Started By
Message
Malzahn for $7M or Matt Luke for $3M?
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:09 pm
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:09 pm
Which contract is worse?
8
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:12 pm to GreyReb
Luke's and it's because we actually hired his stupid arse
This post was edited on 1/2/18 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:12 pm to GreyReb
You paid the guy that couldn't beat Bert 3 million?
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:13 pm to GreyReb
Luke
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:16 pm to GreyReb
Luke. I would rather grossly over pay for a chance at a title than slightly over pay to compete for 5th in the division.
ETA: And by "I would rather over pay" I mean "I would rather the boosters over pay"
ETA: And by "I would rather over pay" I mean "I would rather the boosters over pay"
This post was edited on 1/2/18 at 2:17 pm
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:17 pm to GreyReb
Orgeron 3m
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:22 pm to GreyReb
quote:
Which contract is worse?
tough call; but have to go with the Rebs
Auburn did what they felt they had to do to keep their coach - that Arkansas opening was real
Ole Miss? I mean; does anyone believe he wouldn't have accepted $1,000,000 a year???
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:23 pm to GreyReb
Why did OM pay a guy $3M they could’ve got for literally half that? Put some escalators in there for performance or revenue.
Some ADs have lost their minds.
Some ADs have lost their minds.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:25 pm to GreyReb
Giving Luke anything over 1.5 is moronic
Posted on 1/2/18 at 3:13 pm to Henry Jones Jr
Auburn ponied up to gus because of 8 quarters of football at the end of the year. Then gus returned to normal. That's a bad look.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 3:17 pm to the808bass
quote:
Why did OM pay a guy $3M they could’ve got for literally half that?
Is this a real question? The answer to this is the same answer for literally anything else Ole Miss related: Image.
This post was edited on 1/2/18 at 3:18 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News