Started By
Message
Looks like the final opt-out count is 10 ...
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:13 am
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:13 am
But how many of them have winning records?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:14 am to scrooster
Why is fsu not playing? They need practices in the worst way. That is nuts
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:16 am to scrooster
Does no one enjoy playing football anymore. It’s like people are only playing a kids game unless they are being paid. I do not understand this.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:16 am to scrooster
X post states ten, then lists 11 teams lol. That math ain’t mathin
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:16 am to scrooster
With Auburn opting out, they should not be eligible for any bowl revenue sharing.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:16 am to FootballFrenzy
How much money are they forfeiting? Like $1M each that’s supposed to go to the conference pot?
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:18 am to Nasty_Canasta
Rutgers listed twice.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:18 am to scrooster
Notre Dame 10-2
Kansas State 6-6
Kansas 5-7
Iowa State 8-4
Florida State 5-7
Auburn 5-7
UCF 5-7
Baylor 5-7
Rutgers 5-7
Temple 5-7
Kansas State 6-6
Kansas 5-7
Iowa State 8-4
Florida State 5-7
Auburn 5-7
UCF 5-7
Baylor 5-7
Rutgers 5-7
Temple 5-7
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:18 am to scrooster
quote:Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
I get why the schools that changed coaches are doing it.
shite like Norvell & Aranda doing it make no sense.
Rutgers made the list twice...
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:19 am to scrooster
The teams playing in the bowl games have not been the same starters that played during the season. Too many player opting out due to portal or draft.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:19 am to scrooster
I imagine the seniors from these 5-7 teams assumed the seasons were over and have been checked out of the programs for weeks. Not to mention the guys who plan to transfer.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:19 am to scrooster
Rutgers is so pissed about the bowls they said it twice
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:20 am to scrooster
Expand the playoffs, get rid of the bowls
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:22 am to Boodis Man
quote:
Why is fsu not playing?
Because they are some bitches who don't want to risk being embarrassed on television again. That program is back to being pre Bowden irrelevant because they can't afford to fire Norvell and are not attractive enough to hire a good coach even if they had the money.
You love to see it.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:23 am to scrooster
I'd like to know more about the business of bowls.
I do know schools are on the hook for tickets and travel. Not sure if the smaller bowls would bring the money that a school would need.
I do know schools are on the hook for tickets and travel. Not sure if the smaller bowls would bring the money that a school would need.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:25 am to ExpoTiger
quote:
Does no one enjoy playing football anymore. It’s like people are only playing a kids game unless they are being paid. I do not understand this.
I'm guessing alot of backups and walkons are pissed, they would have loved to play.
Schools are either losing money on these games or they don't wanna play with scrubs and look bad.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:25 am to Pickle_Weasel
quote:
With Auburn opting out, they should not be eligible for any bowl revenue sharing.
Sound logic. You gotta do you part if you want a slice of the pie.
That said, 5-win bowl teams does seem a little ridiculous.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:27 am to Jobu93
quote:
I'd like to know more about the business of bowls
Bowls are money losers for most schools.
It costs more to go than can be recovered by participating.
Those schools wouldn't cime close to selkung their required ticket allotment either ... they'd lose money all the way around.
Popular
Back to top


13









