Started By
Message
4
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:19 pm to ReauxlTide222
It was far from major, but it was a foul. We jump into three points shooters far more than we should.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:20 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
effect the shot.
*affect the shot.
To "effect the shot" means to bring about or create the shot.
Dumbass
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:21 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:I would be too.
we have so many bitching about the missed call
Zero judgement in that call.
The kid dribbled off his foot and then picked it up and kept dribbling.
There is ZERO excuse to not call that. It has, HAS to be called.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:21 pm to ReauxlTide222
Major contact. Lulz
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:22 pm to Irons Puppet
63-62
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:23 pm to dehsloot
quote:It was major contact when we're talking about making contact with a 3 point shooter going straight up on a shot.
Major contact. Lulz
frick are you talking about? "Major contact" isn't hitting him with a goddamn hammer.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:23 pm to ReauxlTide222
I was screaming when I saw it. I don't know how the ref missed it right in front of him. Again, we had every opportunity to win it and just had a really bad shooting day. We had some good open looks and just couldn't make them. If Doughty and Harper hit their missed FT we win the game. Our guys couldn't close the deal and the kids from UVa could.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:23 pm to MillerLiteTime
quote:
That was a very unusual play.
That's what the talking heads said but a double dribble off of the kids foot is not unusual to be called a double dribble.
Its unusual for it not be called.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:23 pm to dehsloot
quote:
A still shot only shows an AU player standing there with his hands up. He’s allowed to do that.
Go back and look at the tape, when that frame was captured Auburn's feet were still in the air moving farther into him. It was a clear foul right in front of the ref.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:24 pm to dehsloot
quote:Jesus Christ.
A still shot only shows an AU player standing there with his hands up. He’s allowed to do that.
The video is WAY worse than that still shot.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:25 pm to dehsloot
quote:
A still shot only shows an AU player standing there with his hands up.
He fouled without a doubt. It was idiotic actually. There is an argument to be made that they didn’t call that all game long (saw it earlier in the game on both teams) and missed a pretty easy double dribble call.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:27 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
Watch all the talk on Monday.
Hate to burst your bubble, but here will be the Monday talking points:
-Virginia's chance at the ultimate redemption (this will be the biggest one)
-Izzo's legacy if MSU wins this game
-Where will Chris Beard be next year if TT wins this game
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:33 pm to EXPLAYER
quote:What till you find out he was born in Tuscaloosa.
Refs shouldn't determine the NC
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:36 pm to Irons Puppet
The refs didn’t. The Auburn player that committed the foul did.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:46 pm to dehsloot
quote:
If it occurred after he released it then how did it cause him to adjust before he shot?
Jeez.....If you were in the air about to shoot a ball and someone was about to cut your legs out from under you, would it cause you to flinch or adjust your shot? That is why they have the rule that the defender can't slide under where the shooters legs would land. Otherwise no one would take jumpshots because you could cut their legs out just after the shot and it not be a penalty.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:46 pm to Irons Puppet
Melt, bitch.
frick Auburn.
frick Auburn.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News