
Obtuse1
Favorite team: | Wofford |
Location: | Westside Bodymore Yo |
Biography: | |
Interests: | |
Occupation: | |
Number of Posts: | 28359 |
Registered on: | 9/25/2016 |
Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Gen Z will end up more successful than millennials
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/5/25 at 4:11 pm
quote:
depends on the focus, a BA in physics is not going to be as in depth but more broad and general in education, BS is opposite. The others are the same.
not all liberal arts degrees are good and not all are bad, same with bachelors of science, some good, some worthless
There seems to be some confusion; not all "liberal arts degrees" are BAs, you can get a BS in a liberal arts program. I have a BS in chemistry and a BA in English Lit. Had I just gotten one or the other I would have had the same broad-ranging education.
A liberal arts education is simply a broad education that, besides focusing on your major, you are also required to take a wide range of subjects designed to make you a well-rounded person. So if you get a BS in physics from a liberal arts institution, you are also going to take things like economics, politics, history, sociology, foreign language, fine arts, etc.
The idea of a worthless degree is also interesting. Many here define degree as worthless if it does not naturally lead to a high paying career. This is a fair way to look at it but it also discounts the value of education for education's sake. I grew up in a family that considered education to be as valuable as earning potential. There are certainly schools where the education is near worthless viewed through either lens. Students should also be well informed about the typical career compensation that some degrees limit one to.
quote:
most people are not smart enough to know the difference....which might include you btw.
You are conflating smart and educated which are two different things. I have two degrees from a liberal arts institution, I taught as an adjunct professor for 8 years at the same one, and sit on the board now. I have a reasonable understanding of what a liberal arts education is.
re: this is ridiculous
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/5/25 at 12:29 pm
quote:
holy crap I'm obtuse
:cheeky:
re: Gen Z will end up more successful than millennials
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/5/25 at 12:16 pm
quote:
Zero government loans or funding should go to liberal arts degrees.
I would bet a million dollars that at the time you typed this, you could not accurately define a liberal arts degree.
FYI, biology, chemistry, math, and physics are all liberal arts.
re: Junk I bought at garage sales this weekend -5/1-5/3. - Haunted item video on page 3
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/5/25 at 1:45 am
quote:
I have to start over. I blew all my earnings on a family trip to Vegas last new years.
I gotta say when you mentioned that in the other thread, it made me irrationally angry. Apparently, I was mildly invested.
re: Where does the OT stand on dandelions?
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/5/25 at 1:32 am
quote:
Stfu clown! Im 1000 percent correct and you’re an idiot!
Damn Big Weed cultist.
I am mixing up a 2,4-D, mecoprop, and dicamba cocktail right now. Your dandelions are going to be dandedead.
re: Conclave trivia
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/4/25 at 10:22 pm
quote:
Damn. 84 in 1191 and 1294
I am honestly dubious of those ages.
re: TGIF Watch thread
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/4/25 at 10:17 pm
Those 1970's era dive watches are always interesting. I actually got a Majestime (same case, different dial) in a sack o' watches I used for practice movements. I don't remember the name but it was a French movement. Decent workhorse type manual wind. The thing I liked about it was the case back engraving, it reminded me of a Vostok scuba dude. The only other thing I remember was it was fairly small, maybe 36mm.
re: Dear Facebook - good chance I am resigning my job tomorrow
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/4/25 at 9:49 pm
I opened TD to see this at the top of the page, odd as my wife and I had just finished a discussion about me setting a date certain to retire.
It is soon time for me to transition to my Walmart greeter phase of life.
It is soon time for me to transition to my Walmart greeter phase of life.
re: President Trump orders the reopening of Alcatraz Island Prison
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/4/25 at 8:15 pm
quote:
I don’t see any point in doing this. We have ADX Florence for those kind of prisoners. Seems like a waste of money and other resources.
Anyone who has ever visited Alcatraz would know you need to level it and start over in order to have a functioning modern prison that is safe for the corrections workers. It would be much cheaper to build another ADX either in Florence or somewhere else. We don't need water to prevent escapes from that level of prison, and no need to destroy a landmark and tourist attraction.
re: Car board: 958 Cayennes
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/4/25 at 5:54 pm
quote:
Porsche answerd a question nobody asked still made bank.
I wouldn't say that.
Porsches have been winning offroad rallies for decades. You had Tuthill building some amazing road versions for customers. Then you had Matt Farrah do his Safari build and they entered the car zeitgeist. After that cane the Singer/Tuthill collabs. Finally, the 911 Dakar which, if anything, was late to the party but already had a built-in audience.
If I had had the fun money and the juice, I would definitely have grabbed one, not for the flip but to enjoy.
To the OP:
Transfer case is the biggest issue
As mentioned don't buy one that you can't verify maintenance was done on time. I call it second owner-itis. The first owner buys an expensive German car, keeps it for 4-5 years, and keeps up with the maintenance, partly because it is cheap during those years. A second owner comes along and stretches to buy his dream car, then when the expensive maintenance comes around, he puts it off because of something else going on in his life. Then the down hill run starts and maintenance turns into expensive repairs, and he unloads it. The biggest nightmares are the Porsche/Merc/BMW/Audi you got a deal on.
re: What are the best and worst things about crawfishs boils?
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/4/25 at 5:24 pm
quote:
is when the next garbage collection day is next Wednesday.
That is one of the hidden benefits of having a camp, almost all the smelly stuff goes straight in the water. The gulls, grackles, and crows appreciate it too.
re: Where does the OT stand on dandelions?
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/3/25 at 10:49 pm
quote:
Medicinal value
Another one brainwashed by Big Weed.
re: Older baws in flashy cars
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/3/25 at 10:46 pm
quote:
That said, sportiness and flashiness looks tacky on you bro. It doesn't mesh.
The first thing I thought of was Sir Jackie Stewart sliding out of something like a McLaren P1 LM. That would mesh like two Swiss watch gears.
Fat Sloppy just butthurt he can't fit into anything sporty without getting lubed up with Crisco and press fit in.
re: Zelensky rejects ceasefire and say he can’t guarantee the safety of world leaders
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/3/25 at 7:59 pm
quote:
I think that you are missing his vested interest in lining his own pockets by perpetuating this conflict.
How many Bugattis has Olena bought now?
re: 30A and Public Beach Access
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/3/25 at 5:27 pm
quote:
I've got to admit, if DeSantis doesn't sign the new bill that just passed Florida's house, I honestly see tourism in Florida dying off quickly for the beach communities.
There is plenty of wet sand for the poors to enjoy.
re: Garrett Wards manslaughter conviction has been vacated.
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/3/25 at 3:58 pm
quote:
If a witness testifies he heard Ward call the victim a racial epithet, while he was beating his victim to death- why shouldn't the jury hear that?
Why shouldn't the DA ask the witness if he heard Ward say anything?
Again, it goes back to the prejudicial vs probative issue.
Does testimony about someone accused of committing a battery that suggests they used a racial epithet make the battery more or less likely to have occurred? I suggest it does not but it does potentially go to state of mind which may have a bearing. It is also a very different thing to try to turn the testimony into a racially charged rant.
re: Garrett Wards manslaughter conviction has been vacated.
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/3/25 at 3:48 pm
quote:
I assume it was ruled inadmissible pretrial. Seems pretty probative to me if it was right before, during, or immediately after. Maybe it wasn't.
I haven't seen any evidence of a motion in limine regarding this subject. I would imagine had it been ruled inadmissible in pretrial motions the trial judge would have taken a different approach had the prosecutor defined a pre-trial motion. The trial judge viewed it as harmless error.
re: Garrett Wards manslaughter conviction has been vacated.
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/3/25 at 3:45 pm
quote:
Is there a bright line where it went from permissible to prejudicial?
First, I do not practice in LA nor do I practice criminal law.
AFAIK there is no bright line test for this since again AFAIK no case has dealet with this exact type of testimony pattern. There is however, a large body of caselaw dealing with racially charged testimony and how the court sees the potential prejudice from it. I think it is a bit overzealous but it is all rooted in Blackstone's Ratio.
re: Garrett Wards manslaughter conviction has been vacated.
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/3/25 at 3:33 pm
quote:
Why would it matter what words were said? That doesn't make any sense.
In the grand scheme, it is a prejudicial vs probative issue. There is a long list of SCOTUS cases (and I assume LA cases) that deal with such issues. In the specific case I doubt it made a difference, but I also guarantee the prosecutor knew the line they were straddling by bringing it in.
re: Garrett Wards manslaughter conviction has been vacated.
Posted by Obtuse1 on 5/3/25 at 3:05 pm
quote:
Is this not a hearsay exception if it's something someone heard the defendant say?
It isn't a hearsay issue. The witness could testify to what Ward said during the attack the problem comes in when he purportedly used the N word and the witness repeated it.
This potentially causes racial prejudice within the jury. SCOTUS hasn't ruled if something like this is a structural error but the LA court decided that this reached the point of reversible error due to the potential racial bias preventing Ward from having an impartial jury and thus prevented him from having a fair trial.
IMO the trial did not turn on that, but to have any real feel for it one must be in the courtroom and paying close attention to the jury at that moment.
This is clearly a win for Ward, he gets another bite at the apple. If I was forced to bet I would say he will lose again if it is retried but he was definitely not going to win sitting in a cell. Prosecutors tend to go two ways with a retrial they either limp out or they go 100%.
Popular