Favorite team:Texas 
Location:Nashville, TN
Biography:
Interests:LSU Football
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1889
Registered on:12/7/2014
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

How does that make you feel?


It makes me feel like you need something better to do with your day sir.
quote:

Would you like me to frame Miami, ole Miss, and Oregon as well?


No thanks. Anyone with a working understand of the sport knows Indiana had an unusually old roster this year. It’s fine, no (normal) person thinks that takes anything away from anyone, it’s just an observation. In any case, all this screeching about it online is largely fueled by people who are going to journey back to soccer and F1 when there’s no inspirational underdog in the sport next year.
The amount of statistical framing and reframing I’m seeing on this topic reminds me of people zooming in and out of world temperature graphs when arguing about global warming lmao.
quote:

That’s a lie and outright one at that.


What I like is that, even if it isn’t, as soon as one thinks about it for a few seconds, that number still implies a really really old roster lmao.
quote:

The average age of Indiana's starters (not roster, starters) was 22.4. That means they are mostly normal college seniors/RS seniors.


Hang on. I mean that average value also suggests that there’s a handful of players who are like 24 years old lmao. Unless the starters are all hovering around 22-23 years in age, which is also striking me as a very old roster. This also needs to be considered in light of today’s roster turnover at 99% of programs. This isn’t 2005.

Idk I feel like it’s a valid point that they had a very, very senior roster. And theres a lot of nuance to defining an “old” roster, like how long they’ve been playing together, relevancy of the ages for bench players who rotate in frequently as opposed to the irrelevancy of the ones who don’t, etc.

It’s a very Reddit, “I just started watching football 3 months ago because Go Hoosiers and screw Bama lol,” thing to just pull a random stat and say “see the roster wasn’t that old.” Most unbiased voices in the sport all agree it’s a very old roster, but who cares. Again, it’s dumb Reddit-tier fans who need to have their cake, and eat it too, and show it to all their friends and family without anyone saying a word against it.

re: Best Team in CFP era

Posted by buckRogers on 1/21/26 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Indiana arguably has to be the best team in the CFP era.


Perhaps top 10, although one would want to properly credit JMU and CAL for properly aging the players to a ripe 25 and promptly turning them over to fill out the entire roster. Lest we forget, it takes a village.
To the extent one imports a slew of 25-year olds and a viable one-year quarterback from California, I would think that one. Same probably goes for any conference though.
Fair point, Joby doesn’t seem as much of a scam.
The issue with this field is the players themselves. Look up Archer, Uber Elevate, etc. It’s a bunch of tech bros who are great at raising money, terrible at bringing an actual product to market. This has been around for years and none of these companies have an actual working prototype that is anywhere close to passing FAA regulations. I guess it’s a pretty huge leap in technology so maybe one shouldn’t be so cynical, but it’s tough not to be when all the people behind it are just venture-capital grifters.

re: Legal THC going away

Posted by buckRogers on 11/11/25 at 4:18 am to
quote:

mom and pop hemp shops.


I don’t agree with the bill, but the commercial space is entirely occupied by overseas distributors with a dash of trust fund tools who get to larp as “entrepreneurs” because it’s impossible to screw the business model up if you have half a million to blow on marketing. The only real victims here are the end-consumers


Edit - I’m obviously neglecting the retailer side, which does include “mom and pop shops” as it were. Even still, having a hard time conjuring a sympathetic image there.
quote:

I like Pavia more than Lea


Vanderbilt’s recruiting is trending upwards, but they’re still about the same talent level as Kentucky or Mississippi state overall. The reason Vanderbilt has won the games they have, and were competitive against bama and Texas, is because they invariably show up as the team that is much more disciplined and much better coached top to bottom. Put another way, they haven’t played a game this year where they didnt have a significant advantage in terms of coaching.

Pavia certainly adds some juice but if you swap him out with Sellers at South Carolina I don’t think south Carolina’s record is much different. Point is, Lea is the “secret ingredient” for Vanderbilt, not Pavia.
quote:

You keep saying this with no real objective data to back it up other than “trust me bro”


^ This needs to go on a billboard in Palo Alto. Welcome to the “tech” industry and the world of smooth-brained day-traders lol
AI will certainly change how things are done in the long-run, but people are confusing that with the short-run economy (let’s say the next 15 years). Strictly going by objective info, 1) most polled businesses have opined that it isn’t significantly helpful, 2) overall consumer usage has reached what is at least a local peak and is declining (again, this could be a local peak but it’s worth noting along other points), and 3) there is simply no way to evaluate the circular economy involving OpenAI, Nvidia, etc. without one conclusion being that there is a staggering deficit in commercial sales & application (not getting into the whole “bubble” thing). And don’t get me started on the fact that the data centers required for any actual commercial impact are exponentially worse for the environment than the entirety of the fossil fuel industry.

What we’re dealing with presently is a very macabre theatre production. The only people spouting off shite like this are pencil-necks desperately trying to sell their (or their stock in) some BS “ai-powered parking app” or what-have-you.

So chill out with these daily threads. Half of the personal anecdotes posted are obviously fabricated btw.
quote:

may have been caused by a cigarette.


Terrible for the environment smh
Wasn’t aware that the board’s ban on Hobert slander had been lifted. Crazy times.
quote:

This summer has actually been slightly cooler than normal.

That's because I'm around


Underrated post
Don’t forget that Georgia fan who was mad about the coastal Carolina coaches getting ejected and over the course of a 20+ page thread would respond to and argue with literally anyone who commented

It was like John wick except it was the rant and he lost every fight
Someone REALLY likes Myrtle beach huh

re: Ryan Clark Gets WRECKED

Posted by buckRogers on 5/21/25 at 7:03 am to
quote:

.............and you think RG3's "schtick" was "done in earnest"?


It’s a thread about Ryan Clark, not RG3. RG3 is a bit of a clown, but more akin to Russel Wilson where it’s all just a bit cheesy. He’s no favorite of mine and I find his recurrent “best there never was” stuff about his injuries pretty silly, but RG3 actually does serviceable in-game commentating and seems to have a multi-faceted post-NFL career.

Unlike Ryan Clark, he hasn’t had to debase himself into an AI chatbot engineered for the sole purpose of catering to the hordes of politically polarized and mentally ill.