Started By
Message

Playoff ban

Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:13 am
Posted by Chris_topher
Member since Sep 2012
8258 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:13 am
The CFP is waiting

Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
78593 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:13 am to
Good luck
Posted by pgaddxn
between here and there
Member since Jul 2008
2562 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:13 am to
So are we.
Posted by ColoradoAg
Colorado
Member since Sep 2011
28968 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:14 am to
That is definitely the most likely outcome here.
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
65625 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:15 am to
What did LSU do that is ban worthy? A court of law ruled players eligible. 90% of the SEC schools are playing players that are on paper, not eligible. Some judge somehwhere ruled them eligible. Zero difference in them and LSU.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38981 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:15 am to
quote:


The CFP is waiting


quote:

Playoff ban



so CFP committee is saying, TROs do not matter and any school that plays a player that the NCAA deems ineligible is not eligible to be in the CFP???


if so....LSU accepts the terms. Someone get on the phone with OM and let them know their 2021 grad QB that was deemed ineligible will cost them CFP if he plays

Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38981 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:17 am to
btw I do think this is the way it happens. I dont think LSU plays these kids until everything is clear. But if LSU wins SEC, CFP keeps them out....will be huge lawsuits

if LSU doesnt win SEC...they will just say they are not good enough
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
28134 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:18 am to
quote:

That is definitely the most likely outcome here.


No, I’ve heard from a guy who would know LSU is shutting down - football program, school, system, gone. Presser at 430. Trust me.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
53392 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:19 am to
For what? Playing ineligible players. Well, every team playing a player on an injunction is now banned. They’re all ineligible.

Playing former “pros”? Well, Texas, Oklahoma, USC, Arkansas and Missouri can join in on the fun. Not to mention countless other programs around the country.

Gonna be an awfully thin field this season.
Posted by New Money
Athens, GA
Member since Jun 2023
4711 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:21 am to
GT banned themselves from the playoffs.
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
42823 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:22 am to
Lol we don't even know if we are playoff worthy
Posted by truth22
Member since May 2021
2618 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:28 am to
quote:

What did LSU do that is ban worthy? A court of law ruled players eligible


Actually, it upheld an injunction. This is not a final ruling. There is every chance this will be overturned, and it is amazing that LSU might actually be tempted to play with fire and play these guys.

They have every legal right to do that now, but they also face the possibility of harsh legal implications down the line if they do.

When that happens, I don't want to see all the LSU tears, but I know I will. They really are that reckless. Or clueless.

Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
53392 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:29 am to
quote:

They have every legal right to do that now, but they also face the possibility of harsh legal implications down the line if they do.


Wrong. The whole point of getting an injunction is to prevent retroactive penalties.
Posted by Chris_topher
Member since Sep 2012
8258 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:33 am to
quote:

so CFP committee is saying, TROs do not matter and any school that plays a player that the NCAA deems ineligible is not eligible to be in the CFP??? if so....LSU accepts the terms. Someone get on the phone with OM and let them know their 2021 grad QB that was deemed ineligible will cost them CFP if he plays

Nobody cares about court rulings. The American people don’t want these players on the field, and I have no idea what’s actually motivating the CFP. Either way, LSU’s getting an asterisk next to their name. It’s a bad look — win or lose, you just look weak.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
53392 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:34 am to
quote:

Nobody cares about court rulings. The American people don’t want these players on the field, and I have no idea what’s actually motivating the CFP. Either way, LSU’s getting an asterisk next to their name. It’s a bad look — win or lose, you just look weak.




Michigan just won a title after getting caught cheating in the middle of the season.

No one caresZ
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87774 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:35 am to
I don’t know if the CFP really factors, but yeah I can’t imagine there isn’t some net negative by LSU just gleefully saying they want to deepen the corruption of the game and refusing to back down on that point. Not sure that bill realistically comes due though.
Posted by cajunbama
Metairie
Member since Jan 2007
35829 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:36 am to
Jokes on you fool.











































They aren’t making the playoff
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
72671 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:38 am to
quote:

The American people don’t want these players on the field, and I have no idea what’s actually motivating the CFP. Either way, LSU’s getting an asterisk next to their name. It’s a bad look — win or lose, you just look weak.


So dramatic. Kiffin in the playoffs would cause record numbers of hate watching viewership. Money is king.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38981 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Nobody cares about court rulings. The American people don’t want these players on the field, and I have no idea what’s actually motivating the CFP. Either way, LSU’s getting an asterisk next to their name. It’s a bad look — win or lose, you just look weak.


they dont want kids that graduated in 2021 on the field either but here we are
Posted by DawgsLife
Ellijay, Ga.
Member since Jun 2013
62593 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Playing former “pros”? Well, Texas, Oklahoma, USC, Arkansas and Missouri can join in on the fun. Not to mention countless other programs around the country.

Gonna be an awfully thin field this season.


In fairness, you are naming teams that you suspect will submit names of former NFL players on their 105 man roster. Then, it will depend on how many actually play said players.

I suspect a few teams will submit some names of former NFL players on their roster, but then wait until the dust settles to play them. It will be interesting to see how it all plays out. But teams that submit those names and play some of those players should never complain about NIL or the portal again, or how the college game is ruined.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter