Started By
Message
re: Is it reasonable to expect Tennessee football to turn around?
Posted on 5/30/17 at 9:13 pm to scrooster
Posted on 5/30/17 at 9:13 pm to scrooster
quote:
Tennessee has a good program, good tradition, facilities, etc.
The Vols will remain competitive for the above reasons. They have all of the "infrastructure" of an elite program in place and really haven't ever lost it. What they lack is coaching. They need to get an SEC man back in to head that program, imo. Butch isn't the guy. As long as the Vols recruit well as they have been, they'll be in the upper tier in this conference but I don't see them winning the SEC until they get a real SEC coach.
Posted on 5/30/17 at 9:27 pm to Johnny B Goode
quote:
The Vols will remain competitive for the above reasons. They have all of the "infrastructure" of an elite program in place and really haven't ever lost it. What they lack is coaching. They need to get an SEC man back in to head that program, imo. Butch isn't the guy. As long as the Vols recruit well as they have been, they'll be in the upper tier in this conference but I don't see them winning the SEC until they get a real SEC coach.
I don't think anyone would disagree that elite programs need great coaches. The problem is there just aren't that many talented coaches right now that are actually able to live up to that and the ones with any sense will go somewhere outside the SEC and take an easy path to the CFP. Look around the league right now and tell me if you can spot a clear no. 2 now that Miles is gone. The coaching situation is awful and only Alabama has a good coach - Mullen is arguable but only because we all wonder how much being at State has effected him as a coach (is he held back because it's difficult to breakthrough at State or could he step into a Big 6 school and take them to 10+ wins every year?).
As for coaches outside the conference, a lot of hot names get mentioned as being better but I'm not certain they are since a lot of their success is happening in conferences where they only play two decent opponents a year. I think there are a lot fewer talented coaches available than many want to believe and that's one of the reasons why you rarely see programs outside the usual suspects compete for anything and why it's so incredibly rare for anyone new to the ranks of elite programs to break in and actually win anything. College football isn't in a golden era when it comes to coaching talent.
Posted on 5/30/17 at 10:00 pm to TRUERockyTop
quote:
What do you tell your kids about South Carolina being 8-25 all time against UT and losing 3 out of the last 4? Did the greatest coach in your history even win 1 game against Butch The Lesbian Jones?
I tell him we are 50-50 against y'all in his memorable history ... and that's all he remembers.
I tell him Phat Phil was as bad a hypothetical lying POS as Obama, and that really registers with him.
I tell him how th past is for pussies and losers and he gets that.
I tell him how, over the next fifty years, during his peak pussy getting years, the Gamecocks will be even with or have a winning record against the Vols ... and he agrees.
ETA: Most Vols fans, deep down, agree.
This post was edited on 5/30/17 at 10:01 pm
Posted on 5/30/17 at 10:01 pm to scrooster
You have serious issues old man.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 1:22 am to TRUERockyTop
quote:
Not sure. We've always been better than Georgia though.
We have to go back to 1953 for UT to have a better winning % than UGA from today. Thats 64 years
Congrats on your grandfathers and great grandfathersteams of the 50's and before
Posted on 5/31/17 at 6:19 am to BHMKyle
Never - we're doomed for all eternity - but we're still better than Georgia
Posted on 5/31/17 at 7:34 am to BHMKyle
Resources and support are more of the determining factor along side a competent AD. Tennessee has the first two, but has been worlds away from even a decent AD for decades.
Getting the right coach also plays a huge role, now more so than ever.
I am in the wait and see position with Currie, but it is very discouraging that we passed on a homerun in our backyard because he wasn't some yes man little bitch.
Getting the right coach also plays a huge role, now more so than ever.
I am in the wait and see position with Currie, but it is very discouraging that we passed on a homerun in our backyard because he wasn't some yes man little bitch.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 7:45 am to TRUERockyTop
quote:
TRUERockyTop
Off-topic a bit, but those screen shots: is that an app or site?
Posted on 5/31/17 at 7:47 am to scrooster
This is what we've been missing on the Gamecock board.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 7:48 am to TRUERockyTop
quote:
Not sure. We've always been better than Georgia though.
Exibit A
Posted on 5/31/17 at 8:07 am to BHMKyle
A better question would be...
Is it reasonable to expect Georgia football to turn around?
I say no. It will be the same bullshite we've heard for 36 years.
Georgia is super talented. Georgia has a top notch quarterback. UGA has the best backfield in the nation. My God, what an offensive line UGA has. You just can't beat Georgia's defense. This is Georgia's year.
Then they will come out and win 8 or 9 games and go to a mid-level bowl game. Rinse and repeat.
Is it reasonable to expect Georgia football to turn around?
I say no. It will be the same bullshite we've heard for 36 years.
Georgia is super talented. Georgia has a top notch quarterback. UGA has the best backfield in the nation. My God, what an offensive line UGA has. You just can't beat Georgia's defense. This is Georgia's year.
Then they will come out and win 8 or 9 games and go to a mid-level bowl game. Rinse and repeat.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 8:14 am to AnActualFan
quote:
It is reasonable to expect them to turn it around, because in a sense they already have.
So finishing #22 in the AP for two years in a row means Tennessee football is back? Maybe its out of the gutter, but its nowhere close to where the program was from the 1930s through about 2004.
quote:
I say this with no malice, but I think they have peaked under Jones.
Ok. So if Jones is not able to get Tennessee back to being a Top 20 team, and he's already peaked, then its reasonable to to assume Tennessee is just not a Top 20 type program anymore, let alone a Top 10 program like they used to be.
This is my entire point.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 8:16 am to BHMKyle
VOLS will win the East if they can get past Vandy.
Posted on 5/31/17 at 8:21 am to BHMKyle
Since 1992 (expansion) (start of modern era of SEC Football)
- Tennessee leads series 14-11
- Tennessee leads in National Titles 1-0
- Tied in SEC Championships 2-2
- Tied in SEC Championship Game Appearances 5-5
- Tied in Top 5 finishes 3-3
- Georgia leads in Top 10 finishes 7-6
- Georgia leads in Top 25 finishes 16-15
- Georgia leads in major (Alliance/BCS) bowl appearances 3-2
- Georgia leads in bowl appearances 22-20
- Both teams had down years (UGA the 90s, UT the 2000s) and a stable period (Richt and Fulmer) and both are now trying to navigate their ways back
So, basically, the two programs are relatively even since 1992 (25 years), with Tennessee holding the head to head and national title trump card.
- Tennessee leads series 14-11
- Tennessee leads in National Titles 1-0
- Tied in SEC Championships 2-2
- Tied in SEC Championship Game Appearances 5-5
- Tied in Top 5 finishes 3-3
- Georgia leads in Top 10 finishes 7-6
- Georgia leads in Top 25 finishes 16-15
- Georgia leads in major (Alliance/BCS) bowl appearances 3-2
- Georgia leads in bowl appearances 22-20
- Both teams had down years (UGA the 90s, UT the 2000s) and a stable period (Richt and Fulmer) and both are now trying to navigate their ways back
So, basically, the two programs are relatively even since 1992 (25 years), with Tennessee holding the head to head and national title trump card.
This post was edited on 5/31/17 at 8:31 am
Posted on 5/31/17 at 8:36 am to SummerOfGeorge
My man dropping bombs
This post was edited on 5/31/17 at 8:37 am
Posted on 5/31/17 at 8:42 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Since 1992 (expansion) (start of modern era of SEC Football)
- Tennessee leads series 14-11
- Tennessee leads in National Titles 1-0
- Tied in SEC Championships 2-2
- Tied in SEC Championship Game Appearances 5-5
- Tied in Top 5 finishes 3-3
- Georgia leads in Top 10 finishes 7-6
- Georgia leads in Top 25 finishes 16-15
- Georgia leads in major (Alliance/BCS) bowl appearances 3-2
- Georgia leads in bowl appearances 22-20
- Both teams had down years (UGA the 90s, UT the 2000s) and a stable period (Richt and Fulmer) and both are now trying to navigate their ways back
So, basically, the two programs are relatively even since 1992 (25 years), with Tennessee holding the head to head and national title trump card.
Now do the last 10 years. The mid 90s and early 2000 period just happened to be UT's best since the 1940s or 50s, back before the SEC integrated. As previously noted by the South Carolina fan, Fulmer's unprecedented "secret ncaa witness" to bring down his hated rival at UA, all while cheating his arse off, was instrumental in his short lived success. Do UT since 1970, which is when all SEC teams were integrated. Also as previously noted, you will find that UT is 5th in winning pct and 6th in number of SEC titles.
This post was edited on 5/31/17 at 8:46 am
Posted on 5/31/17 at 8:42 am to TigerProwl24
quote:so im pretty sure 13-7 is relevance on the football field
since UGA can't provide any actual relevance on the football field.
This post was edited on 5/31/17 at 8:45 am
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News