Started By
Message
re: Oklahoma Too Good Academically For The SEC?
Posted on 5/18/16 at 6:21 am to Ancient Astronaut
Posted on 5/18/16 at 6:21 am to Ancient Astronaut
quote:
Oh the horror. You and your colleagues must have had a good laugh at this over tea and crumpets.
Haha, sorry your whole states sucks so much bro.

Posted on 5/18/16 at 6:27 am to 5thTiger
quote:
Flip Missouri to Tier 2 below Florida. Arkansas up to Tier 3, while flipping Auburn Tennessee and South Carolina down to Tier 4.
Bitch please
Posted on 5/18/16 at 6:50 am to parrothead
quote:
Never once have I heard of OU being a beacon of academic excellence. I'm not saying it's a bad school by any means but definitely not something spectacular. I assume they have a reputable meteorology dept given its geographic location but I have no idea.
Meteorology would be the only reason that I'd go to Oklahoma.
Posted on 5/18/16 at 7:15 am to GetCocky11
On the one hand, yes, it's preposterous for Oklahoma to even insinuate that it belongs in a conference with Stanford and Berkeley--arguably the best private school in the country and the best public school in the world.
On the other hand, you can't really fault them for trying. Being associated with schools like those two would only improve OU's station. It's more that those two schools want nothing to do with Oklahoma.
On the other hand, you can't really fault them for trying. Being associated with schools like those two would only improve OU's station. It's more that those two schools want nothing to do with Oklahoma.
Posted on 5/18/16 at 8:38 am to Belvedere
Best part of all of this is they are stuck in a conference with texas and um, er,
Crap.
Crap.
Posted on 5/18/16 at 10:28 am to Old Money
quote:
National perception is definitely a thing. Outside of Vandy, so many people see every SEC school as some backwoods idiot school. Let them hate
I agree the SEC isn't bad, but it's probably 4th of the 5 conferences right? Behind the Pac, the B1G and the ACC
Posted on 5/18/16 at 12:30 pm to Buckeye06
quote:
I agree the SEC isn't bad, but it's probably 4th of the 5 conferences right? Behind the Pac, the B1G and the ACC
Not necessarily.
Big Ten is #1 by a small margin over the PAC 12. The reason for this is while the PAC 12 has the top public schools as well as academic powers USC and Stanford, it has bottom-feeders such as Arizona State and Oregon State.
The ACC was ahead of the PAC 12 until they added Louisville. That actually put them closer to the SEC.
The Mississippi Schools are what keeps the SEC from passing the ACC.
AAU schools by conference:
Big 10 - All but Nebraska
PAC 12 - Colorado, UCLA, USC, Stanford, Cal-Berkely, Washington, Oregon
ACC - Duke, Wake Forest, Syracuse, Pittsburgh, North Carolina, Virginia, Georgia Tech, Miami
SEC - Vanderbilt, Florida, Texas A&M, Missouri
Big 12 - Texas, Kansas, Iowa State
This post was edited on 5/18/16 at 5:21 pm
Posted on 5/18/16 at 12:49 pm to wrecking crew
Funny how he says the only people who want to go to the sec are fans; as if they don't matter. Lol. They're the ones who pay the fricking bills!
Posted on 5/18/16 at 1:29 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
ACC - Duke, Wake Forest, Syracuse, Pittsburgh, North Carolina, Virginia
Is it fair to judge only on AAU standing? I think GT is now AAU as well, one of the recent adds
I would be surprised if you found many institutions who are not AAU stronger than GT or Miami.
Posted on 5/18/16 at 5:12 pm to Buckeye06
quote:
Is it fair to judge only on AAU standing? I think GT is now AAU as well, one of the recent adds
I would be surprised if you found many institutions who are not AAU stronger than GT or Miami.
It's really not. There are plenty of schools that deserve to be invited to the AAU just based off of how much research money they bring in and their growing academic clout... and there are also plenty of schools currently in the AAU that have grandfathered their way in and should no longer be there. Selectivity is what makes it desirable.. if they invited everybody that fits the criteria then it's no longer really that desirable.
There's also been articles written about the AAU's bias against Southern universities.. specifically those in the Deep South. It'll take a long time to change perception, but in terms of actual classroom and research academics, Southern flagship universities aren't far off from their northern and western counterparts in academic prowess. With the University of Georgia leading the way, I predict schools like Auburn, Alabama, Tennessee, South Carolina and LSU will be on par with their Big 10, ACC and Pac 12 counterparts in another 20 or 30 years.
Now whether rankings and public perception will reflect that is a different story.. but in terms of actual classroom learning opportunities and research capabilities there won't be much of a difference. In 20 or 30 years a young adult will be able to get the same quality of education at those schools listed above as they could at a Washington or Penn State.
Posted on 5/18/16 at 6:28 pm to ColoradoElkHerd
It's pretty common thought that when you live in Texas you're first choice is Texas and a&m. When you don't get in you apply to tech and OU and go to one of those. OU academics are shite. Have u ever been to Oklahoma? If you are a public institution and have high requirements in Oklahoma you would have about 500 enrollment
Posted on 5/18/16 at 6:35 pm to wrecking crew
Oklahoma bill would make AP U.S. History history
quote:
Some lawmakers in Oklahoma want to make Advanced Placement U.S. History history. What's their beef? The course, which was redesigned by the College Board and implemented in high school classrooms last year, isn't quite pro-America enough. "In essence, we have a new emphasis on what is bad about America," said state representative Dan Fisher, the measure's chief sponsor.
Posted on 5/18/16 at 6:35 pm to CapstoneGrad06
The WR Courtney Gardner went to OU because he couldn't get into Arkansas becuase he didn't' have the necessary math credits
Posted on 5/18/16 at 7:06 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
The Aggies should be in the Tier 1 for sheep chasing and cult activities
Posted on 5/18/16 at 10:42 pm to Spindicus Lofrus
Their football graduation rate was 65% last year, up 12 points from three years ago. People in glass houses...
Posted on 5/18/16 at 11:53 pm to wrecking crew
Maybe I don't get it. Why do schools care about the academics of the other schools in their conference. Focus on your school..
That is like a high school refusing to play it's rival because they have a lesser graduation rate than them.
That is like a high school refusing to play it's rival because they have a lesser graduation rate than them.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 6:51 am to AlaCrimsonTide06
I think the academic initiative of the SEC is a good thing and a step in the right direction. With that being said, I have never understood why UGA and Auburn were not AAU schools as both have excellent academics. I would be proud for my daughter to go to either of them if TAMU didn't work out for her.
I also do not honestly understand how OU can look at the SEC and bash our academics when they are in the same conference as Texas Tech, OSU, and KSU. Our friends in Austin told us the same thing.
I also do not honestly understand how OU can look at the SEC and bash our academics when they are in the same conference as Texas Tech, OSU, and KSU. Our friends in Austin told us the same thing.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 7:30 am to wrecking crew
He also says that OU looks at joining the Pac 12 as a way to "enhance" its academic standing and that OU folks don't want the challenge of playing football in the SEC.
"The SEC is about the same as the Big 12. Big 12 used to be better and then the SEC got two of the better academic institutions from the Big 12 and sort of tilted it."
"The SEC is about the same as the Big 12. Big 12 used to be better and then the SEC got two of the better academic institutions from the Big 12 and sort of tilted it."
Popular
Back to top
