Started By
Message

re: PP7 still mad, pals. Oh he still real mad......

Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:55 pm to
Posted by Fishhead
Elmendorf, TX
Member since Jan 2008
12183 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

Corey Webster
#Sabanthug
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95852 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

They intercepted it at mid field, you have no idea what would have happened.
You are right, i dont know. But since 2009, LSU averages 11.8 points per game against BAMA. So im assuming we werent going to mount a drive
This post was edited on 7/24/13 at 2:56 pm
Posted by Lv2spd
Alabama
Member since Feb 2012
43 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

Tom Ritter was officiating that day, so therefore it wasn't an INT.


During the Shula days, I thought Ritter was biased against Bama. Now it seems to me like he may give Bama the benefit of the doubt more than others. Maybe he's just a lousy ref?
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36106 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:56 pm to
No, it was nowhere near this obvious. It was a bad camera angle and you couldn't tell if his feet were in or out. I heard the camera man was a Bama grad.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95852 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Wait, this angle was in the replay?
No idea what was in the booth, but it was on during coverage. Couldnt honestly believe they didnt overturn it
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143616 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:57 pm to
TA, I hope you're stricken with sickle cell
Posted by Billy Mays
Member since Jan 2009
25288 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:01 pm to
Three different Top-6 NFL draftees in that pic... impressive
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83543 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:01 pm to
Ok I just watched the game tape. Knowing what I know now I'd 100% give him the INT after watching the replay. At the time it was definitely in LSU's favor...but it wasnt 100%. I'd say 95% chance he was in from the original video. I'd probably give it to em. I guess replay refs have to be 100% sure though.
This post was edited on 7/24/13 at 3:03 pm
Posted by GCTiger11
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Jan 2012
45153 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:01 pm to
Because the Alabama fans would be perfectly ok with that call had PP been Milliner.
Posted by MetryTyger
Metro NOLA, LA
Member since Jan 2004
15607 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:03 pm to
And it didn't help that the Replay Official in the press box was an Alabama grad...Gee, I wonder what call I should make ????
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Too bad it wasn't an interception.


Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36106 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:03 pm to
To be overturned they have to DEFINITE proof. If it had been called a INT originally it would have stayed a INT.
Posted by tc5140
Member since Jul 2009
782 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:04 pm to
that is bullshite. watch any video of that play and there is absolutely no lack of ball control. It was possessed in bounds tightly in his grasp.

I can't stand these liberal bama fans who can't say we got away with one there. It's always but but but but even when the evidence is overwhelming.

Be a man bastard.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83543 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

And it didn't help that the Replay Official in the press box was an Alabama grad...Gee, I wonder what call I should make ????


Y'all need to stop crying about this and infiltrate the system like Alabama did.
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36106 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:05 pm to
Upset yes, thought it was some ref conspiracy? No.
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

The issue was not whether he was in bounds. The issue is if he was in bounds with complete control of the ball and if there was "indisputable video evidence" of that, since the call on the field was in incomplete pass.


thanks Professor fricking Football
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83543 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

Be a man bastard.


What the frick is a man bastard?
Posted by spacewrangler
In my easy chair with my boots on..
Member since Sep 2009
9750 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:06 pm to
Julio also touched the ball while his foot was touching the ground out of bounds and therefore the ball was dead.

PP7 didn't have complete possession of the ball prior to stepping out and it should have been pass interference.

Bammer in! LOL




Posted by tc5140
Member since Jul 2009
782 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:08 pm to
What the frick is a man bastard?

Be a man about it, you bastard.

better?
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

nd it didn't help that the Replay Official in the press box was an Alabama grad...Gee, I wonder what call I should make ????



since several other aspect of your talking points have been made up, do you have a link?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter