Started By
Message
Is This Targeting?
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:08 pm
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:08 pm
46 second mark.
Yes, the QB is a ball carrier so the rules are slightly different, as they should be.
Defender makes no attempt whatsoever to wrap or tackle. In fact, he crosses his arms around his own chest to protect himself from a direct head to head hit he is intentionally initiating to intentionally injure a player.
I think the NCAA needs to look at this and suspend him for the rest of the year. This is the kind of thing we want to get out of college football or the sport won't be around very long.
Yes, the QB is a ball carrier so the rules are slightly different, as they should be.
Defender makes no attempt whatsoever to wrap or tackle. In fact, he crosses his arms around his own chest to protect himself from a direct head to head hit he is intentionally initiating to intentionally injure a player.
I think the NCAA needs to look at this and suspend him for the rest of the year. This is the kind of thing we want to get out of college football or the sport won't be around very long.
This post was edited on 12/8/24 at 7:11 pm
41
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:09 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Targetting
Your shitty spelling has targeted us all.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:11 pm to deeprig9
They got the call right in the end. He was leading g with his shoulder and it didn’t look like he was going for the head.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:11 pm to Arkapigdiesel
quote:
Your shitty spelling has targeted us all.
Go frick yourself.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:11 pm to deeprig9
No, it wasn't targeting.
But I'm glad the QB lived.
But I'm glad the QB lived.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:12 pm to deeprig9
frick no that’s not targeting. Quit being a pussy.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:12 pm to deeprig9
No it wasn’t
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:12 pm to deeprig9
Targeting is a philosophical subjective discussion depending on what team committed the penalty and if the check cleared.
For example, when Haynes King was hit in the Georgia vs Tech game and fumbled. There was no call for targeting, and it caused an uproar here. Georgia said no targeting. Same situation here, difference of opinion.
For example, when Haynes King was hit in the Georgia vs Tech game and fumbled. There was no call for targeting, and it caused an uproar here. Georgia said no targeting. Same situation here, difference of opinion.
This post was edited on 12/8/24 at 7:15 pm
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:13 pm to Froman
quote:
They got the call right in the end. He was leading g with his shoulder and it didn’t look like he was going for the head.
Are you fricking blind or just trolling? Absolutely does not lead with his shoulder.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:13 pm to deeprig9
You have a ginormous vagina between your legs lady.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:14 pm to deeprig9
quote:
I think the NCAA needs to look at this and suspend him for the rest of the year. This is the kind of thing we want to get out of college football or the sport won't be around very long.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:14 pm to deeprig9
This was not targeting. It was a great hit. You sound like you might pull for Ohio State.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:14 pm to deeprig9
Nope clean hit
Knocked him the frick out
Knocked him the frick out
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:15 pm to Arkapigdiesel
You’re just mad cause your dude got popped. If you run the QB up the middle, eventually he’s going to get hit hard. If you can’t handle it, don’t watch.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:16 pm to deeprig9
It was OT of a title game and the runner was close to a first down, should he not have tried to blow him up? if Stockton fumbles and we recover the game is over.
Your QBs head was out front and he hits him with the shoulder. The rules expert didn't think it was targeting, the refs didn't think it was targeting, so why are y'all still melting over this?
Fortunately for y'all, Stockton isn't a gaping pussy like several of your posters.
Your QBs head was out front and he hits him with the shoulder. The rules expert didn't think it was targeting, the refs didn't think it was targeting, so why are y'all still melting over this?
Fortunately for y'all, Stockton isn't a gaping pussy like several of your posters.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:16 pm to deeprig9
It’s being discussed bc he’s a smaller qb but he’s also a runner. If that was a 210 lb RB it wouldn’t have even been up for debate. Not targeting.
Although I’ve seen it called for less.
Although I’ve seen it called for less.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:17 pm to deeprig9
No, not targeting.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:17 pm to deeprig9
No, sally.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:18 pm to deeprig9
No. It should be a flag for Triggering instead. Too bad they don't have a flag for that yet.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 7:18 pm to deeprig9
Not targeting. Yall won the game, quit trying to cope for no reason.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News