re: PP7 still mad, pals. Oh he still real mad......

If the SEC really was engaged in a conspiracy to help Alabama, the Reid INT would have been overturned and ruled a complete pass for Alabama and Clinton-Dix would have been awarded an INT to end the Georgia game. But let's only focus on the close calls that helped Alabama, not the one's that hurt them.

quote:

---

I don't see why they have such a hard time admitting it was a bad call.

---

Do you think we really have a hard time admitting that? I sure don't, but this is comedy gold my man..

quote:

---

We would have likely won that game and possibly gone on to the BCS Championship.

---

Whoa, slow down buddy. We were down 6 with 6 minutes to go and we weren't doing dick on offense so you really can't say that. It just took away a ridiculously good play.

quote:

---

Bama still won the game and eventually the NC. I don't see why they have such a hard time admitting it was a bad call. It's not like it'll make you a bad person or any less of a Bama fan to admit so.

---

I have fully admitted is was very likely an INT. What I dispute is the idea that there was an SEC conspiracy and that photographs can prove possession. If it had been ruled an INT on the field, there is no doubt it would have been confirmed on replay. The "indisputable evidence" burden of proof is what fricked LSU, not the Illuminati.

quote:

---

That one was even more blatant

---

Hmm, I thought the ball was touched before it got to him. therefore can not be PI. I may be wrong.

This is the best angle.

Ain't readin this entire frickup of a thread, but please tell me some Gump references the "push in the back interference interception" in the end zone from ten years ago.

quote:

---

The problem is that everyone at home could see what the replay booth could not. The reason isn't conspiracy, the reason was standard definition in the booth and HD at home. Coincidentally they went to HD after that season.

---

Could very well be the cause as well, and actually makes a lot of sense. it was very close.

quote:

---

NYCAuburn

---

quote:

---

as a neutral party,

---

quote:

---

I thought it was a close call.

---

quote:

---

I think it could have gone either way.

---

quote:

---

I have seen the video multiple times

---

Yet you don't have an opinion? :double casty:

quote:

---

Well technically the replay call was correct since by the rules they have to have DEFINITE evidence to overturn the call on the field. But I admit the call on the field was wrong.

---

Yep. Blamed it on not having HD in the booths.