Favorite team:Texas 
Location:Nashville, TN
Biography:
Interests:LSU Football
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1908
Registered on:12/7/2014
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Cignetti’s 2025 is the exception and not the norm.


quote:

Ole Miss (which will return to mediocrity after this year when Trinidad is gone.)


Just looking at Indiana and Ole Miss the common denominator would in fact appear to be having key players who are in their late 20s.
quote:

That’s a Hughes ask


Despicable pun.

re: NFC South

Posted by buckRogers on 11/9/26 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Saints were down to some guy they just signed that week at RB if I recall.


quote:

some guy


Insane Julius Jones slander.
quote:

A jury tried to punish four neighbors with millions of dollars in punitive damages for speaking out.


Hang on, what? So did a jury actually find some of the homeowners liable for defamation? Sounds like there’s more to this. That aside, just google Aaron Guess. Guy is definitely trying to get these people out of the homes in order to resell and pay off this and other dumb slum-lord schemes.

ETA: as someone else mentioned, they might have had poor representation or none at all for those legal proceedings. Still, without glancing at North Carolina’s defamation standards, there’s a big disconnect between the facts presented and a jury handing down a punitive verdict against the homeowners. not sure bad/self-representation can even account for that.
It’s a very interesting wormhole to go down into. I (personally) think that if you take all the evidence in hand, and consider the idiosyncrasies / unexplained issues for what they are (without frothing at the mouth, just consider them, dismiss some as non-issues, acknowledge some as real or potential issues, etc.), then it makes it unlikely (e.g. 45% probability) that the moon landing footage shown to the public was an accurate depiction of the US traveling to the moon surface. That doesn’t mean that we didn’t land on the moon in a fashion analogous to the footage, im speaking exclusively to the validity of the footage. I think it is more likely than not that the moon landing footage was “faked,” as it were. The implications of that are very interesting, but are altogether a separate and unrelated topic in my view.
quote:

except qb

Why is Willem Dafoe’s face grafted into this. This is Gary Oldman.

AI is ruining this country smh.
quote:

hardly post here. Came to share what I’ve heard. Sorry you’re upset.


To the extent someone told you that, they were clearly patronizing you and told you the most ridiculous thing they could think of. Perhaps they were wondering whether this shmoe just takes this right to the Rant. Then they check and see one “Busch” posting this apparent insider info. Classic info-ruse.
I for one love the MS Paint work and implore you not to pander to the AI slop.
quote:

AI already solved a very old math equation last week that was considered impossible.


I think someone else in the thread may have caught this, but I believe they just copied someone’s academic work on the subject. And to be clear neither the academic work nor OpenAI’s appropriation of their work has been shown to involve use of AI in the first place.

Speaks to a larger problem with all the doomer theories on AI. People just throw out these fantastic achievements left and right but the reality is if it isn’t something mundane that is saving people some narrow amount of time (i.e. doc organization & summaries, text pre-fill, atrocious novels and movies), you’ll find that there’s an astounding chance that it is completely made up. And to be clear I would unequivocally place Anthropic’s cure to cancer in the “completely made up” category - not in the “they’re working on it but they’re not actually that close” sense, but more so in the “they’re not actually even working on that” sense.

Edit - this is besides the point but the academic solution wasn’t even of the nature presented by OpenAI. It was a solution to the navier-stokes problem. It’s beyond my IQ, but as I understand, it’s a complicated fluid dynamics proposition that doesn’t have a “solution” in the 1+1=2 fashion that we typically think of. It’s more of a challenge to make any way to predict anything about this complex system. The “solution” found by the academics, while a huge achievement, was a very narrow proofing that had to assume very narrow conditions under this fluid system in order to permit a “solution” that was able to make a workable input -> output theory on system behavior.

I digress. My understanding of this sort of thing is limited to the explanations of “non linear systems” and “chaos theory” used in the Jurassic Park novels.
quote:

where are all these NCAA "appellate" court victories.


quote:

Yes


Lmao cmon
Not sure what the jails are like but I believe Singapore has a very expansive view on which crimes warrant life in prison / death penalty.
quote:

ou should take a look at what Indiana is returning/upgraded via portal. If the QB from TCU works out, they could easily repeat


Average age of Indiana’s starters / rotational contributors is going to be like 3 years less this year. That difference, taken for what it is, could just as easily attributed to the age gaps between certain nfl teams and college teams.

They’ve got a coward’s schedule so not saying they’re gonna fall off and go 6-6, but to say that they’ll have a better team (or even a team of substantially similar quality) is frankly stupid.
quote:

makes energy cheap


Come again?

Also everything in OP’s post is just Altman-ese for “we are once again nearly out of money.”
I’m sure this applies everywhere, but you see a lot of folks moving to Denver / Salt Lake City who think this way. Massive trucks (clean wheels) driving 30 over and running red lights. Ultimately they’re all man-babies who watched too much Yellowstone and ignore several stages of reality in order to have a lifestyle that doesn’t actually fit their true scenario. Reality: don’t buy a “dream mountain getaway” when you still need to drive an hour+ to a job in order to afford it. The fact that you still need that job means you couldn’t “afford it” by all conventional measures. If you insist on doing that, don’t saddle everyone else with the realities of your decision by driving like a maniac every day. Just leave earlier, and be okay getting home later. If you can’t leave earlier or get home on time because of family / child obligations, again, you could not in fact afford the lifestyle.


Oh and doing all the above in a 2025 F-150 doesn’t make it look more legitimate, it just makes it easier for everyone else to tell that you’re going through a mid-life crisis.

re: "Would Indiana beat 2019 LSU?"

Posted by buckRogers on 7/10/26 at 4:50 am to
Seems reasonable. Average age of indianas starters would have been like 4 years older than LSU’s.
quote:

No way Coach K was clean.


Anyone who thinks that coach k didn’t pay players (or even that he wasn’t aware of it) owns the The Blind Side on dvd, saying that it is a great and historically accurate film
quote:

Tom Izzo has built a lot more equity in college basketball than Will Wade.


This summarizes the hate for wade since day 1. It was fine for Coach K, Rick Pitino, et.al. to pay players, but it wasn’t okay for Wade to do so. Why, because “equity”? Get outta here. it was dumb when that wine-drunk bastard dick vitale went on his campaign, and it’s MUCH dumber now in the NIL era.
Unique advantage - his teammates on the raiders will be about the same age as his IU teammates, maybe younger in some spots. So culture adjustment may not be too hard.
quote:

How does that make you feel?


It makes me feel like you need something better to do with your day sir.
quote:

Would you like me to frame Miami, ole Miss, and Oregon as well?


No thanks. Anyone with a working understand of the sport knows Indiana had an unusually old roster this year. It’s fine, no (normal) person thinks that takes anything away from anyone, it’s just an observation. In any case, all this screeching about it online is largely fueled by people who are going to journey back to soccer and F1 when there’s no inspirational underdog in the sport next year.
The amount of statistical framing and reframing I’m seeing on this topic reminds me of people zooming in and out of world temperature graphs when arguing about global warming lmao.