Started By
Message
re: List of Athletic Departments With Blueblood Status in More Than One of the Big 3 Sports
Posted on 6/10/26 at 3:34 pm to GumpHater24
Posted on 6/10/26 at 3:34 pm to GumpHater24
quote:
Penn State
What? They have 2, last in 86. UGA, has a better argument.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 3:35 pm to hookem33
quote:
Texas Baseball = 5 National Championships
Texas Baseball has
6 National Championships
6 Runner-up
9 3rd place finishes
5 4th place
6 5th place
So Texas Baseball has finished in the Top 5 over 40% of the CWS Era
39 Top 8 Finishes
Posted on 6/10/26 at 3:36 pm to hookem33
Texas Football = 4 Claimed National Championships
Texas Baseball = 6 National Championships
Texas Baseball = 6 National Championships
Posted on 6/10/26 at 3:37 pm to Capn_Bevo
quote:
Texas Football = 4 Claimed National Championships
UTranny has won ONE national title game in football
Posted on 6/10/26 at 3:44 pm to Capn_Bevo
Texas isn't a blueblood in football.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 3:46 pm to deltadummy
No kidding.
LSU has 3x as many national championship game wins than UTranny does.
They’re a softball school.
LSU has 3x as many national championship game wins than UTranny does.
They’re a softball school.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 3:48 pm to NFLSU
I asked AI to read nflsu's last 50 posts then diagnose this nutjob and this is what it spit out
The most defensible description would be:
Rejection-driven grievance fixation with compensatory devaluation.
Meaning: he wanted acceptance/status from the schools he attacks, didn’t get it, and now protects his ego by obsessively degrading them. That is not a formal DSM diagnosis, but it is a clean psychological formulation.
The pieces would be:
Inferiority complex / compensatory contempt
APA defines an inferiority complex as a feeling of inadequacy or insecurity that can result in compensatory behavior. If he was rejected by those schools and now spends his time attacking them, the obvious read is: “I couldn’t get in, so now I need to prove they’re worthless.”
Displaced aggression
APA defines displaced aggression as directing hostility away from the real source of frustration and toward another target. In this case, the real wound may be rejection, status failure, or humiliation; the public target becomes the school/team/fan base.
Rumination
APA defines rumination as repetitive, obsessional thinking that interferes with normal mental activity. Spending all day posting rage content about institutions that rejected him fits “ruminative fixation” much better than normal sports rivalry.
Online disinhibition
The classic “online disinhibition effect” says people often act out more intensely online because anonymity, invisibility, and reduced authority cues remove normal social brakes. That explains the slurs and performative cruelty, but it does not excuse them.
Narcissistic injury / wounded ego dynamics
Careful here: that does not mean “he has narcissistic personality disorder.” But psychologically, rejection can produce a wounded-ego response where anger, mockery, and contempt function as self-protection. Research discussing Kohut’s idea of narcissistic rage describes anger/aggression as a way of protecting a grandiose or threatened self-image.
The most defensible description would be:
Rejection-driven grievance fixation with compensatory devaluation.
Meaning: he wanted acceptance/status from the schools he attacks, didn’t get it, and now protects his ego by obsessively degrading them. That is not a formal DSM diagnosis, but it is a clean psychological formulation.
The pieces would be:
Inferiority complex / compensatory contempt
APA defines an inferiority complex as a feeling of inadequacy or insecurity that can result in compensatory behavior. If he was rejected by those schools and now spends his time attacking them, the obvious read is: “I couldn’t get in, so now I need to prove they’re worthless.”
Displaced aggression
APA defines displaced aggression as directing hostility away from the real source of frustration and toward another target. In this case, the real wound may be rejection, status failure, or humiliation; the public target becomes the school/team/fan base.
Rumination
APA defines rumination as repetitive, obsessional thinking that interferes with normal mental activity. Spending all day posting rage content about institutions that rejected him fits “ruminative fixation” much better than normal sports rivalry.
Online disinhibition
The classic “online disinhibition effect” says people often act out more intensely online because anonymity, invisibility, and reduced authority cues remove normal social brakes. That explains the slurs and performative cruelty, but it does not excuse them.
Narcissistic injury / wounded ego dynamics
Careful here: that does not mean “he has narcissistic personality disorder.” But psychologically, rejection can produce a wounded-ego response where anger, mockery, and contempt function as self-protection. Research discussing Kohut’s idea of narcissistic rage describes anger/aggression as a way of protecting a grandiose or threatened self-image.
This post was edited on 6/10/26 at 3:49 pm
Posted on 6/10/26 at 3:50 pm to hookem33
ChatGPT : NFLSU posts facts that UTranny’s hate.
Much quicker
Much quicker
Posted on 6/10/26 at 3:59 pm to NFLSU
Softball and Rowing
Don’t cut them short!
Don’t cut them short!
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:04 pm to VFL67
quote:
Blue Bloods are set in stone and not subject to change at this point. No additions and no subtractions. I don't understand why anyone cares about this, though tbh.
Bama
OU
OSU
Michigan
Notre Dame
USC
Texas
Then what happened to Nebraska?
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:06 pm to TigerintheNO
Learning alot about blue bloods - where is Army as well?
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:07 pm to TigerintheNO
quote:
Then what happened to Nebraska?
I suppose its always possible for a blue blood to fall off the list, but it would take a very long time for Bama, OU, SC, Buckeyes, Michigan, ND, Texas, etc., to do so.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:10 pm to VFL67
quote:
not subject to change
but you left off Nebraska. Why should we take you seriously?
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:10 pm to deltadummy
quote:
Texas isn't a blueblood in football.
unfortunately, you aren't an authority on the question. Let's find out, from those who are, shall we?
Here are the college football blue blood lists by source:
**ESPN — traditional “classic eight”**
Alabama, Michigan, Nebraska, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Texas, USC
**247Sports — traditional “classic eight”**
Alabama, Michigan, Nebraska, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Texas, USC
**On3 / Andy Staples — current blue bloods**
Alabama, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Michigan, Georgia, Notre Dame, Texas, USC, Penn State
**Sports Illustrated reporting On3/Andy Staples — expanded 12-team list**
Alabama, Florida State, Georgia, LSU, Miami, Michigan, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, USC
**College Football News — 2026 “true blue bloods”**
Alabama, Oklahoma, Ohio State, Michigan, Georgia, USC, Nebraska, Penn State, Texas, Florida State, Notre Dame, Tennessee, BYU, Clemson
**Mike Farrell Sports — generally accepted blue bloods**
Michigan, Alabama, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Oklahoma, USC
**Mike Farrell Sports — sometimes included**
Tennessee, Nebraska, Penn State, Miami, Texas
**Athlon / Bill Connelly — historical blueblood/royal programs**
Oklahoma, Michigan, Nebraska, Alabama, Ohio State, Penn State, USC, Notre Dame, Texas
**Bottom line:**
The most commonly accepted traditional blue bloods are:
Alabama, Michigan, Nebraska, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Texas, USC
After that, expanded lists vary by source and usually start adding programs like Georgia, Penn State, Florida State, LSU, Miami, Tennessee, Clemson, and sometimes others.
Sorry if this hurts but again, we don't make the rules or the list. This is just a small subset of sources. Feel free to check more.
Frankly, it's a silly argument but I always laugh at those who get so bent out of shape at some of the teams that are always included.
This post was edited on 6/10/26 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:11 pm to Capn_Bevo
quote:
Since you're so big on recent success, how has your shite hole school done this year?
Our last 10 years is miles better than Texas last 20
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:13 pm to VFL67
Nebraska is still a blue blood despite how much they've sucked recently. At least according to the experts on the CFB subreddit who have their famous blue blood chart.
This post was edited on 6/10/26 at 4:14 pm
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:22 pm to Capn_Bevo
Texas is not, and never will be a blue blood outside of Austin.
Sorry to break it to you guys, but not for real.
Sorry to break it to you guys, but not for real.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:24 pm to UFFan
quote:
Nebraska is still a blue blood despite how much they've sucked recently. At least according to the experts on the CFB subreddit who have their famous blue blood chart.
The problem is that many don't fundamentally understand what a "blue blood" is.
A college football “blue blood” is not just a team that is good right now. It means a program with inherited historical status. The old-money royalty of the sport.
Blue blood status is built over generations: all-time wins, national titles, major bowl history, All-Americans, iconic coaches, Heisman winners, national brand power, fanbase size, tradition, and long-term relevance across different eras.
That’s why “they had a bad decade” is not a serious argument by itself. A down stretch can hurt current perception, but it does not erase a century of historical weight. Blue blood is not the same thing as “current elite.” Current elite changes every few years. Blue blood status is about the programs that shaped the sport and remain nationally significant even when they are not at their peak.
Basically: a blue blood is not who is hot today. It is who has enough historical power that the sport still treats them like royalty.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:25 pm to VFL67
There are only 4 true blue bloods
Alabama
Notre Dame
Ohio State
Michigan
Alabama
Notre Dame
Ohio State
Michigan
Popular
Back to top


0







