Started By
Message
re: It’s Thursday and Auburn is still whining about last Saturday
Posted on 9/25/25 at 5:13 pm to Ostrich
Posted on 9/25/25 at 5:13 pm to Ostrich
quote:
Can you explain or point me to it?
They think a WR slowly meandering outside the hash and lining up like normal is "substitution deception". Cuz everybody knows when teams sub players in and out, they all slowly meander on and off the field.
0
Posted on 9/25/25 at 5:15 pm to AHM21
Posted on 9/25/25 at 5:21 pm to higgs_boson
Auburn fans making their whining this week about 2013 nice deflection for your soft AD
nice deflection for your soft AD Posted on 9/25/25 at 5:32 pm to AHM21
Once again, having an excuse or being a victim is vital to the Auburn ethos. They eat that shite up.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 5:42 pm to gumpinmizzou
Cmon
Use the opportunity to nail down that 5th losing season in a row. At least you have hoopyshoot to look forward to….oh sorry.
Use the opportunity to nail down that 5th losing season in a row. At least you have hoopyshoot to look forward to….oh sorry.
This post was edited on 9/25/25 at 5:45 pm
Posted on 9/25/25 at 5:45 pm to Atxgump
Posted on 9/25/25 at 5:51 pm to AHM21
What an idiot..
Posted on 9/25/25 at 5:58 pm to higgs_boson
quote:
shite. They are still mad about 2013, when they lost the IB without any bad calls.
There was one terrible call.
To go for a 57 yard field goal with only slow linemen on the field.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 6:00 pm to AHM21
Humanity is disappointed in John Cohen. We deserve better.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 6:00 pm to Ostrich
quote:you can literally google "what rule did OK break against Auburn?" and get this reply
Can you explain or point me to it?
In their September 2025 game, Oklahoma broke NCAA Rule 9-2, Article 2, which prohibits "unfair tactics" and specifically forbids using simulated substitutions to confuse an opponent. The violation occurred during a second-quarter touchdown play.
How the play unfolded:
Oklahoma wide receiver Isaiah Sategna stayed on the field after the previous play.
He started jogging toward the sideline, as if he was substituting out of the game.
Just before crossing the sideline, Sategna suddenly stopped and ran to an open position downfield.
Because the Auburn defense was fooled into thinking he was leaving the field, Sategna was wide open to receive a 24-yard touchdown pass.
Oklahoma fans are dumb
Posted on 9/25/25 at 6:05 pm to AUTubaHerd
quote:
To go for a 57 yard field goal with only slow linemen on the field.
The funniest part..............saban pitched a hissy to get one second put back on the clock.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 6:07 pm to AHM21
That call did not directly cost Auburn the football game.
This one however did absolutely cost Arkansas a win. Auburn has not vacated it.
This one however did absolutely cost Arkansas a win. Auburn has not vacated it.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 9/25/25 at 6:11 pm to BigSneezy
For a detailed explanation of why it was not an illegal play and why everyone thinks it was go to this thread on the Oklahoma forum.
Auburn fans are a bunch of female genitalia.
Auburn fans are a bunch of female genitalia.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 6:12 pm to captdalton
How the hell do you intentionally ground a backwards pass?
Posted on 9/25/25 at 6:15 pm to MrAUTigers
It’s been 12 years and Auburn has lost five straight against Alabama. Move on
It’s been five days and Auburn lost. Move on.
It’s been five days and Auburn lost. Move on.
This post was edited on 9/25/25 at 6:17 pm
Posted on 9/25/25 at 6:29 pm to AHM21
It’s Thursday and Bama fans are still obsessing about Auburn.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 6:31 pm to AHM21
If they didn't average less than 2 yards rushing, or didn't give up 10 sacks, they might've won.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 6:33 pm to LegndarySnipes
What's dumb is everyone accepting what a network "rules analyst" said was an illegal play without having actually seen any evidence.
I have watched and rewatched the network broadcast of that play. During the broadcast a key part of the play was not shown as what everyone saw were shots on the sideline of OU OC Arbuckle and another of the Auburn band.
After getting the ball and then a holding penalty it was 1st and 20 from the 22-yard line. On 1st & 20 OU ran a play with RB Blaylock being tackled for a 2-yard loss.
Sategna had gone in motion from right to left in an attempt to draw the defense away from the RB which did not work but after the play, he stopped then continued to towards the sideline where he lined up for the 2nd down play.
That was when the network started showing Arbuckle, the band and then Arbuckle again. What we missed was the officials spotting the ball and OU running to the line to go uptempo.
It was only after the play had started that the network hurriedly cut back to the play on the field so no one saw how OU was lined up or the snap. What everyone saw was Mateer dropping back and throwing the ball to a receiver who was not in the shot until the camera followed the path of the ball to Sategna now inside the 5-yard line and subsequent score.
After the play Freeze was upset but not because of how the play was run but with the officials because he had been trying to call timeout when he saw OU go uptempo, he knew his defense was not set and that was why they lost track of where Sategna had lined up.
It wasn't unitl the PAT and a commercial break the "rules analyst" comes on and opines that it might have been an illegal play even as he admitted he did not see where Sategna was prior to the TD.
And that is what started all the wailing and gnashing of teeth over this.
I have watched and rewatched the network broadcast of that play. During the broadcast a key part of the play was not shown as what everyone saw were shots on the sideline of OU OC Arbuckle and another of the Auburn band.
After getting the ball and then a holding penalty it was 1st and 20 from the 22-yard line. On 1st & 20 OU ran a play with RB Blaylock being tackled for a 2-yard loss.
Sategna had gone in motion from right to left in an attempt to draw the defense away from the RB which did not work but after the play, he stopped then continued to towards the sideline where he lined up for the 2nd down play.
That was when the network started showing Arbuckle, the band and then Arbuckle again. What we missed was the officials spotting the ball and OU running to the line to go uptempo.
It was only after the play had started that the network hurriedly cut back to the play on the field so no one saw how OU was lined up or the snap. What everyone saw was Mateer dropping back and throwing the ball to a receiver who was not in the shot until the camera followed the path of the ball to Sategna now inside the 5-yard line and subsequent score.
After the play Freeze was upset but not because of how the play was run but with the officials because he had been trying to call timeout when he saw OU go uptempo, he knew his defense was not set and that was why they lost track of where Sategna had lined up.
It wasn't unitl the PAT and a commercial break the "rules analyst" comes on and opines that it might have been an illegal play even as he admitted he did not see where Sategna was prior to the TD.
And that is what started all the wailing and gnashing of teeth over this.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 6:34 pm to AHM21
It can be argued that you're whining about Auburn whining...
Posted on 9/25/25 at 6:37 pm to JacieNY
Yep. Previous poster was right. Oklahoma fans are dumb.
Page 2 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News