Started By
Message

re: Sark is staying inbounds with respect to Cole Huston

Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:12 pm to
Posted by stuckintexas
Austin & DFW
Member since Sep 2009
3461 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

just ask aggy!

Posted by kajunman
Member since Dec 2015
9118 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:13 pm to
No coach in college football has more morals than Lane Kiffin. He fought for the players all the while following every rule. Props to Lane for being the beacon of light in the crap pile that is college ball.
Posted by Old School Tex
North Carolina
Member since Jul 2021
2094 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

When you receive the draconian punishments just understand that we LSU are benevolent and tried to spare you of these punishments by abstaining from voting.


Everyone loves Sark. I’ve learned from this Board that Kiffin is the renegade…
Posted by Old School Tex
North Carolina
Member since Jul 2021
2094 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

morality? 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 read the book UTrans


On the 7th day, God made Bevo, the perfect mascot.

It’s my personal belief the the Creator of that noble creature is definitely on Texas’ side…

Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
13464 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:28 pm to
Correction: that is a Longhorn steer.

Bevo was created by a 13 - 0 branding iron
This post was edited on 9/7/26 at 3:29 pm
Posted by Old School Tex
North Carolina
Member since Jul 2021
2094 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Correction: that is a Longhorn steer. Bevo was created by a 13 - 0 branding iron


Was that the last time that aggy beat us?? Back in 1892??



Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
13464 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:34 pm to
No, not the last time… but it’s fine. Y’all can gloat after last years game.

Kudos for not throwing out some lame BEVO denial…
Posted by Clockwatcher68
Youngsville
Member since May 2006
8409 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

just ask aggy!




Not sure why Huston is ineligible. I thought he hadn’t crossed the arbitrary line? There has to be a line, and the conference drew it where they drew it. It was easy to draw it to isolate a single school instead of trying to get 7 or 8 schools to reverse course. Sucks for us, but I get it. It’s definitely necessary or eventually 6 year veterans of the NFL will get cut, enroll at a school and get an injunction to play.
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
13464 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:41 pm to
Have an upvote
Posted by Old School Tex
North Carolina
Member since Jul 2021
2094 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

No, not the last time… but it’s fine. Y’all can gloat after last years game. Kudos for not throwing out some lame BEVO denial…


Yeah, I have heard the Bevo story that you relayed all my life.

I just checked Google’s AI on my iPhone though, which says that much of that old tale is not true. But the AI explanation is pretty entertaining also:

“No, the story that UT students altered an Aggie "13-0" brand to spell "Bevo" is false, though the physical branding itself actually happened.

According to the Texas Exes, “For years, Aggies have proudly touted the stunt as the reason the steer acquired his name. But was the brand really changed? And is that why he's called Bevo?”.

Historical records show that the legend is inaccurate for a couple of key reasons:

1. The name came first: The steer was already referred to as "Bevo" in print by the University of Texas campus magazine editor Ben Dyer two and a half months before Texas A&M students broke in and branded "13-0" on the animal in early 1917.

2. The brand was never altered: While the Aggies did successfully brand "13-0" onto the longhorn's hide, UT students never actually modified the mark to try and spell "Bevo" as the folklore claims.

The real fate of Bevo I: Because the steer was unmanageable and upkeep costs were high during World War I, the original Bevo was not retired to a pasture; instead, he was fattened up and served as the main course at the January 1920 football banquet, where UT invited Aggie guests to share the meal and returned the branded hide as a gesture of fair play.

Posted by ForeverEllisHugh
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
16723 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 4:03 pm to
…so is LSU; neither team rostered the players.

It’s just that Kiffin is doing it with an attitude.
Posted by everytrueson
Southern California
Member since Mar 2012
8027 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Here is an analogy for the SEC rule concerning the pro players Several players have tonsillitis, and the SEC says you can have your tonsils removed. 25 of those players have tonsil removal done by a regular surgeon, while 2 of them have a throat specialist remove their tonsils. The SEC then (after the precedures are done, and all players released by their doctor) creates a rule that the 2 players who had a specialist do the precedure are ineligible, whole the other 25 are eligible. Then, hundreds of idiots get on the RANT to rip those 2 players as ineligible and their coach as immoral. We have to read page after page from keyboard docters using AI to argue how getting tonsils removed by a specialist somehow gives them unfair competitive edge. Those same keyboard warriors with KDS attempt to explain how those 2 players are preventing freshman student opportunities but somehow those 25 other pro players are not,


Did you seriously type all this to simply avoid the sentence: signed a contract…

I give you a 10/10 for the mental gymnastics though.
Posted by DustInTheWind
Member since Sep 2016
1437 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 4:24 pm to
So let me get this straight

All of that shite talking, and Sark is actually the only guy who had one of these guys rostered in all of this mess. And now he’s giving up on it.

So basically he did the same thing that Lane did except he actually had the guy on the roster. A Dallas judge even granted the injunction so he could play. A court event that Sankey never even showed up to. Unlike the one in Louisiana.

And that’s ok I guess. Nothing to see here.

It’s going to be a fun year
This post was edited on 9/7/26 at 5:50 pm
Posted by Whentheleveebreaks
Member since Aug 2020
2998 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 4:31 pm to
NPD at its finest right here for everyone on display!
Posted by redandright
Member since Jun 2011
9828 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

I’ve been here since 2005, you noob


Longer than Texas has been in the SEC.
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
87247 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

Kiffin's win at all costs mentally will ultimately hurt LSU in the end imho


Mizzou/Texas rostered ineligible players. Mizzou played theirs’

LSU didn’t even roster them

Can you see the hypocrisy?
This post was edited on 9/7/26 at 5:04 pm
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
39078 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

So basically he did the same thing that Lane did except he actually had the guy on the roster. A Dallas judge even granted the injunction so he could play. A court event that Sankey never even showed up to. Unlike the one Louisiana.



Sark is temu kiffin.



Once kiffin implements something and leaves sark can kinda get close to filling his shoes. Maybe like 75% of the way.


Theres a reason both pete Carroll and Saban went with kiffin first


This post was edited on 9/7/26 at 5:08 pm
Posted by MackDaddyBrown
Member since Jul 2021
4129 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

Not sure why Huston is ineligible.

Sark said for a reason not related to the injunction he currently has.

We wrote the rules for the SEC so don't expect him to be ruled ineligible there either. My sources tell me it's just a matter of time till he's cleared.
Posted by Clockwatcher68
Youngsville
Member since May 2006
8409 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

We wrote the rules for the SEC so don't expect him to be ruled ineligible there either.


if true, a different team would have been in the crosshairs last week.
Posted by Old1937
Member since Jun 2024
1420 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 6:15 pm to
If the players in question took money as pay as a Pro, then they are not entitled to play is my opinion
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter