Started By
Message
re: Mizzou leads its series with Arkansas 12-4.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 10:02 pm to Faurot fodder
Posted on 8/7/26 at 10:02 pm to Faurot fodder
quote:
The now.
Live there
Well then. 1-0. See ya in Columbia.
1
Posted on 8/7/26 at 10:07 pm to QBUMizzou
Well you got that going for you.... ??
Posted on 8/7/26 at 10:07 pm to SoonerKA1999
I like that.
Especially compared to our overall head-to-head record.
Especially compared to our overall head-to-head record.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 10:28 pm to Faurot fodder
quote:
Especially compared to our overall head-to-head record.
Yeah, it's embarassing. I get it.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 10:33 pm to Dannywanger19
Free unsolicited advice for piggie fans:
Posted on 8/7/26 at 11:00 pm to QBUMizzou
Hobo fight
Posted on 8/8/26 at 12:35 am to QBUMizzou
The SEC should swap Arkansas for Rice.
We will bring wayyy more academic prestige while still holding their mantle of sucking arse at football
We will bring wayyy more academic prestige while still holding their mantle of sucking arse at football
Posted on 8/8/26 at 12:59 am to Dannywanger19
You are a frickn idiot! Higher ceiling for what? The past is the past. They have Walmart money, that’s it. Missouri sports has been mismanaged, no doubt, do some homework & compare the states.MO is bigger, richer, more people, more potential in the NIL era. Walmart money is great, but MO gets a piece of that as well, on top of beating AR in every metric you run. Again, your comment is idiotic & biased. So shut up already.
Posted on 8/8/26 at 5:49 am to Red Eagle
quote:
I thought MIssouri and Arkansas were rivals?
Are they not?
Yes they're rivals.
Posted on 8/8/26 at 5:50 am to QBUMizzou
Arkansad sucks dick. You want a cookie?
Posted on 8/8/26 at 8:51 am to dchog
quote:
If Arkansas made better hires then and if Silverfied ends of being a good hire then yes Arkansas might have a higher potential than Missouri which isn't that big of a stretch.
I have yet to hear how? Youre both mid tier programs, with Arkansas being a lower mid tier program in the 21st century. Missouri has had much more success in the most competitive era of the sport. I have yet to hear how Arkansas has a higher ceiling.
quote:
One of the appealing things about the Arkansas program to Frank Broyles was the no pro sports or major universities that would be rivals. That was a rarity then and even now.
That’s been the case the entire time an Arkansas has never been a contender in the SEC. Don’t know how this situation somehow makes it have a higher ceiling than Mizzou.
Posted on 8/8/26 at 8:58 am to Drewbie
quote:
And the only teams to go to Atlanta out of the West more than Arkansas in that time frame were Alabama and LSU, and LSU only went once more than Arkansas did.
This makes you a good program? Lmao You were 0-3 and got blown out by 30+ points in 2 of the 3 championship games.
quote:
I'll do both. You're ignorant.
Anyone who believes they are a good program when they average 6-6 is obviously the ignorant one. Or just delusional.
Posted on 8/8/26 at 9:05 am to gamecockman12
Arkansas doesn't have a rivalry in the SEC. That died decades ago when Arkansas left the SWC.
Every so called rivalry game has been manufactured when the SEC began doing the trophy games in the 90s.
Every so called rivalry game has been manufactured when the SEC began doing the trophy games in the 90s.
Posted on 8/8/26 at 10:17 am to FireDanMullen
Because Arkansas isn't on the same page as an entire organization and lack a centralized government, a figure that can make the right decisions. It's been a power vacuum since 2008. Everything is discombobulated.
The BOT and wealthy individuals have been fighting for control ever since. That gives you Bert, Chad and Pittman. Arkansas fans have enjoyed 50 years of someone making decisions for them. Now they have dumbasses running things.
Look at the support for all sports not just football for both schools and that will give you an answer.
The BOT and wealthy individuals have been fighting for control ever since. That gives you Bert, Chad and Pittman. Arkansas fans have enjoyed 50 years of someone making decisions for them. Now they have dumbasses running things.
Look at the support for all sports not just football for both schools and that will give you an answer.
Posted on 8/8/26 at 10:27 am to Faurot fodder
Missouris O/U on wins this year is set at 6.5
Again we both suck at football. Missouri doesn’t beat good teams in football.
You suck at football and supposed to be a basketball school but you suck at that as well
Again we both suck at football. Missouri doesn’t beat good teams in football.
You suck at football and supposed to be a basketball school but you suck at that as well
Posted on 8/8/26 at 10:36 am to Golfer1
quote:
Missouris O/U on wins this year is set at 6.5 Again we both suck at football. Missouri doesn’t beat good teams in football.
So you use one bad year, based on predictions only, to put us in your sh*tty category, while ignoring the past decades?
Nice trick. lol.
Mizzou owns you.
Everyone owns you.
We are not top tier, but Mizzou doesn’t suck at football.
Arkansas does.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News