Started By
Message
re: Ranking the SEC School's Basketball Programs HISTORICALLY
Posted on 12/5/16 at 1:59 pm to Lord Keith of Kerth
Posted on 12/5/16 at 1:59 pm to Lord Keith of Kerth
quote:
My cousin is an AAU coach, and he say that his players almost never consider going to SEC schools.
If they are 5*, Cal will bring them to Kentucky
0
Posted on 12/5/16 at 2:04 pm to Lord Keith of Kerth
We have a Final Four appearance. That and 'Nique (Nique was the reason we made that Final Four) are basically the extent of our basketball history.
This post was edited on 12/5/16 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 12/5/16 at 2:10 pm to crispyUGA
Dominique went 3rd overall in the '82 NBA draft. Verne Fleming is the reason Hugh made it to Albuquerque in '83 with Phi Slamma Jamma, Lousiville & NCSU. 
enjoyed watching Hugh & UGa take down The Nose in the East final
enjoyed watching Hugh & UGa take down The Nose in the East final
This post was edited on 12/5/16 at 2:14 pm
Posted on 12/5/16 at 2:11 pm to 1801
Yeah not really sure why UGA is that far up
Posted on 12/5/16 at 2:28 pm to Lord Keith of Kerth
In conference titles, we're tied for second with LSU in overall titles, and second in conference tournament titles.
Problem is a lack of success in the NCAA tournament. 1 Elite 8 appearance, and only 8 trips to the Sweet 16 with 20 trips to the big dance.
So, it depends on the criteria. If you're looking at recent success... we are way down on the list.
Problem is a lack of success in the NCAA tournament. 1 Elite 8 appearance, and only 8 trips to the Sweet 16 with 20 trips to the big dance.
So, it depends on the criteria. If you're looking at recent success... we are way down on the list.
Posted on 12/5/16 at 2:59 pm to 1801
quote:they're at the bottom in basketball too???
Ole Miss 1259 wins / .498 win%
Posted on 12/5/16 at 3:02 pm to Lord Keith of Kerth
quote:
UK
UF
Arkansas
LSU
Missouri
Bama
UT
Georgia
msu
Vandy
A&M
Vandy
Aubrun
USCe
Ole Miss
Other than Vandy being listed twice, it looks about right to me.
Posted on 12/5/16 at 3:06 pm to BHMKyle
Missouri 1575 wins / .586 win%
We'll be back someday. When...I have no idea. But things are gonna change.
I look forward to having UK look over their shoulder at who's coming. It's gonna happen.
We'll be back someday. When...I have no idea. But things are gonna change.
I look forward to having UK look over their shoulder at who's coming. It's gonna happen.
Posted on 12/5/16 at 3:07 pm to BHMKyle
Georgia ranked too high and Vandy a little low. Other than that, pretty good ranking
Posted on 12/5/16 at 3:13 pm to Govt Tide
UF has been a top flight program for 20-25 years, but talking HISTORICALLY, their basketball program was a wasteland before that. They never even made NCAA tourney until 1987.
Posted on 12/5/16 at 3:15 pm to tkeefer
We didn't give a shite about it when it was a white man's 8 team tournament.
Posted on 12/5/16 at 3:16 pm to Govt Tide
Yeah I dont really know much about vandy basketball other than they made the sweet 16 once so I didn't know where to put them.
Posted on 12/5/16 at 3:20 pm to Mizzou Mule
quote:
I look forward to having UK look over their shoulder at who's coming. It's gonna happen.
It's Mizzou's fate to be sandwiched in between two programs who dominate them in both conferences of which they have been a member. Kansas then Kentucky. That hasn't changed in 80 years and won't change now.
Posted on 12/5/16 at 3:21 pm to Lord Keith of Kerth
Auburn UGA and Ole Miss have got to be the bottom three.
Posted on 12/5/16 at 3:22 pm to TIGERSPIKE
I ranked UGA where they are just because they made the final four once.
Posted on 12/5/16 at 3:36 pm to Mizzou Mule
Agreed. Mizzou will be back soon enough. This conference definitely needs a strong Mizzou to help out with SOS. Just waiting on Kim to get the boot.
Posted on 12/5/16 at 3:38 pm to 1801
quote:
South Carolina 1367 wins / .530 win%
... and much of that, hundreds of those wins, were while competing in the ACC in the 50s, 60s and 70s.
OP is an adolescent, obviously.
Posted on 12/5/16 at 3:55 pm to scrooster
The OP is not an adolescent. I just look at post-season success because I think that's more meaningful.
Posted on 12/5/16 at 4:07 pm to Lord Keith of Kerth
quote:
because I think
"because YOU think" is irrelevant according to your subject line.
Your subject line says, "Ranking the SEC School's Basketball Programs HISTORICALLY."
Historically (meaning all time) South Carolina is, at the very least, in the top eight of the SEC as a men's basketball program.
Yes, post season is important, but (historically) it's also about who gets on runs - who is peaking at the right time - who has suffered the fewest injuries - who has had the lucky breaks.
So, given the subjective nature of your criterion and biased ranking system, the subject line of your thread should read, "IMHO Ranking the SEC Schools' Men's Basketball Programs based upon post season results HISTORICALLY."
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News