Started By
Message

re: Mizzou's Webb Prevails in Court

Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:25 pm to
Posted by captdalton
Member since Feb 2021
26034 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:25 pm to
A Tuscaloosa judge also ruled that signing a pro contract makes a player ineligible to return to college.

I believe that was the first court ruling on a pro trying to return to college.

It will be interesting to see if appeal or federal judges will consider that as precedent.

At this point the SEC plans to file a federal lawsuit, and hopes the judge will order a stay on all of this until the hearing. That will shut all this down until then.

There is no way college football can operate if different local judges are making conflicting rulings on the same issue.
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
31065 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

he was never under contract

If he signed a waiver of any kind or received room or any per diem, he was under a contract with that organization.
They would not let him participate with a waiver.
Posted by Windy City
Member since Jun 2019
2335 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

that are trying to finish their college career under the NCAA’s own rules


This is not the case. 5 for 5 eligibility only applies to Class of 2027 onward and the pro restrictions are still very much in place.
Posted by LOTOTiger
MiddleofNoWhere
Member since May 2025
320 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

So yall are kicked out too now?


Wait.... has this been a conspiracy all along by LSU (knowing Mizzou plays the first game) to get us "yankees" kicked out of the conference?
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
31065 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

The conferences have decided to draw a line in the sand where NFL players are concerned. How far it goes will be interesting to watch.

Kind of like the line they drew when they invited TAMU in and then added Tejas. Sankey is a liar, a dumbass and a weasel.
I’ve been saying for 30 years now, the SEC needed to be completely overhauled including the location.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52856 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

This is not the case. 5 for 5 eligibility only applies to Class of 2027 onward and the pro restrictions are still very much in place.


Wrong.

The SEC and NCAA have already granted several players an extra year under the new rule. Hence the lawsuits.

Seriously, do any of you ever get tired of being incorrect all the time?
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
53943 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

You took the time to point out, incorrectly, 25 years old.
I successfully pointed out those dudes aint kids.

You lose
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 12:34 pm
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52856 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

I successfully pointed out those dudes aint kids.

You lose


Getting repeatedly made to look foolish has broken you.
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
53943 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Getting repeatedly made to look foolish has broken you.

I just punted you over your BS about Harris Vs Texas kid.

Sit down kid
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
47172 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:37 pm to
I guess Kiffin did it because they are called Tigers too
Posted by Che Boludo
Member since May 2009
22219 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Honestly, it is kind of BS that the NCAA made their eligibilty ruling after the NFL held these camps - but of course they were too inept to foresee the huge legal hole they were stepping in.

I hope the next step is that every former player who did not go onto the pros and only played 4 years fights for their extra year, while contesting the ambiguous age restriction as well.

Let's just watch it all burn.
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
8728 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

"The order against Mizzou would keep the school from holding or reducing revenue sharing or name, image and likeness proceeds Webb could receive."


That is amazing to me. What a freaking cluster.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52856 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

I just punted you over your BS about Harris Vs Texas kid.

Sit down kid




You did the exact opposite and were made out to be an idiot, again.

Posted by LOTOTiger
MiddleofNoWhere
Member since May 2025
320 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

A Tuscaloosa judge also ruled that signing a pro contract makes a player ineligible to return to college.


In Webb's case, he never had an NFL contract - only attended a mini-camp / tryout. I'm just clarifying that - not saying it's right or wrong. I can understand the players argument here. He probably would have not attended that camp knowing he had a sure thing with another year of eligibilty in college - but the NCAA didn't change the rule before the camps, and even then they initially were not including last years class. That took legal action.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52856 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

I can understand the players argument here. He probably would have not attended that camp knowing he had a sure thing with another year of eligibilty in college - but the NCAA didn't change the rule before the camps, and even then they initially were not including last years class. That took legal action.


Bingo
Posted by TeeteringBrink
Member since Feb 2007
1430 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

We’ve been trying to explain this to you people for a while now. It didn’t start with LSU, and it’s not just LSU doing it now.

wtf are you talking about?

On second thought, nvm. Run along now.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52856 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

wtf are you talking about?

On second thought, nvm. Run along now.


Are you still pretending you’re a lawyer? Difficult to believe considering you seem to have a lot of trouble reading.
Posted by LOTOTiger
MiddleofNoWhere
Member since May 2025
320 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

If he signed a waiver of any kind or received room or any per diem


Not sure I agree with that. I've been paid travel and meal expenses by prospective employers to travel to job interviews. I've also signed NDAs with them, which is a legal document, but in no way was an employment contract.
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
28010 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:55 pm to
Drink said outright that if he has the option to add players, he is. Just like other SEC coaches…
Posted by stopitnow1
Florida
Member since Mar 2013
2643 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:56 pm to
They do sign a NFL tryout agreement, right?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter