Started By
Message
Posted on 6/26/25 at 2:02 pm to Cimarron
quote:
Paul is often wrong about a lot of things.
Paul knows as much about football as Stephen A Smith knows about basketball, and for some reason ESPN calls both “experts “.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 2:11 pm to Darindawg
quote:The interception king?
Not hardly. But you should be thankful that you got a Notre Dame team that had the luxury of playing us without our starting QB and 3 injured OLinemen.
quote:Yea, Ohio State
Otherwise, they could have very well have got UGA in the natty game. And uh...well, we all know how that would have gone
quote:I hate to admit it but I have nothing to say about that.
"There's the snap. The kick is up...aaaaaaaaaand, he hooked it! Wide left! UGA wins!"
Ahhhh....it never gets old.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 2:17 pm to 3down10
quote:
the standards for winning them was lowered substantially
How is having to win 3 or 4 playoff games instead of 2 lowering the standards?
Posted on 6/26/25 at 2:23 pm to BuckeyeGoon
quote:
How is having to win 3 or 4 playoff games instead of 2 lowering the standards?
Because you can lose 2 football games in the regular season and easily make it. I think that happened like once before in the history of the game?
In the past, in order to win a National Championship, you needed to have a special season. Ohio St's season was so special many of you wanted to fire your coach during the season.
Ohio St literally would not have won the national championship last year if the requirements for making the playoffs weren't lowered. That's just plain out fact. I'm not blaming Ohio St for it, if Alabama did the same thing I'd be like - well that's what happened. Not our fault for the system.
But I'm not going to pretend like it's not a lower standard and that it's not dumb.
And hell, Alabama should have made the playoffs if we're being honest. They were #11 I think, AQ status and what not prevented it. But lets assume they made the playoffs, then won 3 or 4 playoff games to win it all. Telling me that somehow that team, or a team like that, winning the national championship wouldn't be a large marker that it's a lower standard?
Really?
This post was edited on 6/26/25 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 6/26/25 at 2:24 pm to BuckI
quote:
Not according to Paul.
The guy is a shite-stirring talking head. He readily admits that he doesn't know dick about football.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 2:24 pm to BuckI
Ohio State would have been left out of an 8 team format following the loss to UM. A loss like that at home, late in the season, would’ve left a bad taste in the committee members’ mouths. No way 3 Big 10 Teams get in after Oregon and Penn State. (PSU goes bc the committee is not going to penalize them for losing the extra game—same with Texas)
OSU got a ridiculously favorable first two rounds: at home vs Tennessee (game should’ve been played in Knoxville since both of their losses were on the road), followed by a rematch in the Rose Bowl versus Oregon.
All the expanded playoff gave us was a winner who was inconsistent during the regular season, got a do over in the playoff and a free pass after scoring only 10 points to an unranked rival at home.
OSU got a ridiculously favorable first two rounds: at home vs Tennessee (game should’ve been played in Knoxville since both of their losses were on the road), followed by a rematch in the Rose Bowl versus Oregon.
All the expanded playoff gave us was a winner who was inconsistent during the regular season, got a do over in the playoff and a free pass after scoring only 10 points to an unranked rival at home.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 3:06 pm to 3down10
But if Ohio State was that bad shouldn't they have been an easy out for the teams in front of them?
If Oregon or Texas or Georgia were really the best teams shouldn't they have made it deeper into the playoffs?
Oregon had the hardest path to the national championship game than any other #1 team in the history of the playoff era so I'm not seeing how the standards for winning a national championship were lowered.
Edit- also if its so easy to make the playoffs now, why weren't bama and Lsu in?
If Oregon or Texas or Georgia were really the best teams shouldn't they have made it deeper into the playoffs?
Oregon had the hardest path to the national championship game than any other #1 team in the history of the playoff era so I'm not seeing how the standards for winning a national championship were lowered.
Edit- also if its so easy to make the playoffs now, why weren't bama and Lsu in?
This post was edited on 6/26/25 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 6/26/25 at 3:10 pm to BuckI
I'm not gonna lie. I have felt the SEC hasn't been super strong for a few years. As we see this NIL deal continue on, i suspect our absolute and objective dominance won't be quite the same. But then... this is the beginning phase. it will level out, and i'm sure they'll iron some shite out. in the end, it's OUR recruiting beds that are always the hottest.
This post was edited on 6/26/25 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 6/26/25 at 3:14 pm to BuckI
He's gotta stir the pot. His clientele is dying off.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 3:39 pm to m2pro
The B1G presidents always had a love/hate relationship with athletics. They would police their football teams more than the SEC. Now that is no longer an issue.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 3:42 pm to BuckI
quote:
They would police their football teams more than the SEC
Name one SEC school that ever policed its football team even a little. Vanderbilt?
Posted on 6/26/25 at 5:19 pm to Hyena531
quote:
When you beat Texas, you lose!
Joe Burrow just threw another TD!
Posted on 6/26/25 at 5:19 pm to Buckeye06
I bet you still cry over that Javon Bullard hit
Posted on 6/26/25 at 5:24 pm to BuckI
The SEC is so inconsequential that you post this on an SEC forum….as a cuckeye
Posted on 6/26/25 at 7:25 pm to BuckI
You're new to Paul Finebaum I see. Every year for the last 30 years in the doldrums of late June to late July, when no college sports are going on...he literally has nothing to talk about. It's when the show turns into a mix of Jerry Springer and old school WCW professional wrestling where callers cut promos on each other like they're Arn Anderson.
That's when he throws rage bait out there to see how many will bite.
Looks like you bit.
That's when he throws rage bait out there to see how many will bite.
Looks like you bit.
This post was edited on 6/26/25 at 7:27 pm
Posted on 6/26/25 at 7:38 pm to Hyena531
Was elite long before Texas..Oh shite Burrow just tossed another TD.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 7:42 pm to BuckI
Didn’t read….and I downvoted you. Just wanted you to know.
Popular
Back to top


0






