BuckeyeGoon

quote:

---

USC/Texas Rose Bowl will never get old.

---

That game was the end of an era in a lot of ways. It was Keith Jackson's final game and the end of ABC's run of televising the national championship game. It was also the last time an actual bowl game (the rose bowl) was the national championship game. It was probably the last game a lot of people ever watched on a tube tv.

The 2005 season was also the last time a national championship game didn't feature an sec or big ten team and it was really the last game before the SEC's takeover and dominance of sport. Its hard to believe the previous season an undefeated SEC championship was left out of the national championship game, but it shows how different the sport was before and after that USC/Texas game. The first half of the bcs era was full of parity with all the main conferences playing for and winning national championships, the second half was dominated by the sec.

The late 90s to early-mid 2000s really feels like the peak of college football looking back, before the sport went off the rails with money, conference realignments, massive playoff fields, etc.

quote:

---

the Haitian nationals' constitutional claim

---

Its crazy that just anyone can come into this country and start demanding our constitution applies to them

quote:

---

Favorite things yelled after drive

---

None of it was funny. They should cut the sound out immediately after the ball is hit so none of these idiots get on tv.

I'm still a Trump fan but the next logical step was always a more polished and well spoken Donald Trump. Someone who shares Trump's views but is less controversial and more articulate. Both Vance and DeSantis would fit this role. Trump was the bull in the china shop we needed at the time but eventually the movement needs a cleaner leader.

Yeah ignore the people pocket watching what you're spending on balls, if you're driving the ball 265-285 you'll for sure notice a difference playing a good 3 or 4 piece ball compared to say a range ball like someone here mentioned.

The people who get offended when someone spends more than $20 on a dozen balls are worse than the 25 handicaps who play pro v1s.

quote:

---

and a worse ball can actually benefit them in those cases

---

So all that to admit the ball does make a difference. If you're saying a poor player would actually benefit from a bad ball, isnt that the same thing as saying the ball matters?

quote:

---

Issue is I still have those really bad days every few rounds where it will make no difference and cost me $20 in lost balls 

---

Other people have already mentioned them but the maxfli tours are the perfect balance of a great ball playability wise and cheap enough that its not a huge deal if you're spraying balls into the woods that day. I would rather keep a consistent ball instead of switching to a worse ball when I'm playing bad.

Its interesting how people complain about driver distance of tour players but then courses keep removing trees and making courses even more accommodating to just bombing drivers anywhere on every hole. They wouldn't need to worry about driver distances if more courses punished inaccurate tee shots better.

quote:

---

You created a conflation with a double straw man. Impressive

---

Its layers of strawmen and stupidity responding to anything you post, I dont think you even know what you're arguing most of the time.

quote:

---

If the SPLC presents donors who are fine with this behavior and testify this behavior was expected, it's going to be hard to say those investors were defrauded.

---

Were these donors that are willing to defend the splc notated in the indictment documents?

I'm just wondering if anyone else is allowed to make assumptions and draw conclusions that are not literally spelled out in the indictment or are only you allowed to do that?