Saban IN now as AD and let him hire the new HC. (My preference and many of my LSU Alum and Non-Alum friends)
Getting ready for bed and say this post. Saban would leave ESPN, all his lucrative contracts on tv, to become your teams AD! :rotflmao:
re: Source say LSU is going after someone from Saban’s coaching tree
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/26/25 at 8:37 pm to Anand0925
I’m serious with this pick. Don’t laugh.
Mike Locksley
Mike Locksley
re: LSU fans, be honest….
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/26/25 at 8:33 pm to LSURulzSEC
quote:
None...honestly...I want Lane...
You really don’t
re: What should the top 5 look like now?
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/26/25 at 12:20 pm to Darindawg
1. A&M.
2. Bama
3. Georgia
4. Vandy
5. Ole Miss
Does anybody who knows football think either Ohio State or Indiana on a neutral field could beat any of the above.
I don’t.
2. Bama
3. Georgia
4. Vandy
5. Ole Miss
Does anybody who knows football think either Ohio State or Indiana on a neutral field could beat any of the above.
I don’t.
re: Texas/ OU Illusions?
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/23/25 at 6:35 pm to Dirty 6th
quote:
I’m really glad Texas is in the SEC
It’s great having two teams like OU and Texas bringing the passion and competitiveness to the conference.
I have no doubt both teams will find their footing and become top tier SEC football programs.
I just think Lane at Texas or OU would be world class. That marriage truly scares me. Glad it won’t happen
re: Texas/ OU Illusions?
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/23/25 at 12:55 pm to MtVernon
quote:
On paper, we won the SEC last year
No, you won 2nd place. Under old SEC East/West divisions, you would have won the West. Unfortunately we don’t give out rings for division winner. Last year, yes you may have technically won the regular season but not the conference Title.
re: Texas/ OU Illusions?
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/23/25 at 12:29 pm to Gunga Din
quote:
But with a 12+ team playoff... that has changed things. SEC championships aren't going to be required to get there
Respectfully, if you truly want to become part of the SEC family, winning the SEC Title is wayyyyy more prestigious than playing in the playoffs. Winning the SEC guarantees a spot in the playoff regardless of record.
Winning the SEC means you’re one of us and the best of us. cheers:
re: Texas/ OU Illusions?
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/23/25 at 12:24 pm to Faurot fodder
quote:
My prediction: Many of these "blue bloods" are going to get blue balls, since they won't be claiming as many titles in today's landscape
Texas needs a true HC. Sark was awesome under Saban as an OC. He just doesn’t have it as a HC. Maybe giving up the OC duties would help and benching Manning .
OU has a good DC coordinator in Venerables but he’s lacking on the Offensive side. I think Jon Gruden would be awesome for OU.
re: Texas/ OU Illusions?
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/23/25 at 12:18 pm to MtVernon
quote:
Texas went to the SEC championship game in our 1st year as a member. Which part of that is an illusion.
FIRST Year.
True, very good accomplishment. That was last year. The illusion was back before season ranked No. 1 and being where you are today. You must admit that horn fans must be very disillusioned about this season so far.
Texas/ OU Illusions?
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/23/25 at 10:04 am
Firstly, I’m glad we have Texas and OU in the conference. Two Blue Bloods with huge passionate fanbases who were wasting away in the Big 12.
Texas illusion? They would waltz into the conference and smash the competition.
OU illusion? That Venerables is the right Coach.
Conclusion: Both will have new Coaches within 3 years or less and rebuilding will start. Many years for both before they win an SEC Title.
Texas illusion? They would waltz into the conference and smash the competition.
OU illusion? That Venerables is the right Coach.
Conclusion: Both will have new Coaches within 3 years or less and rebuilding will start. Many years for both before they win an SEC Title.
Which proposal do you like
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/17/25 at 7:21 pm
As of October 2025, there is not one bipartisan college sports bill, but rather several competing bills and proposals in Congress and from the executive branch. The most prominent bipartisan bill introduced in the House is the College SPORTS Act, but the Student Compensation and Opportunity through Rights and Endorsements (SCORE) Act also received bipartisan sponsorship.
College SPORTS Act
The College Student-athlete Protections and Opportunities through Rights, Transparency, and Safety (College SPORTS) Act was introduced in June 2025 by Representative Lisa McClain (R-Mich.) and Representative Janelle Bynum (D-Ore.). Key provisions include:
National NIL standard: Creates a single federal standard for Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rules, replacing the current patchwork of state laws.
Prohibition on employee status: Explicitly prevents student-athletes from being classified as employees of their university, conference, or the NCAA.
Enhanced athlete protections: Requires schools to cover sports-related medical costs for four years after an athlete leaves the institution, and guarantees scholarship stability.
Agent oversight: Establishes standards and registration requirements for agents to protect athletes from exploitation.
Education and transparency: Mandates training on mental health, nutrition, financial literacy, and NIL education for athletes.
SCORE Act
Another bill, the Student Compensation and Opportunity through Rights and Endorsements (SCORE) Act (H.R. 4312), was introduced in July 2025 by a bipartisan group of House representatives. It was approved by a House subcommittee but is currently stalled. Its provisions include:
Limited antitrust exemption: Grants the NCAA and conferences a limited shield from antitrust lawsuits concerning eligibility rules.
Federal NIL preemption: Overrides varying state NIL laws with a single national framework.
Non-employee status: Explicitly bars athletes from being classified as employees.
SAFE Act
In contrast to the bipartisan efforts in the House, Senate Democrats introduced the Student Athlete Fairness and Enforcement (SAFE) Act in September 2025. This bill contrasts significantly with the House-based proposals by:
Allowing conferences to pool media rights: Amends the Sports Broadcasting Act to allow for collective media deals.
Omitting antitrust protection: Does not provide an antitrust exemption for the NCAA or conferences.
Protecting non-revenue sports: Requires schools to maintain scholarship and roster spots for Olympic sports at 2023–24 levels.
Avoiding employee classification: Does not explicitly prohibit athletes from being classified as employees, leaving the issue open to legal developments.
Current landscape
The varying approaches in these bills reflect different priorities among stakeholders and have created an uncertain legislative environment. With the ongoing legal challenges, including the Johnson v. NCAA case regarding athlete employment status, it remains unclear if a single comprehensive bill will gain enough support to pass both chambers of Congress.
College SPORTS Act
The College Student-athlete Protections and Opportunities through Rights, Transparency, and Safety (College SPORTS) Act was introduced in June 2025 by Representative Lisa McClain (R-Mich.) and Representative Janelle Bynum (D-Ore.). Key provisions include:
National NIL standard: Creates a single federal standard for Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rules, replacing the current patchwork of state laws.
Prohibition on employee status: Explicitly prevents student-athletes from being classified as employees of their university, conference, or the NCAA.
Enhanced athlete protections: Requires schools to cover sports-related medical costs for four years after an athlete leaves the institution, and guarantees scholarship stability.
Agent oversight: Establishes standards and registration requirements for agents to protect athletes from exploitation.
Education and transparency: Mandates training on mental health, nutrition, financial literacy, and NIL education for athletes.
SCORE Act
Another bill, the Student Compensation and Opportunity through Rights and Endorsements (SCORE) Act (H.R. 4312), was introduced in July 2025 by a bipartisan group of House representatives. It was approved by a House subcommittee but is currently stalled. Its provisions include:
Limited antitrust exemption: Grants the NCAA and conferences a limited shield from antitrust lawsuits concerning eligibility rules.
Federal NIL preemption: Overrides varying state NIL laws with a single national framework.
Non-employee status: Explicitly bars athletes from being classified as employees.
SAFE Act
In contrast to the bipartisan efforts in the House, Senate Democrats introduced the Student Athlete Fairness and Enforcement (SAFE) Act in September 2025. This bill contrasts significantly with the House-based proposals by:
Allowing conferences to pool media rights: Amends the Sports Broadcasting Act to allow for collective media deals.
Omitting antitrust protection: Does not provide an antitrust exemption for the NCAA or conferences.
Protecting non-revenue sports: Requires schools to maintain scholarship and roster spots for Olympic sports at 2023–24 levels.
Avoiding employee classification: Does not explicitly prohibit athletes from being classified as employees, leaving the issue open to legal developments.
Current landscape
The varying approaches in these bills reflect different priorities among stakeholders and have created an uncertain legislative environment. With the ongoing legal challenges, including the Johnson v. NCAA case regarding athlete employment status, it remains unclear if a single comprehensive bill will gain enough support to pass both chambers of Congress.
re: Miami undefeated. Ranked #2. Stadium half filled on a Friday night.
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/17/25 at 7:11 pm to theballguy
All I know is at the Sugarbowl in 92, I saw many Miami fans and they were great annd they were everywhere. Obviously back then they had a national tshirt fan base. It has shrunk since then but the true core Miami fans are rabid.
re: The reality of Lane to Florida
Posted by bamaoldtimer on 10/16/25 at 7:49 pm to Saskwatch
:cheers: I wish OM nation gets that opportunity.
Popular
23
