deltadummy

There's a difference between running and jumping and jumping from a stationary position within 1 yard of scrimmage. Then there's jumping over a gap vs a player. I think a stationary position allows you to leap over a player, aside from the snapper. Not absolutely sure.

But you absolutely cannot put your hand on a player as that would constitute leverage.

But I ain't mad. I'm a Bama fan. Better team won today. Refs ain't to blame.

Gg, Sooners.

:cheers:

Hope you win your last two.

Ty is too fixated on #5.

Quantum referring. It's only a catch if we observe it, and even then it can still be complete or incomplete.

This is the SEC wanting to be accurate with Ty's passing stats. He's a contender for some awards. I applaud the attempt at accuracy.

quote:

---

Weekly LSU Whining Checklist

[ ] Refs in the LSU game

[X] Refs in the Bama game

[ ] Refs in games that happened years ago

[ ] Refs in games that haven't been played yet

[X ] Location of SEC offices

[ ] SEC schedule makers

[ ] Their own administration

[ ] Their own fans

[ ] Their own coaches

[X] "Biased" announcers

[ ] "Biased" polls and playoff rankings
(Not relevant to LSU this season )

[ ] "Biased" Heisman Trophy and other postseason award voters
(Not relevant to LSU this season )

[ ] Location of SEC Championship Game
(Not relevant to LSU this season )

---

You missed the complaint about Bham.

If the LSU bitc - posters would get to it, they could have this thing completed in just a few minutes. They may not be up yet, though. Aluminum foil does a really good job of blocking the sunlight.

Is that the one or all of em?

quote:

---

I don't have a philopophy.

You and some others are so emotional about this bill that all you can do is disparage any poster who asks why the THC restriction is bad.

Put another way, why did congress think restricting THC is a good thing?

They had to have some reason to believe that. So, what was it?

---

:lol:

Telling you we want our freedom to use this drug is "emotional". Got it. The same retort most in the other forum use when someone calls em out.

You ask why but won't answer "why" yourself. Also got it. Lick the government boot, boy.

quote:

---

That's sweet but using your logic all prisons should release their inmates, heroin should be legalized and made available for profit and all police departments & criminal courts should be abolished. Total freedom!!! YAY!!

So, I'll ask a different way, what was the motivation for congress to pass the restriction on THC referred to in the OP?

Was it a health concern? Does it cause behavior that is dangerous to users and/or others?

---

Boy, this was a dumb reply. So edgy and intelligent to equate hemp products with essentially anarchy. Heroin is substantially more addictive than hemp drinks, but you seem to think they're equal, but maybe you don't know that or have some edgy answer up your sleeve to equate the two.

Is it a health concern? Is alcohol? Are cigs? Are 32 oz cokes?

Does it cause behavior that is dangerous to others? No, it doesn't. People are dangerous to others without the use of drugs. Hemp products don't cause aggressiveness anymore than being a dipshit who thinks confrontational behavior like agressive driving makes your dick bigger.

C'mon, Russo boy. You seem to think you have some superior level of intelligence with your questions. Thrill us with your philopophy on why government should make it illegal for us to buy hemp drinks/products.