Started By
Message
re: PP7 still mad, pals. Oh he still real mad......
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:45 pm to Monticello
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:45 pm to Monticello
quote:Look, i dont really care, because we werent going to go down and score to win anyway. Bama was the better team. But if you dont think there was enough evidence to overturn the call for this play, then there is no use for replay.
I just love how everyone looks at pictures of PP7 clearly inbounds and thinks that proves something. The issue was not whether he was in bounds. The issue is if he was in bounds with complete control of the ball and if there was "indisputable video evidence" of that, since the call on the field was in incomplete pass.
1
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:45 pm to JuiceTerry
It was a INT.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:45 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:incomplete pass was the initial ruling - after further review - the booth couldn't/wouldn't overturn the initial ruling
but what was the initial ruling on the field?
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:45 pm to Monticello
quote:
I just love how everyone looks at pictures of PP7 clearly inbounds and thinks that proves something. The issue was not whether he was in bounds. The issue is if he was in bounds with complete control of the ball and if there was "indisputable video evidence" of that, since the call on the field was in incomplete pass.
I must have confused you with a credible poster. I really thought you were one of the decent Alabama supporters on here, but you couldn't help it.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:45 pm to Gump
This thread may go places. Let's observe
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:46 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
He was inbounds there, but out of bounds when he got possession.
Uh, no.
Everyone with out any stake in the game called that play an interception. It's been a few years, let go of the bias. Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:46 pm to Gump
Some serious talent in that picture.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:47 pm to Gump
They should have stopped the game, gathered everyone's cameras and looked for this type of evidence.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:47 pm to Gump
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:47 pm to schexyoung
quote:
Uh, no. Everyone with out any stake in the game called that play an interception. It's been a few years, let go of the bias.
Its been a few years, you dont need to claim that everyone who knows the play was called correctly is biased. Let it go, slick.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:47 pm to RT1941
quote:
incomplete pass was the initial ruling - after further review - the booth couldn't/wouldn't overturn the initial ruling
I can see that. I am sure if it was ruled INT on the field, judgment would have been the same(too close to call, ruling stands)
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:47 pm to Gump
Are there new camera angles now? It's over now so we can talk about it with honesty. I remember watching every angle they showed and saying there isn't enough to overturn. At the time of the play I don't remember it being anything other than a close play that went Alabama's way. I was with my best friend who's an LSU fan and I don't remember him even being upset. Hell I remember threads after the game with pictures of the mark his foot made...that's it. All these angles weren't shown here.
It's painfully obvious now that he was in. But at the time it wasn't THIS obvious was it?
It's painfully obvious now that he was in. But at the time it wasn't THIS obvious was it?
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:49 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:It was this obvious at the time. They showed these exact angles. But it didnt matter, LSU wasnt going to go down and score anyway
It's painfully obvious now that he was in. But at the time it wasn't THIS obvious was it?
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:50 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
Let it go, slick.
Sure, chief.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:50 pm to lsupride87
quote:
But it didnt matter, LSU wasnt going to go down and score anyway
They intercepted it at mid field, you have no idea what would have happened.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:51 pm to crimsonian
quote:
Some serious talent in that picture.
I watched the '08 & '09 games the other day (I'm sick of the offseason) and I could literally sit and count up the NFL players on both LSU & Bama sidelines & on the field. DAMN these two programs have pumped out the pro's lately - it's amazing when you look back.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:51 pm to bamaboy87
quote:
Makes up for this shite.
Fair is fair.
They both were pushing each other.Corey Webster was just the stronger man and pushed him down
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:53 pm to Gump
Jesus, he needs to let it go
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:53 pm to lsupride87
quote:
It was this obvious at the time. They showed these exact angles. But it didnt matter, LSU wasnt going to go down and score anyway
Wait, this angle was in the replay?
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:54 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Look, i dont really care, because we werent going to go down and score to win anyway. Bama was the better team. But if you dont think there was enough evidence to overturn the call for this play, then there is no use for replay.
Yeah, the pictures don't prove anything. The SEC just coincidentally decided to invest millions in HD after it.
Probably wouldn't have affected the outcome. They whipped our arse starting the fourth quarter trailing.
This call was more clear than Reid's INT.
Page 2 of 9
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News