Obtuse1

quote:

---

Does anyone know the specific basis these groups are arguing that the report should be released to the public?
It is an investigative summary, right? Those generally are not released to the public unless entered in to a court record.

---

I skimmed the briefs a while ago and two arguments stood out proud to me:

1. One is that historical precedent not releasing a final special counsel report is not an outlier but an actual anomaly over several decades of Department of Justice practice, even when the prosecution was closed or dropped.

2. The more directly compelling argument, with plenty of case law support, is that Volume 2 was indeed submitted to the court in support of a substantive motion and thus is a judicial record. This should be a simple binary fact pattern. If it was submitted, then it is a judicial record and should be released.

There were other arguments, such as 1A, general transparency, and congressional oversight. I found them less individually compelling.

Dude just can't stop. The absolute state of the ratio...




I have had X blow up in my face and occasionally got my dick stuck in a Chinese finger trap, but got dam son out in the real world that is call your malpractice carrier kinda incompetence. A lot of times things like this blow over within an hour or never even make a splash but the fact that sportsball was involved got the sports geeks involved and the video of Smith actually at the game splattered all over X almost immediately.

This is silly.

quote:

---

Enough with the petty wars.

---

The opposite would happen. You think 192 countries are just going to give up their sovereignty 5 (6) of them having nuclear weapons? Control would be essentially impossible.

quote:

---

The US rules from Hawaii in the West to Iceland in the East.

---

LOL, you just started WWIII right there. Iceland is geographically half American and half European and mainly Euro in culture. You think Russia and China would just give up control of the northern passages?

Eat another gummy; your takes can't get worse.

quote:

---

If in Louisiana, you could possibly have a case for Detrimental Reliance.

---

This is the same thing as promissory estoppel that someone else mentioned, depending on what MS calls it.

The following is not legal advice just a generic legal view of the situation and the OP should contact one or more MS attorneys that handle employment law.

The employment-at-will throws a big monkey wrench into any potential cause of action, but there very well be state specific laws that get around that potential bar.

In general for promissory estoppel in a situation like this you have to show 4 things:

1. An unequivocal offer for the new position, preferably in writing

2. It must be reasonable the employer would expect the offeree to rely on the offer

3. The offeree must actually rely

4. The offeree must have actual damages and may have to meet some state threshold. If for example the person is able to sale the house and after all expenses are accounted for they make a profit, they may not have actual damages, although their are ways to argue this. The person also has the obligation to mitigate their damages so they can't just keep paying for the home without putting it on the market and trying to sale it ASAP which still getting FMV.



There is a potential COA here but the OP needs to talk to a MS employment law attorney to see what their options and obligations are as soon as possible.

Is this regarding a botched breast augmentation surgery?

Paid for cannons, got droopy pea shooters, maybe?

If you just learned about figure 8 racing, I question whether you are actually American to begin with.

Take your pick of Luckhoo, Spence, or Darrow.

F. Lee Bailey arguably had the best X of any lawyer in any discipline.



ETA I should have noted Lionel Luckhoo was Guyanese, but the OP didn't say American and Luckhoo's achievements are legendary.

Outside of prosecutorial misconduct, like in the first trial, if she had continued to be represented by an attorney, she would have continued to get, at worst, hung juries.

quote:

---

There’s nothing better then a Friday night

---

Hopefully we all live long enough and make enough wise choices that Monday morning, Wednesday at 2pm and Friday at 6pm all feel the exact same way.

quote:

---

Ban for spreading hoaxes

C'mon, for fricks sake.

---

While I do love a good troll it is unlikely he would do that since it becomes a public challenge just begging to be met. It is unlikely he would be arrogant enough to play around with a $100+ billion dollar asset. This is part of the reason why you rarely hear about ransomware attacks unless they are bound to disclose a data breach.