Started By
Message
re: Ok, just saw the Devin white hit.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 10:55 am to Jrv2damac
Posted on 10/22/18 at 10:55 am to Jrv2damac
quote:
And you’re just another Arkansas fan trying to salvage his existence with trolling and awful analysis
A common sight here honestly
quote:
Yes, cycle through your SEC rant catch phrase Rolodex
0
Posted on 10/22/18 at 10:56 am to Jrv2damac
quote:
I can call a poster stupid for using 9/11 as a comparison to an argument about a football personal foul without being mad
What?
quote:
But keep making good use of your break time at Kroger’s
Lol there isn't even a Kroger within 50 miles of me.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 10:57 am to Evolved Simian
this ain't it chief
Posted on 10/22/18 at 11:04 am to Tigerbait231
sorry, but we all know that won't happen
Posted on 10/22/18 at 11:06 am to rockiee
quote:
I'm sure you have posted a bunch on the subject but do you think it just comes down to bad refs making a terrible call or do you believe there is something more to it?
I think the SEC offices inherently protect their golden goose, which is Bama by a mile, but it's not some conspiracy. Bama is the most important program in the SEC and they are treated accordingly.
ETA: I'm not saying they threw White out to help Bama. I just think White getting thrown out while Wilson didn't illustrates the favoritism.
This post was edited on 10/22/18 at 11:07 am
Posted on 10/22/18 at 11:08 am to RB10
Actually after watching not they aren’t the same hit and I’m more convinced In the White hit.
Mack open his arms and drives through the tackle while White has a slight launch. I just did a dual monitor look about 50 times and asked some people in the office. I’m not trying to be a homer I’m just telling you what I see. I only have 1 angle on the Mack hit as well. Like I said the biggest difference I see is White seems to have a slight launch and the hands.
Mack open his arms and drives through the tackle while White has a slight launch. I just did a dual monitor look about 50 times and asked some people in the office. I’m not trying to be a homer I’m just telling you what I see. I only have 1 angle on the Mack hit as well. Like I said the biggest difference I see is White seems to have a slight launch and the hands.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 11:11 am to CrimsonBoz
Also something I noticed in the video. The ref who throws the initial flag is behind the hit. I know they are reviewing this but that could also factor in this. If you watch from his angle it actually looks worse.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 11:12 am to CrimsonBoz
There looked like there was helmet to helmet in Wilsons too. With his crown down
Posted on 10/22/18 at 11:12 am to CrimsonBoz
quote:
Actually after watching not they aren’t the same hit and I’m more convinced In the White hit.
Mack open his arms and drives through the tackle while White has a slight launch. I just did a dual monitor look about 50 times and asked some people in the office. I’m not trying to be a homer I’m just telling you what I see. I only have 1 angle on the Mack hit as well. Like I said the biggest difference I see is White seems to have a slight launch and the hands.
Shocker.
By the way, what you're "seeing" shows that you're a homer.
This post was edited on 10/22/18 at 11:14 am
Posted on 10/22/18 at 11:13 am to RB10
quote:
RB10
Your delusion is alarming.
Fact: DW is suspended for targeting, an act he committed, whether you admit it or not.
Fact: Alabama had nothing to do with it.
Fact: There is no SEC conspiracy against LSU.
Fact: Alabama fans are entertained by the normalized level of insanity and paranoia from LSU.
Suggestion: Seek counseling.
Have a nice day, friend.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 11:15 am to RB10
quote:
ETA: I'm not saying they threw White out to help Bama. I just think White getting thrown out while Wilson didn't illustrates the favoritism.
I think that is reasonable. I also think subconsciously refs could be giving Bama the benefit of the doubt just because of how good they are when it comes to "close calls".
I just can't get behind a ref sitting there waiting for a questionable play and looking to throw out the LSU player in the 2nd half so that it effects the 1st half of the game in two weeks. Is it possible? Sure but I don't think so. I will agree that the fact it was reviewed makes it look about 100 times worse than just a ref making a terrible play while it is happening live. More than anything the rule needs to be addressed.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 11:15 am to stat19
quote:
Fact: DW is suspended for targeting, an act he committed, whether you admit it or not.
As has been proven wrong, multiple times.
quote:
Fact: Alabama had nothing to do with it.
Fact: There is no SEC conspiracy against LSU.
I've literally never claimed either of these things.
quote:
Fact: Alabama fans are entertained by the normalized level of insanity and paranoia from LSU.
Meanwhile, LSU fans are entertained by the blind homerism being portrayed by Bama fans.
quote:
Suggestion: Seek counseling.
Being objective means I need to seek counseling. Ok then.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 11:17 am to RB10
I have LSU alum in my office and they see the differences. Would you like a video of them holding their degrees and saying it’s ok to be objective?
Posted on 10/22/18 at 11:18 am to CrimsonBoz
quote:
I have LSU alum in my office and they see the differences. Would you like a video of them holding their degrees and saying it’s ok to be objective?
Of course there are slight differences, but they are extremely slight. Both make contact with the chest and incidental contact with the helmet. That's not the point though.
The point is neither was targeting as the rule is written, and claiming differently shows your bias. You're biased. It's ok to admit it to be honest.
This post was edited on 10/22/18 at 11:20 am
Posted on 10/22/18 at 11:18 am to Sun God
I’m not seeing the launch though it’s a follow through from what I’m seeing but doesn’t matter I think we have sailed this ship far enough.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 11:20 am to RB10
What I’m saying is I see two differences that lead me to believe a targeting call and not. Either way, we have a great game to look forward. Glad we had a reasonable conversation.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 11:20 am to AshLSU
Why do these fricktards refuse to read the rule?!!
Posted on 10/22/18 at 11:23 am to CrimsonBoz
quote:
What I’m saying is I see two differences that lead me to believe a targeting call and not.
No you don't. What you see is an Alabama player and a LSU player initiating contact in the same way and you can't accept that neither, or both, should be targeting.
There's nothing in the White hit that falls under the rule of targeting.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 11:24 am to RB10
quote:
As has been proven wrong, multiple times.
Boudreaux and Thibadeaux have no value in this conversation.
The Louisiana Governor is certain what sportsball rule is being discussed.
In essence, no it hasn’t been disproven. Try Adrain, Sparky.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 11:24 am to stat19
quote:
Fact: DW is suspended for targeting, an act he committed, whether you admit it or not.
Fact: Alabama had nothing to do with it.
Fact: There is no SEC conspiracy against LSU.
Fact: Alabama fans are entertained by the normalized level of insanity and paranoia from LSU.
None of this has anything to do with what we're talking about. quote:
Have a nice day, friend.
And there's the white flag.
Props. You earned that L
Page 8 of 9
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News